MOSQUITO SHIELD vs SweetWater Technologies (powered by Gripp)
Franchise Comparison 2026
Both MOSQUITO SHIELD and SweetWater Technologies (powered by Gripp) are home services franchises. MOSQUITO SHIELD requires an investment of $121K – $158K while SweetWater Technologies (powered by Gripp) requires $89K – $191K. In terms of revenue, MOSQUITO SHIELD reports higher average unit revenue at $286K. MOSQUITO SHIELD has SBA lending data on file with a 7.7% charge-off rate. FranchiseVerdict rates MOSQUITO SHIELD A (Top Quintile) and SweetWater Technologies (powered by Gripp) D (Below Average).
| Metric | MOSQUITO SHIELD | SweetWater Technologies (powered by Gripp) |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict Grade | ATop QuintileTop Quintile | DBelow AverageBelow Average |
| Investment Range | $121K – $158K | $89K – $191K |
| Franchise Fee | $55K | $10K |
| Royalty Rate | 8.0% | 0.3% |
| Average Revenue (Item 19) | $286K | $147K |
| SBA Charge-Off Rate | 7.7% (63 loans) | N/A |
| Total Units | 435 | 5 |
| Unit Growth (YoY) | N/A | N/A |
| Year Began Franchising | 2013 | 2024 |
| FDD Year | 2025 | 2025 |
MOSQUITO SHIELD
ATop QuintileTop Quintile
SweetWater Technologies (powered by Gripp)
DBelow AverageBelow Average
Investment Range
$121K – $158K
$89K – $191K
Franchise Fee
$55K
$10K
Royalty Rate
8.0%
0.3%
Average Revenue (Item 19)
$286K
$147K
SBA Charge-Off Rate
7.7% (63 loans)
N/A
Total Units
435
5
Unit Growth (YoY)
N/A
N/A
Year Began Franchising
2013
2024
FDD Year
2025
2025