FranchiseVerdict
Salted Barber logo
B63/100FDD 2026

Salted Barber — Litigation & Risk

Personal Services - Beauty & Salon · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5

Back to overview

Lower Risk

No litigation cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.

Source: FDD Items 3–5

FDD Items 3 & 4

Litigation Metrics

Cases disclosed
0
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Overall risk score
63 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite
Rating
MODERATE
STRONG / MODERATE / CAUTION / AVOID

FDD Items 5, 6 & 17 — what you give up

Contract Risk Indicators

Mandatory arbitration
Not required
You retain the right to sue in court
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
California
State whose law governs disputes — relevant if you're not based there

What drove the 63/100 rating

Risk Score Breakdown

  1. 01MINOROnly 2 units operating with unknown/stagnant growth trajectory raises viability concerns
  2. 02MEDNo Item 19 financial data disclosed despite $666.5K average revenue claim — unverifiable performance
  3. 03MINORUnprotected territory creates direct competition risk; no exclusivity guarantee for $254K+ investment
  4. 04HIGHGoing Concern designation indicates potential financial distress at franchisor level
  5. 05MINOR6% royalty on $666.5K average revenue = $40K annual fees with minimal franchisor support infrastructure for only 2 units

Severity inferred from FDD text — not a regulatory or legal classification

Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice — consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.