B56/100FDD 2026
Radiant Results — Litigation & Risk
Health & Wellness - Other · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5
Lower Risk
No litigation cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.
Source: FDD Items 3–5
FDD Items 3 & 4
Litigation Metrics
Cases disclosed
0
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
—
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Overall risk score
56 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite
Rating
MODERATE
STRONG / MODERATE / CAUTION / AVOID
FDD Items 5, 6 & 17 — what you give up
Contract Risk Indicators
Mandatory arbitration
Required
Disputes resolved outside court — limits your legal options
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
Colorado
State whose law governs disputes — relevant if you're not based there
What drove the 56/100 rating
Risk Score Breakdown
- 01MINOROnly 2 units in system with unknown growth trajectory indicates early-stage or stalled expansion
- 02MINORWide investment range ($61,649–$444,500) suggests inconsistent unit economics or unclear cost structure
- 03MINORNo Item 19 financial disclosure despite strong claimed averages ($745K revenue, $397K net) limits verification
- 04MINOR8% royalty on gross sales (not net) creates cash flow pressure during revenue fluctuations
- 05MINORFranchise fee ($65,000) approaches lower end of investment range, raising questions about franchisor sustainability
Severity inferred from FDD text — not a regulatory or legal classification
Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice — consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.