FDD Items 3 & 4 · 2025 filing
Graze Craze litigation history
What Graze Craze disclosed about lawsuits, arbitrations and bankruptcy in the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document. Item 3 lists the material legal actions a franchisor must report; Item 4 covers bankruptcy. This is the franchisor's own disclosure, not a court record, and not legal advice.
Items 3 & 4 at a glance
What the filing discloses
- Cases disclosed
- 6
- Item 3, as counted in the filing
- Largest disclosed settlement
- None stated
- Bankruptcy (Item 4)
- None
- Franchisor, parent, predecessor or officer
- Filing year
- 2025
- Disclosures cover the prior ten years
Extracted from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document
Item 3: litigation
Two pending cases involving GCZ's VP of Operations Max Gonzalez related to prior employer Mac and Cheese Franchise Operations (Indiana admin proceeding and Florida civil lawsuit). Four restrictive orders: FTC/Signarama (1993/1998), Maryland/Signarama (1996), California/TGG (2021), California/TGG+GCZ+UFG (2022 trade show violations).
Disclosure signals that moved the score
How this shows up in the verdict
- Significant litigation history involving management across multiple brands (MACFO, Signaroma, Great Greek) with allegations of franchise law violations and disclosure failures—suggests systemic compliance issues
- Going Concern status is FALSE—indicates potential financial instability or undisclosed operational challenges at corporate level
- Management has prior litigation involvement across unrelated franchise concepts—pattern suggests potential recurring compliance or operational management issues
The verdict grade is FranchiseVerdict's editorial assessment across SBA loan performance, unit growth, revenue and disclosure signals. It is not investment advice.
Before you weigh a lawsuit
How to read Item 3
A franchisor must disclose pending actions and any material civil action involving the franchise relationship, plus convictions or civil judgments for fraud, unfair or deceptive practices, or franchise-law violations, going back ten years. A case the franchisor brought against a franchisee counts too. Item 3 does not include every dispute: settled claims below the materiality line and matters resolved in private arbitration can be absent.
Questions worth asking current and former franchisees, using the contact list in Item 20:
- Were you, or anyone you know in the system, party to a dispute with the franchisor?
- Was it resolved by settlement, arbitration or a court, and on what terms?
- Has the number of disputes gone up or down since you signed?