FranchiseVerdict
DaVi Nails / Em Lash Studio logo
B62/100FDD 2024

DaVi Nails / Em Lash Studio — Litigation & Risk

Personal Services - Beauty & Salon · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5

Back to overview

Moderate — Review

5 cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.

Source: FDD Items 3–5

FDD Items 3 & 4

Litigation Metrics

Cases disclosed
5
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Overall risk score
62 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite
Rating
MODERATE
STRONG / MODERATE / CAUTION / AVOID

7(a) FOIA data · FY2020–present

SBA Loan Performance

Aggregated from public SBA 7(a) loan disclosures. Default rate is the share of loans that were charged off or settled for less than the full balance.

Total 7(a) loans
36
Government-backed loans issued
Default rate
0.0%
vs <3% typical · system-wide
5-yr default rate
Defaults
0 loans
Loans charged off or defaulted

FDD Items 5, 6 & 17 — what you give up

Contract Risk Indicators

Mandatory arbitration
Not required
You retain the right to sue in court
Jury trial waiver
Not waived
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
Utah
State whose law governs disputes — relevant if you're not based there

What drove the 62/100 rating

Risk Score Breakdown

  1. 01HIGHGoing concern status is FALSE — indicates financial distress or uncertainty at franchisor level
  2. 02HIGHLitigation history: SEC/state regulatory actions in Virginia and California for illegal franchise sales and failure to provide required disclosures — suggests compliance failures and investor protection violations
  3. 03MINORStagnant unit growth: 400 units with only 0.3% YoY growth indicates a mature or declining system with minimal expansion
  4. 04MINORNo financial performance disclosure (Item 19): Average revenue and net income not provided — impossible to validate return on $61k-$143k investment
  5. 05MINORHigh franchise fee ($105,000) relative to low monthly royalties ($300-$1,000) creates unfavorable initial cost structure with unclear profitability path
  6. 06MINORNo territory protection: Franchisees face internal competition and risk of cannibalization within the same market
  7. 07MINORRoyalty range uncertainty: $700/month spread suggests inconsistent profitability or tiered systems that may disadvantage smaller operators

Severity inferred from FDD text — not a regulatory or legal classification

Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice — consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.