FranchiseVerdict
Crave Cookies logo
F96/100FDD 2025

Crave Cookies — Litigation & Risk

Food & Beverage - Bakery · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5

Back to overview

Moderate — Review

3 cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.

Source: FDD Items 3–5

FDD Items 3 & 4

Litigation Metrics

Cases disclosed
3
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Overall risk score
96 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite
Rating
AVOID
STRONG / MODERATE / CAUTION / AVOID

7(a) FOIA data · FY2020–present

SBA Loan Performance

Aggregated from public SBA 7(a) loan disclosures. Default rate is the share of loans that were charged off or settled for less than the full balance.

Total 7(a) loans
12
Government-backed loans issued
Default rate
50.0%
vs <3% typical · system-wide
5-yr default rate
50.0%
Defaults
1 loans
Loans charged off or defaulted
Total loan volume
$4.2M
Avg loan size
$348K
Participating lenders
11

FDD Items 5, 6 & 17 — what you give up

Contract Risk Indicators

Mandatory arbitration
Not required
You retain the right to sue in court
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
Utah
State whose law governs disputes — relevant if you're not based there

What drove the 96/100 rating

Risk Score Breakdown

  1. 01MEDNo Item 19 financial disclosures (Avg Revenue and Net Income not disclosed) prevents ROI validation and comparability across units
  2. 02MINORPending arbitration with D&G Ownership Group suggests current franchisee disputes; outcome and nature of claims unknown
  3. 03MED67% YoY unit growth appears strong but absolute unit count of 37 indicates early-stage system with limited operational track record and higher failure risk
  4. 04MEDHigh initial investment range ($327k–$704k) with undisclosed profitability creates misalignment between capital required and potential returns
  5. 05HIGHTwo litigation cases (one pending, one won by franchisor) indicate franchisee-franchisor relationship friction despite small unit base
  6. 06MINOR6% royalty on unreported gross sales lacks benchmarking; unclear if sustainable given unknown unit economics

Severity inferred from FDD text — not a regulatory or legal classification

Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice — consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.