Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Coldwell Banker logo
BAbove average56/100FDD 2026

Coldwell Banker: Litigation & Risk

Real Estate · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5

Back to overview

Elevated Risk

7 cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.

Source: FDD Items 3–5

FDD Items 3 & 4

Litigation Metrics

Cases disclosed
7
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Verdict score
56 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite · higher is better
Rating
B
A / B / C / D / F verdict grade

7(a) FOIA data · FY2020–present

SBA Loan Performance

Aggregated from public SBA 7(a) loan disclosures. Charge-off rate is the share of loans that were charged off or settled for less than the full balance.

Total 7(a) loans
78
Government-backed loans issued
Charge-off rate
16.3%
vs 16% franchise average
5-yr charge-off rate
0.0%
Defaults
8 loans
Loans charged off or defaulted
Total loan volume
$34.9M
Avg loan size
$448K
Participating lenders
32

FDD Items 5, 6 & 17: What You Give Up

Contract Risk Indicators

Mandatory arbitration
Not required
You retain the right to sue in court
Jury trial waiver
Not waived
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
NJ
State whose law governs disputes. Relevant if you're not based there

Extracted from FDD Item 3

Litigation Detail

Multiple pending and resolved matters including: trademark/breach suit vs former franchisee (won); TCPA class action settled $200K; antitrust commission suits (Moehrl/Burnett settled $83.5M); Nosalek MLS antitrust; Batton buyer-side antitrust/Tuccori opt-in settlement $9.6M; Chinitz TCPA Anywhere Advisors (preliminary settlement); Homie antitrust (dismissed); merger-related stockholder suits (mostly resolved).

What drove the 56/100 verdict

Risk Score Breakdown

  1. 01MINORDeclining unit count (-0.9% YoY) suggests market saturation or franchisee dissatisfaction in a mature 1,900-unit system
  2. 02MEDNo average revenue or net income disclosure (missing Item 19) prevents assessment of actual franchisee profitability and ROI
  3. 03HIGHMultiple active litigation categories including antitrust commission structure claims and TCPA class actions indicate systemic operational/legal risks
  4. 04MINORUnprotected territory creates direct competition risk between franchisees and potential margin compression
  5. 05MEDHigh investment ceiling ($521,775) combined with undisclosed returns creates asymmetric risk/reward profile
  6. 06MINORDeclining royalty structure incentivizes growth but may signal prior franchisee profitability concerns at standard 5.5% rate

Severity inferred from FDD text. Not a regulatory or legal classification

Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice. Consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.