How Much Does a No-H2o Franchise Cost?
Data from the 2022 Franchise Disclosure Document
Investment Summary
Total Investment
$135K – $163K
Franchise Fee
$50K
Royalty
8.0%
Ad Fund
2.0%
Cost Breakdown
Initial Franchise Fee
The initial franchise fee for No-H2o is $50K. This one-time payment covers the right to operate under the brand, access to proprietary systems, and initial training programs.
Total Investment Range
Opening a No-H2o franchise requires a total investment of $135K – $163K. This range typically includes real estate or leasehold improvements, equipment and fixtures, initial inventory, signage, insurance, and working capital to sustain operations during the ramp-up period.
Working capital alone ranges from $15K to $25K.
Ongoing Costs
Beyond the initial investment, No-H2o franchisees pay ongoing fees. The royalty fee is 8.0% of gross sales (Gross Sales). The advertising or brand fund contribution is 2.0% of gross sales. There is also a technology fee of $125.
Net Worth & Liquid Capital Requirements
No-H2o requires working capital of $15K – $25K to cover initial operating expenses. This is the liquid cash you should have available beyond the franchise fee and buildout costs.
What Can You Earn?
No-H2o does not disclose earnings data in Item 19 of its Franchise Disclosure Document. Not all franchisors choose to publish financial performance representations, though this is a data point many prospective franchisees consider important.
How Do Banks View No-H2o?
SBA Loans Issued
4
Default Rate
N/A
The SBA (Small Business Administration) tracks loan performance for franchise brands. No-H2o has 4 SBA-backed loans on record. A lower default rate generally indicates that lenders view the franchise as a safer investment, though past performance does not guarantee future results.
Next Steps
Talk to current No-H2o franchise owners
Get verified franchisee phone numbers for due diligence
See full No-H2o research
Risk analysis, unit growth, contract terms, and more
Compare No-H2o to similar franchises
Side-by-side investment, revenue, and risk comparison