Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict

How Much Does a Inner Image Transitional Sober Living Franchise Cost?

Data from the 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document

Investment Summary

Total Investment

$69K – $105K

Franchise Fee

$40K

Royalty

5.0%

Ad Fund

0.0%

Cost Breakdown

Initial Franchise Fee

The initial franchise fee for Inner Image Transitional Sober Living is $40K. This one-time payment covers the right to operate under the brand, access to proprietary systems, and initial training programs.

Total Investment Range

Opening a Inner Image Transitional Sober Living franchise requires a total investment of $69K – $105K. This range typically includes real estate or leasehold improvements, equipment and fixtures, initial inventory, signage, insurance, and working capital to sustain operations during the ramp-up period.

Working capital alone ranges from $5K to $10K.

Ongoing Costs

Beyond the initial investment, Inner Image Transitional Sober Living franchisees pay ongoing fees. The royalty fee is 5.0% of gross sales (Gross Revenues). The advertising or brand fund contribution is 0.0% of gross sales. There is also a technology fee of $400.

Net Worth & Liquid Capital Requirements

Inner Image Transitional Sober Living requires working capital of $5K – $10K to cover initial operating expenses. This is the liquid cash you should have available beyond the franchise fee and buildout costs.

What Can You Earn?

Inner Image Transitional Sober Living does not disclose earnings data in Item 19 of its Franchise Disclosure Document. Not all franchisors choose to publish financial performance representations, though this is a data point many prospective franchisees consider important.

Next Steps

Talk to current Inner Image Transitional Sober Living franchise owners

Get verified franchisee phone numbers for due diligence

See full Inner Image Transitional Sober Living research

Risk analysis, unit growth, contract terms, and more

Compare Inner Image Transitional Sober Living to similar franchises

Side-by-side investment, revenue, and risk comparison