Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Tim Ho Wan Full-Service Restaurants Remove | Barrio Queen Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $3.2M – $3.8M | $1.3M – $5.5M |
Liquid capital | $300K – $360K | $5K – $10K |
Franchise fee | $86K | $50K |
Royalty rate | 3.0% | 5.0% |
Ad fund rate | N/A | 1.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | N/A | $4.8M |
Median gross sales | N/A | $4.9M |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | BAbove Average | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 60 / 100 | 46 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | N/A |
SBA loans on record | N/A | 6 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 6 | 7 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | N/A | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | N/A | 355 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 6 | 7 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Tim Ho Wan vs Barrio Queen editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →