Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | The Modern Halo Full-Service Restaurants Remove | Fusabowl Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $283K – $648K | $304K – $627K |
Liquid capital | $51K – $128K | $90K – $150K |
Franchise fee | $50K | $40K |
Royalty rate | 6.0% | 3.0% |
Ad fund rate | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $931K | N/A |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | N/A |
Earnings metric | assumed annual | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | BAbove Average |
Risk score | 50 / 100 | 59 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | N/A |
SBA loans on record | 2 | N/A |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 2 | 7 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 10 | 5 |
Initial training (hrs) | 59 | 121 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 16 | 1 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the The Modern Halo vs Fusabowl editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →