Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Sauce on the Side Full-Service Restaurants Remove | Burger Village Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $494K – $794K | $484K – $802K |
Liquid capital | $30K – $50K | $40K – $55K |
Franchise fee | $35K | $40K |
Royalty rate | 5.0% | 5.0% |
Ad fund rate | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $985K | N/A |
Median gross sales | $946K | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | $68K | N/A |
Earnings metric | EBITDA | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | ATop Quintile | BAbove Average |
Risk score | 36 / 100 | 59 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | N/A |
SBA loans on record | N/A | N/A |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 12 | 7 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 200 | 147 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 11 | 17 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Sauce on the Side vs Burger Village editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →