Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Protein Bar & Kitchen Full-Service Restaurants Remove | Tay Ho Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $370K – $685K | $338K – $721K |
Liquid capital | $15K – $25K | $41K – $71K |
Franchise fee | $40K | $30K |
Royalty rate | 6.0% | 3.5% |
Ad fund rate | 2.0% | 1.0% |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | $1.3M | N/A |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | $191K | N/A |
Earnings metric | EBITDAR | Not classified |
| Risk | ||
Rating | CAverage | BAbove Average |
Risk score | 65 / 100 | 57 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | N/A |
SBA loans on record | N/A | 4 |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 16 | 7 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | 5 | 10 |
Initial training (hrs) | 240 | 164 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 3 | 21 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Protein Bar & Kitchen vs Tay Ho editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →