Compare
2 brands side-by-side
Compare up to 4 brands side by side
indicates the clear winner per row. Ties and missing data are not highlighted.
| Brand | Café 86 Full-Service Restaurants Remove | B Nutritious Full-Service Restaurants Remove |
|---|---|---|
| Vitals | ||
Investment range | $230K – $468K | $248K – $451K |
Liquid capital | $35K – $70K | $15K – $30K |
Franchise fee | $45K | $50K |
Royalty rate | 6.0% | 5.0% |
Ad fund rate | 1.0% | N/A |
| Performance | ||
Avg gross sales | N/A | $575K |
Median gross sales | N/A | N/A |
Avg owner earnings Metric varies by brand. Check type below | N/A | $141K |
Earnings metric | Not classified | Net Income |
| Risk | ||
Rating | CAverage | ATop Quintile |
Risk score | 67 / 100 | 33 / 100 |
SBA charge-off rate | N/A | N/A |
SBA loans on record | N/A | N/A |
| Scale | ||
Total units | 17 | 2 |
Net change (latest yr) | N/A | N/A |
Turnover rate | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Contract | ||
Initial term (years) | 10 | 10 |
Renewal term (years) | N/A | 5 |
Initial training (hrs) | 146 | 87 |
| Contacts | ||
Franchisee phones | 14 | 19 |
Looking for a detailed head-to-head breakdown?
Read the Café 86 vs B Nutritious editorial comparison →Need franchisee contacts for these brands?
Save with a contact bundle →