Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
USA Ninja Challenge logo

USA Ninja Challenge Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Health & FitnessNHFranchising since 2015
BAbove averageAbove average53/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$413K – $644K
Disclosed sales
$304K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Limited · 31 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02862FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent91%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Exclusive territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

USA Ninja Challenge is a youth fitness franchise running ninja-warrior obstacle training gyms with classes, camps, and parties. Franchisees run the facilities, managing instructors, safety, and enrollment.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A USA Ninja Challenge franchise requires a total initial investment of $413K – $644K, including a $60K franchise fee and an ongoing 7.5% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $304K[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: 2025 filing · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - a newer filing may exist

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$413K – $644K
77th pct Health & Fitn…
Avg gross sales
$304K
Outlet subset8th pct Health & Fitn…
Royalty
7.5%
69th pct Health & Fitn…
Units
32
63rd pct Health & Fitn…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Health & Fitness · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$413K – $644K
Median $392K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$60K – $60K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$60K – $60K
Median $35K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$304K
Median $477K
below median ↓, worse than category
Outlet subset
Royalty Rate
7.5%
Median 7.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
9.0% of rev
Median 9.0%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Limited · 31 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 31 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units
System Size
32 units
Median 17 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 0.0%
Territory
Exclusive
No other outlet of the brand may open inside it
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Health & Fitness median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $413K – $644K including a $60K franchise fee, 7.5% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $304K/year (median $261K) (reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 53/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +7 franchised outlets in the latest year (7 opened, 0 closed) (Item 20).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 47.6% CAGR over 3 years with 32 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Ninja Franchising, Inc.
CEO title
Managing Member
Dale Grant
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
14 Chenell Drive, Concord, NH 03301
Auditor
Kezos & Dunlavy, LLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$2.7M
vs $1.5M prior year

Overview

About

CEO
Dale Grant
Headquarters
NH
Founded
2015
FDD year
2025
States available
14

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 35% above the typical health & fitness franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$413K – $644KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 17 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$60,000Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 15 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Royalty7.5%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 11 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund1.5%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 11 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$60K – $60K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

USA Ninja Challenge: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$60K$60K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$60K$60K
Equipment, build-out, other$293K$524K
Total initial investment$413K$644K

Source: USA Ninja Challenge 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$413K – $644K
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$60K – $60K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$60K – $60K
Bottom third — review vs category
Royalty
7.5%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
1.5%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
9.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

USA Ninja Challenge: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty7.5% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund1.5% of gross sales
Transfer fee$15K
Renewal fee$0
Total fee load9.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 36% below the health & fitness norm.

Avg gross sales$304K

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 36 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$261KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 36 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typeGross Income
Sample size18 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for USA Ninja Challenge until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$589K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one USA Ninja Challenge unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $304,147 per unit — Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Adjust to a franchisee figure before relying on this.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $413K–$644K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $60K–$60K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$589K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Avg gross sales
$304K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$261K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
Gross Income
Sample size
18 outlets
vs category median 11
Range (low → high)
$98K→$664KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 36 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank8th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank77th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank69th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank63th
vs Health & Fitness peers
Risk score rank33th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 173 Health & Fitness brands

Showing the headline figures — all 146 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →
Revenue insight

Revenue is only 0.6x the investment. This means each unit may take 5+ years to recoup the initial outlay at typical margins.

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $304K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 0.6x. Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 9.0% (near the Health & Fitness median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 47.6% CAGR over 3 years across 32 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Health & Fitness medians

How USA Ninja Challenge Compares

Metric
USA Ninja Challenge
Category median
vs median
Investment
$529K
$392Kmiddle half $226K–$620K · n=172
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$304K
$477Kmiddle half $316K–$739K · n=65
Below median, worse than category
Unit Count
32
17middle half 5–70 · n=171
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Health & Fitness brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units32Verified — printed on page 37 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+47.6% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
32
Opened
7
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
97%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+47.6%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+47.6%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
5
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Transfer rate
15.6%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Ceased ops
3.1%
Units that stopped operating
2022
21
Franchised units
2023
24+3
Franchised units
2024
31+7
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 23 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 23 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

55 current owners across 23 states.

  • TX 6
  • CA 5
  • FL 5
  • OH 5
  • NH 4
  • PA 4
  • MA 3
  • NC 3
  • TN 3
  • CO 2
  • CT 2
  • GA 2
  • +11 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 1 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

Growth insight

Fast growth in a small system. Newer franchisors expanding quickly may not yet have the support infrastructure of larger systems.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
31
Loan volume
$10.5M
Median loan
$225K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
Limited · 31 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 31 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Limited · 31 loans
5-yr charge-off
Limited · 31 loans
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
17
Defaults
1
Typical loan rate
8.7%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
15.8%
n=7,965 loans
Jobs supported
161
2.0 per loan
Lender concentration
32%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 96% went to startups / new businesses, 4% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in fitness and recreational sports centers, franchised businesses charge off at 15.8% vs 18.2% for independents — franchising is associated with 13% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing USA Ninja Challenge franchisees

The Huntington National Bank8 loans0.0%
Citizens Bank3 loans0.0%
Simmons Bank2 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 17 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
1
Loan volume
$71K
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
14

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for USA Ninja Challenge from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
0.9%
Avg SBA guarantee
73%
Avg interest rate
8.68%
Avg chargeoff amount
$77K
Lender concentration
32.0%
Job velocity
2.0 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
12.5%
NAICS 713940
Jobs supported
161

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 32% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1The Huntington National Bank8$1.5M0.0%
2Citizens Bank3$1.9M0.0%
3Simmons Bank2$450K0.0%
4Stearns Bank National Association1$103K100.0%
5Cyprus Federal Credit Union1$150K0.0%
6KeyBank National Association1$150KN/A
7Magyar Bank1$400KN/A
8Community Bank of Santa Maria1$454KN/A
9Frost Bank1$182K0.0%
10CDC Small Business Finance Corp.1$180KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
TXTexas700.0%
OHOhio500.0%
CACalifornia30--
GAGeorgia20--
PAPennsylvania20--
FLFlorida11100.0%
MDMaryland10--
NJNew Jersey10--
TNTennessee10--
UTUtah100.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2018
3
2019
2
2020
2
2021
1
2022
5
2023
1
2024
5
2025
5
2026
1

Borrower profile

Startup22 (88%)
New (< 2 yr)2 (8%)
Existing (2+ yr)1 (4%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offLimited · 31 loans
Verdict score53/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average53Verdict score 53/100

Negative franchisor net worth of -$141,063, but the company is profitable with net income of $203,694 on $2.74M revenue and growing (47.6% net growth, 32 units). No litigation, bankruptcy, or going-concern doubt; Item 19 disclosed. Negative equity is the single concern, offset by positive earnings.

High confidence±4 pts
4957

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation required to be disclosed

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Kezos & Dunlavy, LLC

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $2.7MYr 2: $1.5M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Franchisor total operating revenue for FY2024 was $2,743,342 (includes equipment sales, initial franchise fees, royalties, marketing/technology fees). Net worth is negative (members' deficit of $141,063) as of 12/31/2024.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 53 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORNegative franchisor net worth: -$141,063
  2. 02MINORPositive net income: $203,694 on $2.74M revenue
  3. 03MINOR32 units, 47.6% net growth, 0% turnover
  4. 04MINORfinancial_distress flag set but earnings are positive; no going-concern

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 146 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 9.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryExclusive (favorable vs category)
Initial training122 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeExclusive territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹYes
Territory population100,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ25 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ2
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Arbitration locationConcord, New Hampshire
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawNew Hampshire
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation required to be disclosed

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
122 hrs
On-the-job training
0 hrs
Training location
franchisee location
Ongoing training
Required
Field support
32 hrs/yr
On-site visits per year
Time to open
15 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee (subject to franchisor approval)
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

56 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 56 contacts · $49
Free preview
(603) 935-••••NH
Unlock all 56 contacts
(901) 481-••••TN
(513) 739-••••OH
(603) 417-••••NH
(860) 736-••••CT

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a USA Ninja Challenge franchise?

The total investment to open a USA Ninja Challenge franchise ranges from $413K – $644K, with an initial franchise fee of $60K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do USA Ninja Challenge franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the USA Ninja Challenge FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $304K. The median is $261K. Important context: Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns USA Ninja Challenge?

USA Ninja Challenge is franchised by Ninja Franchising, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the USA Ninja Challenge FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the USA Ninja Challenge FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is USA Ninja Challenge's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for USA Ninja Challenge (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many USA Ninja Challenge franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, USA Ninja Challenge has 32 total units in the United States, including 31 franchised units and 1 company-owned units. 7 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is USA Ninja Challenge a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates USA Ninja Challenge as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 53 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent USA Ninja Challenge, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Health & Fitness franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Health & Fitness category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.