FranchiseVerdict
The James logo
F82/100FDD 2026

The James — Litigation & Risk

Lodging - Hotels & Motels · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5

Back to overview

Elevated Risk

22 cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.

Source: FDD Items 3–5

FDD Items 3 & 4

Litigation Metrics

Cases disclosed
22
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Overall risk score
82 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite
Rating
AVOID
STRONG / MODERATE / CAUTION / AVOID

7(a) FOIA data · FY2020–present

SBA Loan Performance

Aggregated from public SBA 7(a) loan disclosures. Default rate is the share of loans that were charged off or settled for less than the full balance.

Total 7(a) loans
13
Government-backed loans issued
Default rate
0.0%
vs <3% typical · system-wide
5-yr default rate
Defaults
0 loans
Loans charged off or defaulted

FDD Items 5, 6 & 17 — what you give up

Contract Risk Indicators

Mandatory arbitration
Required
Disputes resolved outside court — limits your legal options
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
Massachusetts
State whose law governs disputes — relevant if you're not based there

What drove the 82/100 rating

Risk Score Breakdown

  1. 01HIGHGoing Concern status FALSE indicates franchisor financial instability and potential business failure risk
  2. 02MINORZero operating franchise units with unknown growth trajectory suggests failed or non-existent franchise system
  3. 03HIGHExtensive litigation including stockholder suits, trademark disputes, breach of contract, and collection actions against former franchisees indicates systemic operational and legal problems
  4. 04MINORNo average revenue or net income disclosure prevents ROI validation and suggests poor or unreliable performance data
  5. 05MINORUnprotected territory creates direct competition risk from other franchisees with no geographic exclusivity
  6. 06MEDHigh $3.165M investment requirement with no disclosed returns, unit growth, or financial performance metrics
  7. 07MINORCollection actions against former franchisees indicates payment difficulties and potential franchise failure pattern

Severity inferred from FDD text — not a regulatory or legal classification

Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice — consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.