FranchiseVerdict
Doc Popcorn logo
F80/100FDD 2025

Doc Popcorn — Litigation & Risk

Retail · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5

Back to overview

Lower Risk

No litigation cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.

Source: FDD Items 3–5

FDD Items 3 & 4

Litigation Metrics

Cases disclosed
0
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Overall risk score
80 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite
Rating
AVOID
STRONG / MODERATE / CAUTION / AVOID

7(a) FOIA data · FY2020–present

SBA Loan Performance

Aggregated from public SBA 7(a) loan disclosures. Default rate is the share of loans that were charged off or settled for less than the full balance.

Total 7(a) loans
8
Government-backed loans issued
Default rate
50.0%
vs <3% typical · system-wide
5-yr default rate
Defaults
4 loans
Loans charged off or defaulted
Total loan volume
$951K
Avg loan size
$119K
Participating lenders
4

FDD Items 5, 6 & 17 — what you give up

Contract Risk Indicators

Mandatory arbitration
Required
Disputes resolved outside court — limits your legal options
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
Oklahoma
State whose law governs disputes — relevant if you're not based there

What drove the 80/100 rating

Risk Score Breakdown

  1. 01MINORMinimal unit growth of 3.9% YoY suggests stagnating system expansion and weak recruitment
  2. 02MEDNo average revenue or net income disclosed in Item 19 prevents realistic ROI modeling and earnings validation
  3. 03MINORUnprotected territory creates direct competition risk from other Doc Popcorn franchisees in same market
  4. 04MINORWide investment range ($175K-$413K) lacks clarity on what drives cost variation and total investment requirements
  5. 05MINOR5-year term is shorter than industry standard (10 years), creating renewal uncertainty and reinvestment pressure
  6. 06MED6% royalty combined with undisclosed profitability makes franchise economics unverifiable

Severity inferred from FDD text — not a regulatory or legal classification

Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice — consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.