Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
ASCEND HOTEL COLLECTION logo
AStrongest tier84/100FDD 2024

Ascend Hotel Collection: Litigation & Risk

Lodging · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5

Back to overview

Elevated Risk

7 cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.

Source: FDD Items 3–5

FDD Items 3 & 4

Litigation Metrics

Cases disclosed
7
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Verdict score
84 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite · higher is better
Rating
A
A / B / C / D / F verdict grade

7(a) FOIA data · FY2020–present

SBA Loan Performance

Aggregated from public SBA 7(a) loan disclosures. Charge-off rate is the share of loans that were charged off or settled for less than the full balance.

Total 7(a) loans
32
Government-backed loans issued
Charge-off rate
0.0%
vs 16% franchise average
5-yr charge-off rate
0.0%
Defaults
0 loans
Loans charged off or defaulted
Total loan volume
$95.3M
Avg loan size
$3.0M
Participating lenders
16

FDD Items 5, 6 & 17: What You Give Up

Contract Risk Indicators

Mandatory arbitration
Required
Disputes resolved outside court, limits your legal options
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
No
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
MD
State whose law governs disputes. Relevant if you're not based there

Extracted from FDD Item 3

Litigation Detail

3 pending matters: (1) Norma Knuth class action in Canada re destination marketing fees; (2) Jai Sai Baba multi-plaintiff RICO/franchise law suit (stayed, in arbitration); (3) T&T Management breach of contract/data misappropriation. Resolved: Wydredge (settled 2014), Sender Kohl ($85K settlement 2021), Highmark Lodging ($779K judgment against Choice 2024), Dahya Investments (mixed award). Large volume of 2023 royalty collection arbitrations by franchisor against franchisees.

What drove the 84/100 verdict

Risk Score Breakdown

  1. 01MINORMinimal system growth (1.7% YoY) with only 177 units suggests stagnation or contraction pressure
  2. 02MINORMultiple active class action lawsuits regarding destination marketing fees and discriminatory practices indicate systemic franchisor issues affecting profitability
  3. 03MINOR61 recovery actions initiated by franchisor in prior year suggests widespread franchisee defaults, payment disputes, or breach claims
  4. 04MINORNo Item 19 financial performance disclosure (Avg Revenue/Net Income not provided) prevents validation of unit economics
  5. 05MINORUnprotected territory exposes franchisees to direct brand competition and canibalization within same market
  6. 06MINORWide investment range ($187K–$11.8M) with unclear cost structure creates pricing opacity and unpredictable capital requirements
  7. 07MINOR5% royalty on gross room revenue (not net) penalizes franchisees during low-occupancy periods common in hospitality

Severity inferred from FDD text. Not a regulatory or legal classification

Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice. Consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.