A45/100FDD 2026
Anderson Longevity Clinic — Litigation & Risk
Health & Wellness - Other · FDD Items 3, 4 & 5
Lower Risk
No litigation cases disclosed in FDD Items 3 and 4.
Source: FDD Items 3–5
FDD Items 3 & 4
Litigation Metrics
Cases disclosed
0
Total from FDD Items 3 and 4
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
—
Franchisor or officer bankruptcy
Overall risk score
45 / 100
FranchiseVerdict composite
Rating
STRONG
STRONG / MODERATE / CAUTION / AVOID
FDD Items 5, 6 & 17 — what you give up
Contract Risk Indicators
Mandatory arbitration
Required
Disputes resolved outside court — limits your legal options
Jury trial waiver
Waived
You give up the right to a jury trial
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction on similar businesses
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Franchisor can open competing locations in or near your territory
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can match any purchase offer when you try to sell
Governing law
Florida
State whose law governs disputes — relevant if you're not based there
What drove the 45/100 rating
Risk Score Breakdown
- 01MEDNet income not disclosed in FDD — inability to verify profitability claims despite $2.76M average revenue
- 02MINOROnly 6 units system-wide with unknown growth trajectory — suggests early-stage or stalled expansion
- 03MINORHigh royalty burden: 8% of gross revenue PLUS $2,500/month minimum ($30K annually) creates cash flow pressure
- 04MINORWide investment range ($173K-$309K) indicates inconsistent startup costs and unclear unit economics
- 05MINORNo franchisee financial performance data (Item 19) prevents validation of advertised $2.76M revenue claims
- 06MINORLongevity/wellness sector has increasing regulatory scrutiny and clinical credibility questions
Severity inferred from FDD text — not a regulatory or legal classification
Litigation data from FDD Items 3, 4, and 5. SBA data from public 7(a) FOIA records (FY2020–present). Not legal advice — consult a franchise attorney before signing any franchise agreement.