Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Website Closers logo

Website Closers Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Real EstateFLFranchising since 2020
BAbove averageAbove average61/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$68K – $113K
Disclosed sales
$299K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02947FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent86%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Website Closers is a business brokerage franchise specializing in selling online, technology, and e-commerce businesses. Franchisees work as brokers, valuing businesses, listing them, and closing deals for commissions.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Website Closers franchise requires a total initial investment of $68K – $113K, including a $50K franchise fee. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $299K[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored6 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$68K – $113K
54th pct Real Estate
Avg gross sales
$299K
3rd pct Real Estate
Royalty
Not extracted
Units
27
22nd pct Real Estate
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Real Estate · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$68K – $113K
Median $133K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$50K – $50K
Median $30K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$15K – $40K
Median $22K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$299K
Median $384K
below median ↓, worse than category
Royalty Rate
Not extracted
Median 6.0%
Ongoing Fees
Not extracted
Median 7.5%
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
27 units
Median 70 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
14.8%
Median 7.5%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Real Estate median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $68K – $113K including a $50K franchise fee.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $299K/year (median $259K).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 61/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -2 franchised outlets in the latest year (2 opened, 4 closed) (Item 20).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Website Closers Franchise Company, LLC
Parent company
Website Closers, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2025 FDD
CEO title
Executive Director
Jason Guerrettaz
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
FL
HQ
550 N. Reo St, Suite 300, Tampa, FL 33609
Auditor
Naper CPA Group
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$6.3M
vs $8.8M prior year

Overview

About

CEO
Jason Guerrettaz
Headquarters
FL
Founded
2019
FDD year
2025
States available
14

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 32% below the typical real estate franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$68K – $113KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 19 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$50,000Verified — printed on page 11 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
RoyaltyNot extracted
Ad fund0.0%Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Working capital$15K – $40K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Website Closers: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$50K$50K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$15K$40K
Equipment, build-out, other$3K$23K
Total initial investment$68K$113K

Source: Website Closers 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$68K – $113K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$15K – $40K
Middle of category vs category
Franchise fee
$50K – $50K
Bottom third — review vs category
Royalty
Royalty is 50% of Net Commissions (reducible to 45%/40%/3…
Ad fund
0.0%
typical 3–5%

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Website Closers: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty (flat)50% of Net Commissions, reduced based on performance tiers from 30%-50%
Marketing / ad fund0.0%
Technology fee$0
Training fee$2K
Transfer fee$25K
Renewal fee$0

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 22% below the real estate norm.

Avg gross sales$299KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 41 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$259KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 41 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typeGross Commissions
Sample size25 franchisees

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Website Closers until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for royalty rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$118K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Website Closers unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $298,522 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $68K–$113K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $15K–$40K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for royalty rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$118K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for royalty rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$299K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$259K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
Gross Commissions
Sample size
25 franchisees
vs category median 53 · small
Range (low → high)
$17K→$1.8MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 41 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 0 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank3th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank54th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank
No comparison data
Unit count rank22th
vs Real Estate peers
Risk score rank31th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 101 Real Estate brands

Showing the headline figures — all 128 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $299K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 3.3x.

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System roughly stable (+4.0% 3-year CAGR) with 27 units.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Real Estate medians

How Website Closers Compares

Metric
Website Closers
Category median
vs median
Investment
$90K
$133Kmiddle half $78K–$190K · n=89
Below median, better than category
Revenue
$299K
$384Kmiddle half $254K–$616K · n=12
Below median, worse than category
Unit Count
27
70middle half 27–191 · n=89
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Real Estate brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units27Verified — printed on page 42 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth-7.1% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate14.8% (caution)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
27
Opened
2
Last reporting year
Closed
4
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
14.8%
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
96%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-7.1%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+4.0%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Ceased ops
14.8%
Units that stopped operating
2022
25
Franchised units
2023
28+3
Franchised units
2024
26-2
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 18 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 18 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

29 current owners across 18 states.

  • CA 4
  • FL 4
  • OH 3
  • PA 3
  • TX 2
  • AL 1
  • CO 1
  • GA 1
  • IL 1
  • MA 1
  • MN 1
  • NC 1
  • +6 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 1 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score61/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average61Verdict score 61/100

No litigation, bankruptcy, or going-concern; audited financials with Item 19 disclosed (avg gross sales $298,522). 27 units with modest 4% growth. Financial figures (net worth/income) not provided in the profile, the main gap.

Moderate confidence±13 pts
4874

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation required to be disclosed

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Naper CPA Group

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $6.3MYr 2: $8.8M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 61 / 100 verdict

  1. 01HIGHNo litigation, bankruptcy, or going-concern
  2. 02MEDItem 19 disclosed, avg gross sales $298,522
  3. 03MEDFranchisor net worth/income not disclosed in profile
  4. 04MINOR27 units, 4% net growth

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 128 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Initial term5 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training178 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term5 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ3
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population10,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ100 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ3
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationOrlando, Florida
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawFlorida
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation required to be disclosed

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
170 hrs
On-the-job training
8 hrs
Training location
franchisor's facilities and on-site
Ongoing training
Required
Field support
1 hrs/yr
On-site visits per year
Time to open
2 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee (home-based business); franchisor reviews/approves if not home office
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

30 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 30 contacts · $49
Free preview
(818) 406-••••CA
Unlock all 30 contacts
(949) 243-••••CA
(773) 255-••••IL
(904) 314-••••FL
(516) 581-••••NY

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Website Closers franchise?

The total investment to open a Website Closers franchise ranges from $68K – $113K, with an initial franchise fee of $50K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Website Closers franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Website Closers FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $299K. The median is $259K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Website Closers?

Website Closers is franchised by Website Closers Franchise Company, LLC. Its parent company is Website Closers, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Website Closers FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Website Closers FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Website Closers's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Website Closers (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Website Closers franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Website Closers has 27 total units in the United States, including 26 franchised units and 1 company-owned units. 2 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Website Closers a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Website Closers as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 61 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Website Closers, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Real Estate franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Real Estate category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.