Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Visiting Angels logo

Visiting Angels Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Senior CarePAFranchising since 1998
AStrongest tierStrongest tier80/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$125K – $171K
Disclosed sales
partial, no system average
SBA charge-off
0.0%
on 138 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02900FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent86%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Visiting Angels is a non-medical in-home senior-care franchise providing companionship and personal-care services. Franchisees run an agency recruiting and scheduling caregivers, placing them with families, and managing client relationships in a protected territory.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Visiting Angels franchise requires a total initial investment of $125K – $171K, including a $52K – $90K franchise fee and an ongoing 3.5% royalty[2]. The 2026 FDD on file does not yield a unit-revenue figure we can publish. SBA 7(a) loans show a 0.0% charge-off rate across 138 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored4 of 4 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$125K – $171K
71st pct Senior Care
Avg gross sales
N/A
Royalty
3.5%
3rd pct Senior Care
Units
541
94th pct Senior Care
SBA charge-off
0.0%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Senior Care · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$125K – $171K
Median $137K
near median
Franchise Fee
$52K – $90K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$50K – $50K
Median $38K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
Partial, no system average
No system average in Item 19
Royalty Rate
3.5%
Median 5.0%
below median ↓, better than category
Ongoing Fees
6.0% of rev
Median 7.0%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
0.0%
138 loans · Median 3.9%
below median ↓, better than category
System Size
541 units
Median 25 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
1.7%
Median 2.1%
below median ↓, better than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
5 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Senior Care median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $125K – $171K including a $52K franchise fee, 3.5% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNS2024 Revenue vs. Longevity Chart: 539 franchisees, cross-tabulated by 2024 annual revenue bucket (from $0-250K up to over $10M) against months since training completion (1-12 through 73+ months). Not a simple mean/median/quartile disclosure - it is a matrix of counts, so standard cohort quartile fields are not extractable in the schema's segment format.
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 80/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 0.0% across 138 loans (well below the franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +2 franchised outlets in the latest year (11 opened, 9 closed); 11 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • DATAItem 19 reports outlet revenue, but not in a form that yields a per-outlet average we can compare across brands. Ask franchisees directly for full unit-level revenue.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Living Assistance Services, Inc.
CEO title
President/CEO
Lawrence Meigs
Incorporated in
DE
HQ
937 Haverford Road, Suite 200, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010
Auditor
John D. Hilcher
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$58.0M
vs $52.8M prior year

Overview

About

CEO
Lawrence Meigs
Headquarters
PA
Founded
1998
FDD year
2026
States available
50

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 9% above the typical senior care franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$125K – $171KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 26 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$51,950Verified — printed on page 12 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty3.5%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 13 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fundNot extracted
Working capital$50K – $50K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2026 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Visiting Angels: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$52K$52K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$50K$50K
Equipment, build-out, other$24K$69K
Total initial investment$125K$171K

Source: Visiting Angels 2026 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$125K – $171K
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$50K – $50K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$52K – $90K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
3.5%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.5% of your Gross Revenues if higher
Total fee load
6.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Visiting Angels: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty3.5% of gross sales
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$10K
Total fee load6.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Avg gross salesNot extracted
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size550 franchisees

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

No Item 19 revenue figure for Visiting Angels is on file. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Visiting Angels unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $125K–$171K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $50K–$50K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$198K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

2024 Revenue vs. Longevity Chart: 539 franchisees, cross-tabulated by 2024 annual revenue bucket (from $0-250K up to over $10M) against months since training completion (1-12 through 73+ months). Not a simple mean/median/quartile disclosure - it is a matrix of counts, so standard cohort quartile fields are not extractable in the schema's segment format.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
550 franchisees
vs category median 22 · large
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2024
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank71th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank3th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank94th
vs Senior Care peers
Risk score rank15th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 79 Senior Care brands

Showing the headline figures — all 122 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 6.0% (near the Senior Care median).

Disclosure

Item 19 reports outlet revenue, but not in a form that yields a per-outlet average we can compare across brands.

Operator retention

System roughly stable (+1.3% 3-year CAGR) with 541 units.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Senior Care medians

How Visiting Angels Compares

Metric
Visiting Angels
Category median
vs median
Investment
$148K
$137Kmiddle half $110K–$185K · n=78
Near median
Revenue
N/A
$1.1Mmiddle half $796K–$1.4M · n=31
N/A
Unit Count
541
25middle half 6–172 · n=78
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Senior Care brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units541Verified — printed on page 66 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth-1.1% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate1.7% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
541
Opened
11
Last reporting year
Closed
9
Terminated
6
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
1
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
1.7%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-1.1%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+1.3%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
6
Not renewed
1
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
11
0.02 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
7
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2023
538
Franchised units
2024
539+1
Franchised units
2025
541+2
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 7 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 7 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

98 current owners across 7 states.

  • CA 59
  • CO 12
  • AZ 10
  • AL 7
  • CT 5
  • AR 4
  • AK 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

A
SBA Lending Health
Excellent SBA lending record · 0.0% charge-off
Total loans
138
Loan volume
$61.2M
Median loan
$150K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
0.0%
on 138 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
100.0%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
60
Defaults
0
Typical loan rate
7.1%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
7.5%
brand beats franchise avg ↓
Jobs supported
6,740
11.0 per loan
Lender concentration
8%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 22% went to startups / new businesses, 78% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in home health care services, franchised businesses charge off at 7.5% vs 11.5% for independents — franchising is associated with 35% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

Visiting Angels charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Visiting Angels charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 14 vintages from 2004 to 2023. Rates range from 0.0% to 0.0%.0%5%10%'04'11'14'18'22'23

Top lenders financing Visiting Angels franchisees

The Huntington National Bank11 loans0.0%
Live Oak Banking Company11 loans0.0%
CIBC Bank USA10 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 60 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
7
Loan volume
$2.1M
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
111

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Visiting Angels from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
0.0%
Avg SBA guarantee
67%
Avg interest rate
7.08%
Lender concentration
8.0%
Job velocity
11.0 per $100K
Startup risk premium
0.0pp
NAICS benchmark
5.7%
NAICS 621610
Jobs supported
6,740

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 8% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1The Huntington National Bank11$2.9M0.0%
2Live Oak Banking Company11$7.5M0.0%
3CIBC Bank USA10$4.0M0.0%
4JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association7$841K0.0%
5Old National Bank7$4.4M0.0%
6American National Bank7$7.2M0.0%
7Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company6$4.6M0.0%
8UMB Bank, National Association4$489K0.0%
9First Commonwealth Bank4$2.6M0.0%
10SouthState Bank, National Association4$5.3MN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
OHOhio2200.0%
TXTexas1300.0%
MNMinnesota1000.0%
ILIllinois800.0%
MAMassachusetts800.0%
PAPennsylvania800.0%
CACalifornia700.0%
COColorado700.0%
FLFlorida500.0%
NVNevada500.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2003
1
2004
3
2005
4
2007
4
2008
2
2009
2
2011
4
2012
7
2013
7
2014
4
2015
4
2016
10
2017
4
2018
10
2019
6
2020
3
2021
13
2022
15
2023
7
2024
9
2025
15
2026
4

Borrower profile

Ownership change35 (43%)
Existing (2+ yr)24 (29%)
New (< 2 yr)12 (15%)
Startup6 (7%)
Established (5+ yr)2 (2%)
2-3 years2 (2%)
Unanswered1 (1%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

Lending insight

With a 0.0% charge-off rate across 138 loans, banks have historically viewed this brand favorably for lending.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 0.0% — 100% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off0.0% · 138 loans
Verdict score80/100 (higher is better)
Litigation5 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier80Verdict score 80/100

539-unit home care system with positive equity ($3.25M net worth, $3.33M net income, $52.8M revenue), Item 19 disclosed and audited. 4 cases over 10 years are typical liability/wrongful-death claims for a caregiver business, insurer-defended and low relative to system size.

High confidence±4 pts
7684

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

4 cases in last 10 years: (1) Vinchesi v. LASI et al. - client fall/malpractice claim, filed Jan 2025, insurer defending; (2) Jones/Snowdon v. LASI et al. - wrongful death claim re: caregiver timesheet policy, mediation underway; (3) Parker v. Stafford/Arnold/LASI - employee car accident third-party suit, insurer defending; (4) LAS v. Myers/Caregivers of Ohio and LAS v. Block - franchisor-initiated suits against former franchisees for breach of contract/trademark infringement, both settled ($7,500 and $10,000 paid by LAS; $25,000 paid to LAS respectively).

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · John D. Hilcher

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $58.0MYr 2: $52.8MTotal: $52.8M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 80 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINOR4 cases in 10 years, insurer-defended, normal for 539-unit home care
  2. 02MINORPositive equity $3.25M, net income $3.33M
  3. 03MEDItem 19 disclosed, audited, no bankruptcy/going-concern

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 122 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 6.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training26 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory sizeℹZip Codes
Online sales rightsRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ20 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Governing lawPennsylvania
Litigation count5
View Item 3 litigation summary

4 cases in last 10 years: (1) Vinchesi v. LASI et al. - client fall/malpractice claim, filed Jan 2025, insurer defending; (2) Jones/Snowdon v. LASI et al. - wrongful death claim re: caregiver timesheet policy, mediation underway; (3) Parker v. Stafford/Arnold/LASI - employee car accident third-party suit, insurer defending; (4) LAS v. Myers/Caregivers of Ohio and LAS v. Block - franchisor-initiated suits against former franchisees for breach of contract/trademark infringement, both settled ($7,500 and $10,000 paid by LAS; $25,000 paid to LAS respectively).

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
26 hrs
On-the-job training
0 hrs
Site selection
Franchisee selects; franchisor approves/disapproves
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
QuickBooks Online
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: QuickBooks Online

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

98 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 98 contacts · $49
Free preview
(858) 566-••••CA
Unlock all 98 contacts
(860) 349-••••CT
(720) 685-••••CO
(949) 328-••••CA
(661) 263-••••CA

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Visiting Angels franchise?

The total investment to open a Visiting Angels franchise ranges from $125K – $171K, with an initial franchise fee of $52K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Visiting Angels franchise owners earn?

Item 19 of the Visiting Angels FDD discloses figures for part of the system but no single average across all outlets. These are gross sales figures, not profit; the Revenue section shows what the filing reports and on what basis. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns Visiting Angels?

Visiting Angels is franchised by Living Assistance Services, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Visiting Angels FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Visiting Angels FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Visiting Angels's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Visiting Angels has a charge-off rate of 0.0% across 138 loans, meaning 0.0% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Visiting Angels franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Visiting Angels has 541 total units in the United States, including 541 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 11 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Visiting Angels a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Visiting Angels as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 80 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Visiting Angels, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Senior Care franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Senior Care category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.