FranchiseVerdict
Griswold logo
FV-01127·STRONGExcellent95

Griswold

Formerly known as Global Health Care

Health & Wellness - Senior CareFranchising since 1984Website
Investment
$100K – $181K
53rd pct Senior Care
Avg revenue
$2.1M
65th pct Senior Care
Royalty
4.0%
3rd pct Senior Care
Units
125
66th pct Senior Care
SBA default
0.0%
vs <3% typical

Bottom line

  • Total investment $100K – $181K including a $50K franchise fee, 4.0% ongoing royalty.
  • Average unit revenue of $2.1M/year (median $1.7M).
  • Rated STRONG with a risk score of 49/100. SBA loan default rate of 0.0% across 28 loans (below the industry average).
  • System growing at 20.0% CAGR over 3 years with 125 total units — strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Legal entity
Griswold International, LLC
Parent company
Griswold Investors, LLC
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
510 East Township Line Road, Suite 210, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania 19422
Auditor
RSM US LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$21.6M
vs $23.0M prior year

Yale framework · single-unit ROIC

Returns Analysis

Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.

The model · Yale framework

What would one Griswold unit return on the cash you put in?

Revenue · per unit, per year
$
FDD Item 19 reports $2,131,036
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fund
Royaltytyp 68%
%
Ad fundtyp 35%
%
Operating costs · category default: personal services
COGS
%
Labor
%
Rent / occupancy
%
Other operating
%
Total invested capital · what you actually put in
Initial investment
$
FDD Item 7: $100K–$181K
Working capital
$
FDD reports $27K–$81K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

253%

Above typical band (30–60%)

0%30–60% Yale band80%
ROIC above 100% usually means the revenue figure is a system-wide aggregate or top-cohort number rather than a single-unit average. Verify the "Revenue · per unit" field against the brand's FDD Item 19 detail tables before relying on this output.

Store EBITDA · annual
$490K
EBITDA margin
23.0%
Total invested
$194K
Payback
5 mo
Unit-level only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even Yale describes.

Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing

What would 25 Griswold units return on equity?

Edit assumptions

Equity IRR · 5-yr

25.0%

3.06× MOIC

Year-1 DSCR

3.37×

EBITDA ÷ debt service

Equity required

$18.9M

on $34.1M purchase

Total debt

$15.2M

SBA $5.0M + senior + seller note

SBA 7(a) request ($17.0M) exceeds the $5M program cap. Excess capped automatically; backfill via conventional or equity.

Overview

About

Griswold franchisees typically operate as service-based businesses (likely senior care, home services, or security monitoring based on brand name). Day-to-day operations involve managing service technicians or caregivers, scheduling client appointments, handling billing and collections on the $2.1M average revenue base, and responding to corporate compliance and reporting requirements.

CEO
Michael Slupecki
Founded
1982
FDD year
2025
States available
26

Item 7 · what it costs

The Vitals

Total investment
$100K – $181K
All-in to open one unit
Liquid capital
$27K – $81K
Cash you must have on hand
Franchise fee
$50K
Royalty
4.0%
Gross Receipts · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
Greater of $75 or 0.5% of Gross Receipts
Total fee load
4.5%
vs 9–13% typical

Item 19

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$2.1M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$1.7M
Item 19 type
Historical Gross Receipts
Sample size
48 units
vs category median 23 · large
Range (low → high)
$662K$7.5M
Cohort dispersion
Transparency
4 / 5
vs category median 4 / 5 · typical
Revenue rank65th
vs Health & Wellness - Senior Care peers
Investment cost rank53th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank3th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank66th
vs Health & Wellness - Senior Care peers
Risk score rank29th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
125
Opened
20
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Turnover rate
0.0%
Company-owned
11
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
91%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (yr3)
+20.0%
Net unit change last year
3-yr CAGR
+20.0%
Compounded over last 3 years
2023
114+19
Franchised units
2024
95
Franchised units
2025
95
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 23 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Registered · 23 states
Not registered

States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
28
Loan volume
Avg loan
Default rate
0.0%
vs <3% typical · system-wide
5-yr default

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17

Risk & Legal

49
Risk · 0-100
STRONG49 / 100

Griswold presents elevated risk due to undisclosed profitability data, active multi-jurisdictional litigation, and documented franchisee disputes, despite healthy unit growth that may mask operational or compliance problems.

Score breakdown · what drove the 49 / 100 rating

  1. 01HIGHMultiple active litigation cases including state regulatory investigations (Virginia, Indiana) and collective action wage claims—suggests systemic compliance or labor practice issues
  2. 02MEDNet income not disclosed in FDD despite $2.1M average revenue—inability or unwillingness to provide Item 19 profitability data is a major transparency red flag
  3. 03MINORPattern of franchisee disputes (Mull, Life Call Systems, Baton Rouge arbitration, MacPhee negligence claim)—indicates potential misrepresentation, breach, or operational support failures
  4. 04MINORStrong unit growth (20% YoY to 125 units) combined with hidden profitability metrics suggests aggressive recruitment possibly outpacing sustainable support
  5. 05MINORFranchise fee of $49,500 plus startup costs up to $180,600 represent significant capital at risk with unproven unit economics

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Territory
Population-based delineated by zip codes or geographic boundaries
Protected territory
Yes
Initial term
10 years
Renewal term
5 years
Online sales rights
Restricted
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Hire a manager?
Allowed
Litigation count
7
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can buy back on resale
Mandatory arbitration
Yes
Jury trial waiver
Yes
Non-compete
1 yrs
Post-termination restriction
Owner-operator
Required
Governing law
Pennsylvania

Item 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
71 hrs
On-the-job training
0 hrs
POS system
ClearCare
Operating tech stack

Item 20

Franchisee Contacts

Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.

Franchisee contacts

68 numbers

Locked
(210) 978-••••
TX
(281) 823-••••
TX
(734) 645-••••
MI

One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included

FDD download

Griswold · FDD (2025) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above