Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) logo

Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Health & FitnessTXFranchising since 2023
DBelow averageBelow average33/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$867K – $1.4M
Disclosed sales
$1.4M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02880FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent81%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Vaura is a boutique fitness franchise offering athletic reformer Pilates classes and personal training. Franchisees run the studios, managing instructors, class scheduling, and membership growth.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) franchise requires a total initial investment of $867K – $1.4M, including a $100K franchise fee and an ongoing 7.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $1.4M[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: D (Below average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: partial✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored5 of 6 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$867K – $1.4M
93rd pct Health & Fitn…
Avg gross sales
$1.4M
1 outlet
Royalty
7.0%
37th pct Health & Fitn…
Units
2
10th pct Health & Fitn…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Health & Fitness · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$867K – $1.4M
Median $392K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$100K – $100K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$60K – $100K
Median $35K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$1.4M
Median $477K
above median ↑, better than category
1 outlet
Royalty Rate
7.0%
Median 7.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
9.0% of rev
Median 9.0%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
2 units
Median 17 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
5 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Health & Fitness median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $867K – $1.4M including a $100K franchise fee, 7.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $1.4M/year.
  • RISKVerdict D (Below average), verdict score 33/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHNegative, pipeline stalled: 4 agreements signed but not yet open against 2 open outlets (Item 20).
  • FLAGRevenue data based on only 1 outlet. Treat as directional, not definitive. Ask franchisees directly for current unit economics.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Vaura Incorporated
Parent company
Vaura Holdings Incorporated
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2026 FDD
Ultimate parent
F45 Training Holdings Inc. dba FIT House of Brands
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2026 FDD
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Thomas Dowd
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
3601 South Congress Avenue, Building E, Austin, TX 78704
Auditor
Grant Thornton LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$311K
vs $38K prior year

Affiliated brands

  • Surf and Turf Holdings Pty Ltd

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 8

2 other brands on this site name F45 Training Holdings Inc. dba FIT House of Brands as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2026 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Thomas Dowd
Headquarters
TX
Founded
2023
FDD year
2026
States available
2

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 183% above the typical health & fitness franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$867K – $1.4MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 29 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$100,000Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Royalty7.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 20 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 20 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$60K – $100K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown25 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Establishment Fee$100K$100K
Document Preparation Fee$3K$3K
Equipment Pack$186K$186K
Promotional Merchandise$3K$3K
Equipment Pack Shipping, Taxes and Duties$0$27K
Induction Seminar$2K$2K
Head Trainer Induction$600$600
Travel and Living Expenses during Training$5K$9K
Real Property$5K$25K
Architectural Floor Plan Design, Engineering, and Construction/Permit Documents$28K$45K
Leasehold Improvements$339K$650K
Utility Deposits$1K$2K
Exterior and Interior Signage$30K$38K
Furniture, Flooring, Fixtures, Other Equipment$23K$27K
Office Equipment and Supplies$1K$3K
Computer System$1K$2K
Business Licenses and Permits$1K$3K
On-site Training Fee$11K$15K
Professional Services$1K$5K
Insurance$1K$4K
Total initial investment$868K$1.4M

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$867K – $1.4M
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$60K – $100K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$100K – $100K
Bottom third — review vs category
Royalty
7.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
9.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates): Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty7.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$500
Transfer fee$25K
Renewal fee$25K
Total fee load9.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 195% above the health & fitness norm.

Avg gross sales$1.4M

Based on a single outlet - not a system average

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 67 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size1 outlet

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$1.2M

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,405,093 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $867K–$1.4M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $60K–$100K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$1.2M
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Based on a single outlet - not a system average

Avg gross sales
$1.4M
Per unit/yr · from the Item 19 franchised-cohort breakdown (no single system-wide average disclosed)

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
1 outlet
vs category median 11 · small
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
3 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · below
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank93th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank37th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank10th
vs Health & Fitness peers
Risk score rank93th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 173 Health & Fitness brands

Showing the headline figures — all 154 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $1.4M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.3x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 9.0% (near the Health & Fitness median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 3/10 — moderate disclosure depth. Average and range data are available but detailed cohort breakdowns may be limited. Sample size of 1 outlet — treat as directional only.

Operator retention

Net unit growth of +100.0% over 3 years (1 opened, 0 closed).

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Health & Fitness medians

How Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) Compares

Metric
Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates)
Category median
vs median
Investment
$1.1M
$392Kmiddle half $226K–$620K · n=172
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$1.4M
$477Kmiddle half $316K–$739K · n=65
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
2
17middle half 5–70 · n=171
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Health & Fitness brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units2Verified — printed on page 69 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth+100.0% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
2
Opened
1
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+100.0%
Net unit change over 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
4
2.00 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
0
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2023
0
Franchised units
2024
1+1
Franchised units
2025
2+1
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 2 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

2

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

Growth insight

Fast growth in a small system. Newer franchisors expanding quickly may not yet have the support infrastructure of larger systems.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score33/100 (higher is better)
Litigation5 cases · none name the franchisor
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

DBelow average33Verdict score 33/100

Small Pilates franchisor (2 units, began 2023) with negative net worth -$227,541 and net loss -$46,548 on $311,263 revenue. Five disclosed matters involve affiliate F45 Training, incl. a $1.5M settled franchisee suit and two Washington State consent orders for FDD/FIPA violations. Concerns stacked but litigation is affiliate-level.

Moderate confidence±13 pts
2046

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation against Vaura Incorporated itself is required to be disclosed. Five matters involving affiliate F45 Training Incorporated are disclosed: a franchisee lawsuit (Functional HIIT Fitness) settled in 2024 with $1.5M in payments; two Washington State Consent Orders (2022, 2023) for FDD/FIPA violations; a Michigan Attorney General settlement ($95,000 plus rescission offers); and a California Consent Order ($152,500 penalty) for unlawful financial performance representations.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Grant Thornton LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $0.3MYr 2: $0.0MTotal: $0.3MNon-royalty: $0.1M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: No
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 33 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORNegative net worth -$227,541
  2. 02MINORNet loss -$46,548
  3. 03MINOR5 affiliate (F45) matters incl. $1.5M settlement and 2 regulatory consent orders
  4. 04MINOROnly 2 units

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 154 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 9.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training120 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population15,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ5 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ1
Curable defaultsℹ2
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawTexas
Litigation count5
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation against Vaura Incorporated itself is required to be disclosed. Five matters involving affiliate F45 Training Incorporated are disclosed: a franchisee lawsuit (Functional HIIT Fitness) settled in 2024 with $1.5M in payments; two Washington State Consent Orders (2022, 2023) for FDD/FIPA violations; a Michigan Attorney General settlement ($95,000 plus rescission offers); and a California Consent Order ($152,500 penalty) for unlawful financial performance representations.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
110 hrs
On-the-job training
10 hrs
Training location
On-site and off-site
Ongoing training
Optional
Site selection
Franchisor accepts/approves site selected by franchisee within Designated Area
Franchisor financing
Offered
Item 10
POS system
MindBody
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: MindBody

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) franchise?

The total investment to open a Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) franchise ranges from $867K – $1.4M, with an initial franchise fee of $100K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.4M. Important context: Based on a single outlet - not a system average. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates)?

Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) is franchised by Vaura Incorporated. Its parent company is Vaura Holdings Incorporated. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is F45 Training Holdings Inc. dba FIT House of Brands. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates)'s franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) has 2 total units in the United States, including 2 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 1 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates) as a D-grade franchise with a verdict score of 33 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Vaura (Athletic Reformer Pilates), you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Health & Fitness franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Health & Fitness category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.