FranchiseVerdict
Stretch Lab logo
FV-02466·STRONGExcellent95

Stretch Lab

Health & FitnessFranchising since 2017Website
Investment
$269K – $610K
52nd pct Health & Fitn…
Avg revenue
$556K
30th pct Health & Fitn…
Royalty
8.0%
55th pct Health & Fitn…
Units
485
96th pct Health & Fitn…
SBA default
0.0%
vs <3% typical

Bottom line

  • Total investment $269K – $610K including a $65K franchise fee, 8.0% ongoing royalty.
  • Average unit revenue of $556K/year (median $536K).
  • Rated STRONG with a risk score of 49/100. SBA loan default rate of 0.0% across 267 loans (below the industry average).
  • 13 litigation matters disclosed in Item 3 — higher than typical. Review the summary for patterns (franchisor-initiated vs. franchisee-initiated).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Legal entity
Stretch Lab Franchise SPV, LLC
Parent company
XPOF Assetco, LLC
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
17877 Von Karman Ave., Suite 100, Irvine, California 92614
Auditor
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$521K
vs $204.6M prior year

Yale framework · single-unit ROIC

Returns Analysis

Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.

The model · Yale framework

What would one Stretch Lab unit return on the cash you put in?

Revenue · per unit, per year
$
FDD Item 19 reports $556,263
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fund
Royaltytyp 68%
%
Ad fundtyp 35%
%
Operating costs · category default: fitness
COGS
%
Labor
%
Rent / occupancy
%
Other operating
%
Total invested capital · what you actually put in
Initial investment
$
FDD Item 7: $269K–$610K
Working capital
$
FDD reports $33K–$86K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

31%

In Yale's "attractive" band (30–60%)

0%30–60% Yale band80%

Store EBITDA · annual
$156K
EBITDA margin
28.0%
Total invested
$499K
Payback
38 mo
Unit-level only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even Yale describes.

Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing

What would 25 Stretch Lab units return on equity?

Edit assumptions

Equity IRR · 5-yr

41.6%

5.70× MOIC

Year-1 DSCR

2.07×

EBITDA ÷ debt service

Equity required

$3.2M

on $11.7M purchase

Total debt

$8.5M

SBA $5.0M + senior + seller note

SBA 7(a) request ($5.8M) exceeds the $5M program cap. Excess capped automatically; backfill via conventional or equity.

Overview

About

Stretch Lab franchisees operate boutique fitness studios offering assisted stretching and mobility services, primarily one-on-one and small group sessions led by trained practitioners. Day-to-day operations include managing front-desk scheduling, overseeing practitioner staff, maintaining studio facilities, and driving member retention through classes and retail offerings. Revenue streams include membership packages, drop-in classes, and ancillary services.

CEO
Mark King
Founded
2023
FDD year
2025
States available
45

Item 7 · what it costs

The Vitals

Total investment
$269K – $610K
All-in to open one unit
Liquid capital
$33K – $86K
Cash you must have on hand
Franchise fee
$65K
Royalty
8.0%
Gross Sales · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
10.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Item 19

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$556K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$536K
Item 19 type
Gross Revenue
Sample size
417 units
vs category median 12 · large
Range (low → high)
$12K$1.5M
Cohort dispersion
Transparency
4 / 5
vs category median 4 / 5 · typical
Revenue rank30th
vs Health & Fitness peers
Investment cost rank52th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank55th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank96th
vs Health & Fitness peers
Risk score rank14th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
485
Opened
71
Last reporting year
Closed
12
Turnover rate
2.5%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (yr3)
+13.3%
Net unit change last year
3-yr CAGR
+71.4%
Compounded over last 3 years
2023
485+55
Franchised units
2024
428
Franchised units
2025
283
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 9 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Registered · 9 states
Not registered

States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
267
Loan volume
Avg loan
Default rate
0.0%
vs <3% typical · system-wide
5-yr default

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17

Risk & Legal

49
Risk · 0-100
STRONG49 / 100

Stretch Lab operates under a parent company in bankruptcy with extensive litigation alleging franchise law violations; the absence of net income disclosure and modest unit growth create opacity around actual franchisee profitability and sustainability.

Score breakdown · what drove the 49 / 100 rating

  1. 01MINORParent company (Xponential Fitness) facing multiple securities class action lawsuits and regulatory scrutiny, creating systemic risk across all affiliate brands
  2. 02HIGHExtensive litigation from former franchisees across affiliate brands alleging franchise law violations and fraudulent inducement — suggests potential systemic issues in franchisor practices
  3. 03MEDNo Item 19 (average net income) disclosed despite $556,263 average revenue — inability or unwillingness to demonstrate profitability is a major transparency red flag
  4. 04MINOR8% royalty on gross sales with 10-year term creates high fixed costs regardless of profitability; lack of net income data makes ROI calculation impossible
  5. 05HIGHParent company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (going concern = False) — indicates severe financial distress and potential impact on franchisee support, marketing, and technology
  6. 06MINOR13.3% YoY unit growth appears modest for a wellness concept; growth rate masks whether expansion is driven by new franchisees or attrition replacement
  7. 07MINORMultiple pending lawsuits by franchisees from affiliated brands (Pure Barre, AKT, Yoga Six, Row House, CycleBar, BFT) suggest pattern of franchisor-franchisee disputes and potential legal precedent against the parent company

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Territory
Designated Territory
Protected territory
Yes
Initial term
10 years
Renewal term
10 years
Online sales rights
Granted
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Hire a manager?
Allowed
Litigation count
13
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can buy back on resale
Mandatory arbitration
Yes
Jury trial waiver
Yes
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction
Owner-operator
Optional
Governing law
California

Item 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
61 hrs
On-the-job training
32 hrs
POS system
ClubReady
Operating tech stack

Item 20

Franchisee Contacts

Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.

Franchisee contacts

79 numbers

Locked
(415) 972-••••
One Sansome Street, Ste.
CA
(323) 424-••••
CA
(480) 658-••••
AZ

One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included

FDD download

Stretch Lab · FDD (2025) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above