Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Stretch Lab logo

Stretch Lab Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Health & FitnessCAFranchising since 2017
BAbove averageAbove average66/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$269K – $610K
Disclosed sales
$556K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
6.9%
on 126 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02466FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent95%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

StretchLab is a boutique-wellness franchise offering assisted, one-on-one and group stretching to improve mobility and recovery. Franchisees run studios staffing trained flexologists and built on recurring membership packages.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Stretch Lab franchise requires a total initial investment of $269K – $610K, including a $65K franchise fee and an ongoing 8.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $556K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 6.9% charge-off rate across 126 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$269K – $610K
53rd pct Health & Fitn…
Avg gross sales
$556K
23rd pct Health & Fitn…
Royalty
8.0%
72nd pct Health & Fitn…
Units
485
95th pct Health & Fitn…
SBA charge-off
6.9%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Health & Fitness · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$269K – $610K
Median $392K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$65K – $65K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$33K – $86K
Median $35K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$556K
Median $477K
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
8.0%
Median 7.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
10.0% of rev
Median 9.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
6.9%
126 loans · Median 10.5%
below median ↓, better than category
System Size
485 units
Median 17 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
2.9%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
13 cases
Review carefully

Green = favorable by >10% vs Health & Fitness median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $269K – $610K including a $65K franchise fee, 8.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $556K/year (median $536K).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 66/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 6.9% across 126 loans (near or below the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +57 franchised outlets in the latest year (71 opened, 12 closed); 61 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • FLAGItem 4 discloses a bankruptcy of an officer or of a company an officer ran, not of the franchisor. Review Item 4 for details.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Stretch Lab Franchise SPV, LLC
Parent company
XPOF Assetco, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2025 FDD
Ultimate parent
Xponential Fitness, Inc. (NYSE: XPOF)
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
Stretch Lab Franchise, LLC
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Michael Nuzzo
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
17877 Von Karman Ave., Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92614
Auditor
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$204.6M
vs $521K prior year

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 8

9 other brands on this site name Xponential Fitness, Inc. (NYSE: XPOF) as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Portfolio: Xponential Fitness

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2025 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Michael Nuzzo
Headquarters
CA
Founded
2017
FDD year
2025
States available
45

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 12% above the typical health & fitness franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$269K – $610KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 29 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$65,000Verified — printed on page 20 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty8.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 22 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 22 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$33K – $86K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Stretch Lab: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$65K$65K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$33K$86K
Equipment, build-out, other$171K$459K
Total initial investment$269K$610K

Source: Stretch Lab 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$269K – $610K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$33K – $86K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$65K – $65K
Bottom third — review vs category
Royalty
8.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
10.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Stretch Lab: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty8.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$675
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$10K
Inventory (initial)$20K – $24K
Total fee load10.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 17% above the health & fitness norm.

Avg gross sales$556KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 74 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$536KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 74 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size417 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Stretch Lab until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$499K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Stretch Lab unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $556,263 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $269K–$610K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $33K–$86K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$499K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$556K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$536K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
417 outlets
vs category median 11 · large
Range (low → high)
$12K→$1.5MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 74 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
$313K→$842K
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank23th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank53th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank72th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank95th
vs Health & Fitness peers
Risk score rank12th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 173 Health & Fitness brands

Showing the headline figures — all 170 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $556K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.3x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 10.0% (near the Health & Fitness median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 227.7% CAGR over 3 years across 485 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Health & Fitness medians

How Stretch Lab Compares

Metric
Stretch Lab
Category median
vs median
Investment
$440K
$392Kmiddle half $226K–$620K · n=172
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$556K
$477Kmiddle half $316K–$739K · n=65
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
485
17middle half 5–70 · n=171
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Health & Fitness brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units485Verified — printed on page 80 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growthOutlier (see FDD) (caution)
Turnover rate2.9% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
485
Opened
71
Last reporting year
Closed
12
Terminated
2
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
2.9%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
Outlier (see FDD)
Likely small-sample artifact
3-yr CAGR
Outlier (see FDD)
Likely small-sample artifact

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
2
Not renewed
0
Transferred
44
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
61
0.13 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
63
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2022
283
Franchised units
2023
428+145
Franchised units
2024
485+57
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 45 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

45

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

54 current owners across 6 states.

  • YO 23
  • CA 13
  • JE 12
  • ME 3
  • DA 2
  • IS 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 282 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

A
SBA Lending Health
Excellent SBA lending record · 6.9% charge-off
Total loans
126
Loan volume
$29.8M
Median loan
$257K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
6.9%
on 126 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
93.1%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
44
Defaults
2
Typical loan rate
8.0%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
15.8%
brand beats franchise avg ↓
Jobs supported
2,185
7.3 per loan
Lender concentration
34%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 90% went to startups / new businesses, 10% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in fitness and recreational sports centers, franchised businesses charge off at 15.8% vs 18.2% for independents — franchising is associated with 13% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

Stretch Lab charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Stretch Lab charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 5 vintages from 2019 to 2023. Rates range from 0.0% to 20.0%.0%5%10%15%20%'19'20'21'22'23

Top lenders financing Stretch Lab franchisees

The Huntington National Bank43 loans0.0%
Stearns Bank National Association8 loans0.0%
Five Star Bank6 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 44 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Stretch Lab from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
0.3%
Avg SBA guarantee
70%
Avg interest rate
7.97%
Avg chargeoff amount
$39K
Lender concentration
34.1%
Job velocity
7.3 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
12.5%
NAICS 713940
Jobs supported
2,185

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 34% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1The Huntington National Bank43$7.5M0.0%
2Stearns Bank National Association8$1.4M0.0%
3Five Star Bank6$2.0M0.0%
4JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association4$598K66.7%
5KeyBank National Association4$985K0.0%
6Midwest Regional Bank3$841K0.0%
7Wells Fargo Bank National Association3$535K0.0%
8Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company3$275KN/A
9Dime Community Bank3$907KN/A
10United Community Bank3$907KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
CACalifornia1800.0%
TXTexas1300.0%
ILIllinois12266.7%
NYNew York1200.0%
OHOhio1100.0%
COColorado800.0%
INIndiana800.0%
FLFlorida600.0%
MIMichigan600.0%
NJNew Jersey60--

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2018
1
2019
16
2020
10
2021
13
2022
43
2023
25
2024
6
2025
11
2026
1

Borrower profile

Startup103 (82%)
New (< 2 yr)10 (8%)
Existing (2+ yr)6 (5%)
Unanswered4 (3%)
Ownership change3 (2%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 6.9% — 57% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off6.9% · 126 loans
Verdict score66/100 (higher is better)
Litigation13 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average66Verdict score 66/100

Large healthy Xponential-family brand: 485 franchised units, $204.6M revenue, $150.1M net income, $39.1M net worth, audited and Item 19 disclosed. 9 litigation matters is modest relative to a 485-unit system, and the disclosed bankruptcies are unrelated personal/former-employer Chapter 7/11 filings of executives, not the franchisor. Very low turnover (2.9%).

High confidence±4 pts
6270

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

Subject: an officer. An officer’s own bankruptcy or a company an officer ran, not the franchisor’s

Personal Chapter 7 bankruptcy of Xponential COO-North America Timothy Weiderhoft and spouse (filed Aug 2023, discharged Dec 2023, unrelated restaurant venture failed due to COVID-19); also Chapter 11 of Instant Brands Acquisition Holdings Inc. (former employer of CMO Louise Ocasion, unrelated to franchisor)

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Deloitte & Touche LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $204.6MYr 2: $0.5M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 66 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINOR9 suits normal for a 485-unit system
  2. 02MEDDisclosed bankruptcies are executives' unrelated personal/prior-employer filings
  3. 03MINORStrong financials: $204.6M revenue, $150.1M net income, $39.1M net worth
  4. 04MEDAudited, Item 19 disclosed, 2.9% turnover

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 170 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 10.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training93 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population15,000
Online sales rightsℹGranted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ10 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ15
Curable defaultsℹ10
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationWithin 50 miles of franchisor's then-current principal place of business (currently Irvine, California), via JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules & Procedures, or by videoconference if agreed
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawCalifornia
Litigation count13

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
61 hrs
On-the-job training
32 hrs
Ongoing training
Required
Site selection
franchisee proposes, franchisor approves
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
ClubReady
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Technology: ClubReady

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

336 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 336 contacts · $49
Free preview
210 267-••••
Unlock all 336 contacts
585-788-••••YO
513 659-••••
817-953-••••
516-545-••••YO

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Stretch Lab franchise?

The total investment to open a Stretch Lab franchise ranges from $269K – $610K, with an initial franchise fee of $65K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Stretch Lab franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Stretch Lab FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $556K. The median is $536K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Stretch Lab?

Stretch Lab is franchised by Stretch Lab Franchise SPV, LLC. Its parent company is XPOF Assetco, LLC. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is Xponential Fitness, Inc. (NYSE: XPOF). Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Stretch Lab FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Stretch Lab FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Stretch Lab's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Stretch Lab has a charge-off rate of 6.9% across 126 loans, meaning 6.9% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Stretch Lab franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Stretch Lab has 485 total units in the United States, including 485 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 71 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Stretch Lab a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Stretch Lab as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 66 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Stretch Lab, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Health & Fitness franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Health & Fitness category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.