FranchiseVerdict
Recovery Lab logo
FV-02116·STRONGExcellent95

Recovery Lab

Health & Wellness - OtherFranchising since 2024Website
Investment
$367K – $503K
72nd pct Other
Avg revenue
$768K
27th pct Other
Royalty
6.0%
16th pct Other
Units
3
14th pct Other
SBA default
0.0%
vs <3% typical

Bottom line

  • Total investment $367K – $503K including a $39K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • Average unit revenue of $768K/year (median $813K). Estimated payback in 2.0 years.
  • Rated STRONG with a risk score of 53/100. SBA loan default rate of 0.0% across 6 loans (below the industry average).
  • Auditor disclosed a going-concern note — flagged doubt about the franchisor's ability to continue operations. Verify against the latest FDD.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Legal entity
Recovery Lab Franchising LLC
Incorporated in
California
HQ
8351 Rochester Ave., Suite 108, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Auditor
Velez Hardy
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$0
vs $10K prior year
⚠ Going-concern note
Disclosed in FDD 2026
Auditor flagged doubt about continued operations. Verify against the latest FDD before deciding.

Yale framework · single-unit ROIC

Returns Analysis

Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.

The model · Yale framework

What would one Recovery Lab unit return on the cash you put in?

Revenue · per unit, per year
$
FDD Item 19 reports $768,058
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fund
Royaltytyp 68%
%
Ad fundtyp 35%
%
Operating costs · category default: personal services
COGS
%
Labor
%
Rent / occupancy
%
Other operating
%
Total invested capital · what you actually put in
Initial investment
$
FDD Item 7: $367K–$503K
Working capital
$
FDD reports $10K–$25K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

39%

In Yale's "attractive" band (30–60%)

0%30–60% Yale band80%

Store EBITDA · annual
$177K
EBITDA margin
23.0%
Total invested
$452K
Payback
31 mo
Unit-level only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even Yale describes.

Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing

What would 25 Recovery Lab units return on equity?

Edit assumptions

Equity IRR · 5-yr

39.7%

5.33× MOIC

Year-1 DSCR

2.13×

EBITDA ÷ debt service

Equity required

$3.6M

on $12.3M purchase

Total debt

$8.7M

SBA $5.0M + senior + seller note

SBA 7(a) request ($6.1M) exceeds the $5M program cap. Excess capped automatically; backfill via conventional or equity.

Overview

About

Recovery Lab franchisees operate recovery and wellness facilities (likely physical therapy, recovery services, or wellness centers) that generate approximately $768K in annual gross revenue. Day-to-day operations likely include managing client sessions, facility maintenance, staff scheduling, marketing, and billing while remitting 6% royalties to corporate.

CEO
Jose Luis “Louie” Zuniga
Founded
2024
FDD year
2026
States available
1

Item 7 · what it costs

The Vitals

Total investment
$367K – $503K
All-in to open one unit
Liquid capital
$10K – $25K
Cash you must have on hand
Franchise fee
$39K
Royalty
6.0%
Gross Sales · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
1.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
7.0%
vs 9–13% typical
Payback period
2.0 yrs
From v3 / Item 19

Item 19

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$768K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$813K
Item 19 type
Historic Gross Sales and Net Operating Income for Affiliate-Owned Studios
Sample size
3 units
vs category median 12 · small
Range (low → high)
$663K$829K
Cohort dispersion
Transparency
7 / 5
vs category median 4 / 5 · above
Revenue rank27th
vs Health & Wellness - Other peers
Investment cost rank72th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank16th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank14th
vs Health & Wellness - Other peers
Risk score rank29th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
3
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Turnover rate
0.0%
Company-owned
3
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
0%
vs corporate-owned
Multi-unit owners
10.0%
2024
0±0
Franchised units
2025
0
Franchised units
2026
0
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 13 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Registered · 13 states
Not registered

States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
6
Loan volume
Avg loan
Default rate
0.0%
vs <3% typical · system-wide
5-yr default

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17

Risk & Legal

53
Risk · 0-100
STRONG53 / 100

Early-stage, unproven franchise system with minimal unit count, undocumented financial claims, and unclear growth prospects presents elevated risk despite positive going concern status.

Score breakdown · what drove the 53 / 100 rating

  1. 01MINOROnly 3 units in system with unknown growth trajectory indicates extremely early-stage franchise with unproven scalability
  2. 02MEDNo Item 19 (Financial Performance Representations) disclosed — cannot independently verify the $768,058 avg revenue and $218,368 net income claims
  3. 03MINORHigh initial investment ($366,950–$502,600) relative to only 3 comparable locations creates difficulty validating ROI assumptions
  4. 04MINORRoyalty structure (6% of gross sales) combined with unknown unit economics means franchisees cannot validate true profitability claims
  5. 05MINORMicro-franchise size (3 units) suggests franchisor may lack operational maturity, proven systems, and financial stability to support franchisees

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Territory
Radius
Protected territory
Yes
Initial term
10 years
Renewal term
5 years
Online sales rights
Restricted
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Hire a manager?
Allowed
Litigation count
0
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can buy back on resale
Mandatory arbitration
Yes
Jury trial waiver
Yes
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction
Owner-operator
Optional
Governing law
California

Item 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
25 hrs
On-the-job training
26 hrs
POS system
Approved business management and POS system
Operating tech stack

Item 20

Franchisee Contacts

Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.

Franchisee contacts

14 numbers

Locked
(480) 219-••••
The franchisor is Recovery Lab Franchising LLC, located at
AZ
(415) 972-••••
CA
(402) 417-••••
NE

One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included

FDD download

Recovery Lab · FDD (2026) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above