Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Real Property Management logo

Real Property Management Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Real EstateTexasFranchising since 2005
BAbove averageAbove average66/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$99K – $244K
Disclosed sales
partial, no system average
SBA charge-off
10.3%
on 98 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02108FDD 2026Data QualityStandard76%
Owner-operator requiredNo: No territory protection

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Real Property Management is a property-management franchise handling leasing, rent collection, maintenance, and tenant relations for residential and commercial owners. Franchisees run a local office managing portfolios of rental properties and vendor coordination.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Real Property Management franchise requires a total initial investment of $99K – $244K, including a $70K franchise fee and an ongoing 7.0% royalty[2]. The 2026 FDD on file does not yield a unit-revenue figure we can publish. SBA 7(a) loans show a 10.3% charge-off rate across 98 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored4 of 5 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$99K – $244K
66th pct Real Estate
Avg gross sales
N/A
Projection
Royalty
7.0%
48th pct Real Estate
Units
450
78th pct Real Estate
SBA charge-off
10.3%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Real Estate · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$99K – $244K
Median $133K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$70K – $70K
Median $30K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$3K – $100K
Median $22K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
Partial, no system average
No system average in Item 19
Royalty Rate
7.0%
Median 6.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
9.0% of rev
Median 7.5%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
10.3%
98 loans · Median 15.7%
below median ↓, better than category
System Size
450 units
Median 70 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
6.2%
Median 7.5%
below median ↓, better than category
Territory
None
The franchisor can open or license outlets nearby
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
5 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Real Estate median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $99K – $244K including a $70K franchise fee, 7.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSItem 19 discloses Average/Median ANNUAL REVENUE PER PROPERTY UNIT MANAGED (not whole-outlet revenue): overall 421 reporting franchises, average $4,552/unit, median $4,256/unit, range $405.99-$19,257.03; broken out further by outlet age (1-3 years old vs. over 3 years old). Average number of property units managed per franchise (systemwide) = 260 (avg) / 123 (median). Average/median monthly rent charged per unit also disclosed: avg $1,541, median $1,496.
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 66/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 10.3% across 98 loans (above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +3 franchised outlets in the latest year (39 opened, 2 closed) (Item 20).
  • FLAGBankruptcy history disclosed in the FDD. Review Item 4 for details before proceeding.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Real Property Management SPV LLC
Parent company
Neighborly Assetco LLC
FDD Item 1, page 11 of the 2026 FDD
Ultimate parent
Nest Holdings LP (controlled by investment funds affiliated with Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. / KKR)
FDD Item 1, page 11 of the 2026 FDD
Predecessor
Property Management Business Solutions, LLC
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer (for Neighborly and Manager)
Michael Anthony Davis
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
1010 North University Parks Drive, Waco, Texas 76707
Auditor
Ernst & Young LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$383.2M
vs $451.9M prior year

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 11

17 other brands on this site name Nest Holdings LP (controlled by investment funds affiliated with Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. / KKR) as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Portfolio: KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) (private-equity sponsor) · Neighborly

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2026 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Michael Anthony Davis
Headquarters
Texas
Founded
2005
FDD year
2026
States available
51

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 29% above the typical real estate franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$99K – $244KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 37 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$69,900Verified — printed on page 25 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty7.0%Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 27 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$3K – $100K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2026 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Real Property Management: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$70K$70K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$3K$100K
Equipment, build-out, other$27K$74K
Total initial investment$99K$244K

Source: Real Property Management 2026 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$99K – $244K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$3K – $100K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$70K – $70K
Bottom third — review vs category
Royalty
7.0%
Set by a formula · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
9.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Real Property Management: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty7.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0%
Technology fee$121
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$3K
Total fee load9.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Avg gross salesNot extracted
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typeper unit metric
Sample size421

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

No Item 19 revenue figure for Real Property Management is on file. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Real Property Management unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $99K–$244K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $3K–$100K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$223K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Item 19 discloses Average/Median ANNUAL REVENUE PER PROPERTY UNIT MANAGED (not whole-outlet revenue): overall 421 reporting franchises, average $4,552/unit, median $4,256/unit, range $405.99-$19,257.03; broken out further by outlet age (1-3 years old vs. over 3 years old). Average number of property units managed per franchise (systemwide) = 260 (avg) / 123 (median). Average/median monthly rent charged per unit also disclosed: avg $1,541, median $1,496.

Reported per transaction, not per outlet

Item 19 type
per unit metric
Sample size
421
vs category median 53 · large
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank66th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank48th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank78th
vs Real Estate peers
Risk score rank22th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 101 Real Estate brands

Showing the headline figures — all 115 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 9.0% — above the Real Estate median of 7.5%.

Disclosure

Item 19 reports per unit metric rather than annual gross sales, so unit revenue is not directly comparable.

Operator retention

System expanding at 6.6% CAGR over 3 years across 450 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Real Estate medians

How Real Property Management Compares

Metric
Real Property Management
Category median
vs median
Investment
$172K
$133Kmiddle half $78K–$190K · n=89
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
N/A
$384Kmiddle half $254K–$616K · n=12
N/A
Unit Count
450
70middle half 27–191 · n=89
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Real Estate brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units450Verified — printed on page 78 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+6.6% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate6.2% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
450
Opened
39
Last reporting year
Closed
2
Turnover rate
6.2%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+6.6%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+6.6%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Transferred
13
2023
422
Franchised units
2024
447+25
Franchised units
2025
450+3
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 20 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 20 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

20 current owners across 18 states; 17 former (terminated, transferred or not renewed) listed separately.

  • NC 3
  • AL 1
  • AZ 1
  • CA 1
  • FL 1
  • GA 1
  • IA 1
  • MO 1
  • MT 1
  • NE 1
  • NY 1
  • OH 1
  • +6 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

B
SBA Lending Health
Strong SBA lending record · 10.3% charge-off
Total loans
98
Loan volume
$26.4M
Median loan
$150K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
10.3%
on 98 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
89.7%
5-yr charge-off
9.1%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
30
Defaults
3
Typical loan rate
8.0%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
21.5%
brand beats franchise avg ↓
Jobs supported
415
1.6 per loan
Lender concentration
48%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 82% went to startups / new businesses, 18% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in residential property managers, franchised businesses charge off at 21.5% vs 27.5% for independents — franchising is associated with 22% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

Real Property Management charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Real Property Management charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 5 vintages from 2015 to 2021. Rates range from 0.0% to 20.0%.0%5%10%15%20%'15'16'17'19'21

Top lenders financing Real Property Management franchisees

United Midwest Savings Bank National Association47 loans27.3%
The Huntington National Bank8 loans0.0%
Wells Fargo Bank National Association4 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 30 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
8
Loan volume
$2.6M
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
138

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Real Property Management from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
1.2%
Avg SBA guarantee
79%
Avg interest rate
7.95%
Avg chargeoff amount
$106K
Lender concentration
48.0%
Job velocity
1.6 per $100K
Startup risk premium
+21.4pp
NAICS benchmark
13.7%
NAICS 531311
Jobs supported
415

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 48% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1United Midwest Savings Bank National Association47$6.8M27.3%
2The Huntington National Bank8$687K0.0%
3Wells Fargo Bank National Association4$1.6M0.0%
4First Bank of the Lake4$1.3MN/A
5Readycap Lending, LLC4$772K0.0%
6Live Oak Banking Company3$1.3MN/A
7MI Bank3$1.6MN/A
8Celtic Bank Corporation2$2.1M0.0%
9Newtek Small Business Finance, Inc.2$400K0.0%
10Hinsdale Bank & Trust Company, National Association1$50K0.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
CACalifornia15116.7%
TXTexas1400.0%
FLFlorida900.0%
GAGeorgia6133.3%
INIndiana600.0%
WAWashington500.0%
MAMassachusetts40--
MIMichigan40--
MOMissouri400.0%
VAVirginia400.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2015
3
2016
6
2017
5
2018
1
2019
7
2020
7
2021
15
2022
13
2023
20
2024
8
2025
11
2026
2

Borrower profile

Startup63 (75%)
Existing (2+ yr)10 (12%)
New (< 2 yr)6 (7%)
Ownership change5 (6%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 10.3% — 35% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off10.3% · 98 loans
Verdict score66/100 (higher is better)
Litigation5 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average66Verdict score 66/100

Financially strong (KKR-backed): positive equity $2.95B, $480.8M revenue, $154M net income, audited, Item 19 disclosed. 4 litigation matters (non-compete disputes, some pending 2025) are routine relative to 450 units. Bankruptcies listed are unrelated KKR portfolio companies, not the franchisor. One minor concern from active non-compete litigation.

High confidence±4 pts
6270

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

Two pending/recent franchisee disputes (Solano Properties - pending; Rego - settled for $175,000 paid to Franchisor) allege Franchisor's post-termination restrictive covenants violate California UCL, met with Franchisor counterclaims for breach of contract. Three older, resolved cases (Gitlin 2016-2017, Garcia 2014-2018, Bechard 2014-2017) involved Predecessor, mostly tenant/franchisee disputes settled for modest amounts ($13,000-$75,000) or franchise buybacks.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

Subject: the company or an affiliate. Disclosed (Item 4 covers the last 10 years)

No bankruptcy involving the Franchisor itself; disclosed bankruptcies are of KKR portfolio companies (Marelli Holdings, The Collected Group, Envision Healthcare, Genesis Care, IPI Legacy Liquidation, Cafe Coffee Day) unrelated to Franchisor operations.

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Ernst & Young LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $383.2MYr 2: $451.9M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 66 / 100 verdict

  1. 01HIGH4 litigation matters (non-compete disputes) vs 450 units — routine
  2. 02MINORBankruptcies are unrelated KKR portfolio cos, not franchisor
  3. 03MINORVery strong financials: $2.95B equity, $154M net income
  4. 04MINOR15.7% net unit growth

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 115 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 9.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryNone (caution)
Initial training298 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeNo territory protection
Protected territoryNo
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population100,000
Online sales rightsRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ25 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ2
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Arbitration locationMcLennan County, Texas (mediation/arbitration/litigation venue; arbitration only if a court invalidates jury/class-action waiver)
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawTexas
Litigation count5
View Item 3 litigation summary

Two pending/recent franchisee disputes (Solano Properties - pending; Rego - settled for $175,000 paid to Franchisor) allege Franchisor's post-termination restrictive covenants violate California UCL, met with Franchisor counterclaims for breach of contract. Three older, resolved cases (Gitlin 2016-2017, Garcia 2014-2018, Bechard 2014-2017) involved Predecessor, mostly tenant/franchisee disputes settled for modest amounts ($13,000-$75,000) or franchise buybacks.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
42 hrs
On-the-job training
256 hrs
Training location
Waco or Dallas, Texas, or virtual/webinar training
Field support
256 hrs/yr
On-site visits per year
Franchisor financing
Offered
Item 10
POS system
AppFolio (Property Management Software); LeadSimple (Task/Lead Management)
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: AppFolio (Property Management Software); LeadSimple (Task/Lead Management)

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

37 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 37 contacts · $49
Free preview
(414) 400-••••WI
Unlock all 37 contacts
(614) 747-••••OH
(541) 550-••••OR
(215) 499-••••PA
(434) 422-••••VA

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Real Property Management franchise?

The total investment to open a Real Property Management franchise ranges from $99K – $244K, with an initial franchise fee of $70K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Real Property Management franchise owners earn?

Item 19 of the Real Property Management FDD discloses figures for part of the system but no single average across all outlets. These are gross sales figures, not profit; the Revenue section shows what the filing reports and on what basis. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns Real Property Management?

Real Property Management is franchised by Real Property Management SPV LLC. Its parent company is Neighborly Assetco LLC. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is Nest Holdings LP (controlled by investment funds affiliated with Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. / KKR). Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Real Property Management FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Real Property Management FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Real Property Management's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Real Property Management has a charge-off rate of 10.3% across 98 loans, meaning 10.3% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Real Property Management franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Real Property Management has 450 total units in the United States, including 450 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 39 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Real Property Management a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Real Property Management as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 66 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Real Property Management, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Real Estate franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Real Estate category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.