Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
REAL PRODUCERS logo

Real Producers Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Real EstateTXFranchising since 2017
AStrongest tierStrongest tier74/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$2K – $12K
Disclosed sales
partial, no system average
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02107FDD 2025Data QualityStandard76%
Manager-run OKNo: No territory protection

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Real Producers is a franchise publishing local magazines that spotlight top real-estate agents and connect them with preferred vendors. Franchisees run a local edition selling sponsorships, producing content, and building the agent community, typically home-based.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A REAL PRODUCERS franchise requires a total initial investment of $2K – $12K, including a $735 franchise fee. The 2025 FDD on file does not yield a unit-revenue figure we can publish. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored3 of 3 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$2K – $12K
0th pct Real Estate
Avg gross sales
N/A
Royalty
Not extracted
Units
153
62nd pct Real Estate
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Real Estate · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$2K – $12K
Median $133K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$735 – $735
Median $30K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$600 – $1K
Median $22K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
Partial, no system average
No system average in Item 19
Royalty Rate
Not extracted
Median 6.0%
Ongoing Fees
20.0% of rev
Median 7.5%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
153 units
Median 70 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
22.9%
Median 7.5%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
None
The franchisor can open or license outlets nearby
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
2 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Real Estate median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $2K – $12K including a $735 franchise fee.
  • RETURNSItem 19 discloses average YEARLY Commission payments (franchisee earnings), not whole-unit gross sales. Cohort: 114 Reporting Publications and 72 Reporting Franchisees for the Reporting Period July 1, 2024–June 30, 2025. No single overall average of all 114 publications is stated; only top-10% (11 highest, avg $346,525, median $302,302) and bottom-10% (11 lowest, avg $34,814, median $35,997) deciles are disclosed. Yearly range across both deciles: high $684,330, low $20,859. A separate net PROFIT representation is given only as a percentage of Cash Received (top-10% avg 78.4%, bottom-10% avg 32.6%), not in dollars, so no average profit figure is shown. Figures are commission/earnings income per publication, not retail revenue, so neither an average gross sales nor an average profit figure is shown, and these are not whole-outlet sales.
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 74/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +19 franchised outlets in the latest year (54 opened, 35 closed) (Item 20).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 27.5% CAGR over 3 years with 153 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
N2 Franchising, Inc.
Predecessor
N2 Franchising, LLC
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer and President
JP Hamel
CEO experience
2025 yrs
Years in role or industry
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
9151 Currency Street, Irving, Texas 75063
Auditor
A&G LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$77.8M
vs $77.5M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Overview

About

CEO
JP Hamel
Headquarters
TX
Founded
2016
FDD year
2025
States available
46

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 95% below the typical real estate franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$2K – $12KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 32 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$735Verified — printed on page 14 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
RoyaltyNot extracted
Ad fundNot extracted
Working capital$600 – $1K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown10 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Feenot refundable$735$735
Office Furniture & Equipmentnot refundable$0$3K
Computer Hardware & Softwarenot refundable$0$3K
Office Supplies and Stationerynot refundable$90$125
Insurance Coverage (1 year)not refundable$400$650
Initial Training Expensesnot refundable$0$1K
Attorney and Professional Feesnot refundable$0$2K
Government Licenses and Permitsnot refundable$0$500
Entity Formationnot refundable$100$500
Additional Funds (for first 3 months of operation)not refundable$600$1K
Total initial investment$2K$12K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$2K – $12K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$600 – $1K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$735 – $735
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
Royalty equals 20% of the advertising value of each issue…
Ad fund
No advertising fund; franchisee is not required to partic…
Total fee load
20.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

REAL PRODUCERS: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Technology fee$0
Transfer fee$735
Total fee load20.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Avg gross salesNot extracted
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typeAverage Yearly Commission …
Sample sizeNot extracted

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

No Item 19 revenue figure for REAL PRODUCERS is on file. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one REAL PRODUCERS unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundnot set
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $2K–$12K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $600–$1K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, royalty rate, ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$8K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Item 19 discloses average YEARLY Commission payments (franchisee earnings), not whole-unit gross sales. Cohort: 114 Reporting Publications and 72 Reporting Franchisees for the Reporting Period July 1, 2024–June 30, 2025. No single overall average of all 114 publications is stated; only top-10% (11 highest, avg $346,525, median $302,302) and bottom-10% (11 lowest, avg $34,814, median $35,997) deciles are disclosed. Yearly range across both deciles: high $684,330, low $20,859. A separate net PROFIT representation is given only as a percentage of Cash Received (top-10% avg 78.4%, bottom-10% avg 32.6%), not in dollars, so no average profit figure is shown. Figures are commission/earnings income per publication, not retail revenue, so neither an average gross sales nor an average profit figure is shown, and these are not whole-outlet sales.

Showing the headline figures — all 116 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 20.0% — above the Real Estate median of 7.5%.

Disclosure

Item 19 reports Average Yearly Commission Payments rather than annual gross sales, so unit revenue is not directly comparable.

Operator retention

System expanding at 27.5% CAGR over 3 years across 153 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Multi-unit rate

Only 25% of franchisees own multiple units. Could indicate challenging economics or a young system where operators haven't had time to expand.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Real Estate medians

How Real Producers Compares

Metric
Real Producers
Category median
vs median
Investment
$7K
$133Kmiddle half $78K–$190K · n=89
Below median, better than category
Revenue
N/A
$384Kmiddle half $254K–$616K · n=12
N/A
Unit Count
153
70middle half 27–191 · n=89
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Real Estate brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units153Verified — printed on page 60 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+27.5% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate22.9% (caution)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
153
Opened
54
Last reporting year
Closed
35
Terminated
1
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
22.9%
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
99%
vs corporate-owned
Multi-unit owners
25.0%
Net growth (3-yr)
+27.5%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+27.5%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
1
Not renewed
0
Transferred
9
Reacquired
2
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
0
0.00 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
25
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
5.9%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Continuity rate
81.3%
Units that stayed open
Termination rate
0.7%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
20.9%
Units that stopped operating
2022
132
Franchised units
2023
133+1
Franchised units
2024
152+19
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 44 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 44 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

142 current owners across 44 states.

  • CA 15
  • FL 12
  • TX 11
  • NJ 6
  • GA 5
  • MI 5
  • SC 5
  • CO 4
  • IN 4
  • NC 4
  • NH 4
  • NY 4
  • +32 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 50 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score74/100 (higher is better)
Litigation2 cases · none name the franchisor
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier74Verdict score 74/100

Two state administrative consent orders (CA DFPI 2020, WA DFI 2019) against an affiliate for selling franchises before registration, both resolved. No bankruptcy, no going-concern, audited financials, Item 19 disclosed. 153 units with strong 27.5% net growth; single minor regulatory concern.

Low confidence±15 pts
5989

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

Two administrative actions disclosed involving affiliate Neighborhood Networks Publishing, Inc. (now The N2 Company): (1) California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (Order I.D. 337865) - alleged violations of California Franchise Investment Law for offering/selling franchises without required disclosure documents prior to 2016 registration. Settled October 2020 via Consent Order requiring cease and desist and $10,000 reimbursement for investigative costs. (2) Washington Department of Financial Institutions Securities Division (Order No. S-18-2456-18-CO01) - alleged violations of Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act for offering/selling franchises without disclosure documents and making unauthorized financial performance representations. Settled April 2019 via Consent Order requiring compliance, cease and desist, and $4,000 reimbursement for investigative costs. Neither party agreed with findings but settled to resolve matters.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · A&G LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $77.8MYr 2: $77.5M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: No
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 74 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINOR2 resolved state registration consent orders (affiliate)
  2. 02MINORNo bankruptcy/going-concern; audited + Item 19
  3. 03MINORStrong 27.5% net unit growth on 153 units

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 116 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 20.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term3 yrs
Renewal termNot extracted
TerritoryNone (caution)
Initial training13 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term3 years
Allowed renewalsℹ0
Territory typeNo territory protection
Protected territoryNo
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory sizeℹnon_exclusive
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ10 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationIrving, Texas
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawTexas
Litigation count2
View Item 3 litigation summary

Two administrative actions disclosed involving affiliate Neighborhood Networks Publishing, Inc. (now The N2 Company): (1) California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (Order I.D. 337865) - alleged violations of California Franchise Investment Law for offering/selling franchises without required disclosure documents prior to 2016 registration. Settled October 2020 via Consent Order requiring cease and desist and $10,000 reimbursement for investigative costs. (2) Washington Department of Financial Institutions Securities Division (Order No. S-18-2456-18-CO01) - alleged violations of Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act for offering/selling franchises without disclosure documents and making unauthorized financial performance representations. Settled April 2019 via Consent Order requiring compliance, cease and desist, and $4,000 reimbursement for investigative costs. Neither party agreed with findings but settled to resolve matters.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
13 hrs
On-the-job training
0 hrs
Training location
At franchisor's location and on-site at restaurant
Ongoing training
Required
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Publisher Hero CRM
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: Publisher Hero CRM

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

192 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 192 contacts · $49
Free preview
704-658-••••NC
Unlock all 192 contacts
503-953-••••OR
319-575-••••IA
305-609-••••CA
603-493-••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a REAL PRODUCERS franchise?

The total investment to open a REAL PRODUCERS franchise ranges from $2K – $12K, with an initial franchise fee of $735. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do REAL PRODUCERS franchise owners earn?

Item 19 of the REAL PRODUCERS FDD discloses figures for part of the system but no single average across all outlets. These are gross sales figures, not profit; the Revenue section shows what the filing reports and on what basis. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns REAL PRODUCERS?

REAL PRODUCERS is franchised by N2 Franchising, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the REAL PRODUCERS FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the REAL PRODUCERS FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is REAL PRODUCERS's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for REAL PRODUCERS (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many REAL PRODUCERS franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, REAL PRODUCERS has 153 total units in the United States, including 152 franchised units and 1 company-owned units. 54 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is REAL PRODUCERS a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates REAL PRODUCERS as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 74 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent REAL PRODUCERS, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Real Estate franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Real Estate category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.