Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Mint Condition logo

Mint Condition Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Cleaning & MaintenanceSCFranchising since 2004
BAbove averageAbove average60/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$118K – $719K
Disclosed sales
$1.7M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-01643FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent86%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Mint Condition is a commercial cleaning franchise providing janitorial services to offices and facilities. Franchisees run the operations, building recurring cleaning contracts and managing crews and accounts.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Mint Condition franchise requires a total initial investment of $118K – $719K, including a $84K – $642K franchise fee and an ongoing 4.0% royalty[2]. This franchisor states the initial franchise fee as a rule rather than as one amount, so the figure shown is a single point from it and not what every franchisee pays. Item 5 states it as: This Initial Master Franchise Fee varies with a minimum of $84,000 or $84 per 1,000 of population in your Territory, whichever is greater. This fee is for a master or area-representative grant rather than a single unit, so it is not comparable with the single-unit fees shown for other brands. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $1.7M[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$118K – $719K
46th pct Cleaning & Ma…
Avg gross sales
$1.7M
Incl. company outlets28th pct Cleaning & Ma…
Royalty
4.0%
3rd pct Cleaning & Ma…
Units
15
24th pct Cleaning & Ma…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Cleaning & Maintenance · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$118K – $719K
Median $169K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$84K – $642K
Median $47K
Formula fee
Master/area fee
Liquid Capital Req'd
$5K – $30K
Median $30K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
$1.7M
Median $538K
above median ↑, better than category
Incl. company outlets
Royalty Rate
4.0%
Median 7.0%
below median ↓, better than category
Ongoing Fees
4.8% of rev
Median 8.3%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
15 units
Median 51 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 3.4%
below median ↓, better than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
5 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Cleaning & Maintenance median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $118K – $719K including a $84K franchise fee, 4.0% ongoing royalty. This franchisor states the initial franchise fee as a rule rather than as one amount, so the figure shown is a single point from it and not what every franchisee pays. Item 5 states it as: This Initial Master Franchise Fee varies with a minimum of $84,000 or $84 per 1,000 of population in your Territory, whichever is greater. This fee is for a master or area-representative grant rather than a single unit, so it is not comparable with the single-unit fees shown for other brands.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $1.7M/year (median $1.7M) (includes company-owned outlets). Note: this is gross profit, not take-home income.
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 60/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +4 franchised outlets in the latest year (4 opened, 0 closed) (Item 20).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Mint Condition Franchise Group, LLC
Parent company
Mint Condition Holdings, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
Mint Condition Franchising, Inc. (later Mint Condition of Charlotte, Inc.)
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
President and Chairman of the Board
John F. (Jack) Saumby
CEO experience
37 yrs
Years in role or industry
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
SC
HQ
1057 Red Ventures Drive, Suite 165, Fort Mill, South Carolina 29707
Auditor
BGW CPA, PLLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$1.6M
vs $933K prior year

Affiliated brands

  • that has been specifically formed to operate a Unit Franchise and perform services for customers in your Territory
  • Mint Condition Properties

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
John F. (Jack) Saumby
Headquarters
SC
FDD year
2025
States available
10

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 147% above the typical cleaning & maintenance franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$118K – $719KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 17 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$84,000Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 12 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Royalty4.0%Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Ad fund0.8%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 13 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$5K – $30K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

The filing states this fee as a rule

This franchisor states the initial franchise fee as a rule rather than as one amount, so the figure shown is a single point from it and not what every franchisee pays. Item 5 states it as: This Initial Master Franchise Fee varies with a minimum of $84,000 or $84 per 1,000 of population in your Territory, whichever is greater.

The filing conditions this fee

This fee is for a master or area-representative grant rather than a single unit, so it is not comparable with the single-unit fees shown for other brands.

Full Item 7 breakdown17 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Master Franchise Fee$84K$642K
Initial Office Supplies$700$1K
Initial Franchise Supplies$500$650
Initial Rent and Deposit$1K$2K
Office Furniture and Equipment$1K$3K
Printing$1K$2K
Permits, Licenses, and Fees$600$2K
Insurance Deposits$1K$2K
Legal Fees$2K$5K
Travel for Initial Training$4K$5K
Computer Software$2K$6K
Computer Hardware$3K$4K
Telephone System$200$450
Technology Fee$840$1K
Marketing for Individual Franchised Businesses (1st 3 Months)$4K$7K
Marketing for New Commercial Accounts (1st 3 Months)$5K$8K
Additional Funds - 3 months$5K$30K
Total initial investment$118K$719K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$118K – $719K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$5K – $30K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$84K – $642K
Master/area fee
Royalty
4.0%
Set by a formula · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
0.8%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
4.8%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Mint Condition: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty4.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund0.8% of gross sales
Technology fee$840
Transfer fee$10K
Inventory (initial)$1K – $2K
Total fee load4.8% of rev
Fee structure insight

A 4.8% total fee load is unusually lean. More of each revenue dollar stays with the franchisee.

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 221% above the cleaning & maintenance norm.

Avg gross sales$1.7M

Includes company-owned outlets

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 40 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$1.7MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 40 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross billings
Sample size11 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Mint Condition until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$436K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Mint Condition unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,724,409 per unit — Includes company-owned outlets. Adjust to a franchisee figure before relying on this.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $118K–$719K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $5K–$30K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$436K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Includes company-owned outlets

Avg gross sales
$1.7M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$1.7M

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross billings
Sample size
11 outlets
vs category median 32 · small
Range (low → high)
$266K→$4.7MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 40 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
7 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank28th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank46th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank3th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank24th
vs Cleaning & Maintenance peers
Risk score rank36th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 191 Cleaning & Maintenance brands

Showing the headline figures — all 136 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →
Revenue insight

Revenue is 4.1x the investment midpoint. At typical franchise margins, this suggests a payback under 3 years.

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $1.7M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 4.1x. Includes company-owned outlets.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 4.8% — below the Cleaning & Maintenance median of 8.3%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 7/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 40.0% CAGR over 3 years across 15 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Cleaning & Maintenance medians

How Mint Condition Compares

Metric
Mint Condition
Category median
vs median
Investment
$418K
$169Kmiddle half $115K–$269K · n=170
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$1.7M
$538Kmiddle half $349K–$1.1M · n=59
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
15
51middle half 12–108 · n=169
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Cleaning & Maintenance brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units15Verified — printed on page 42 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth+40.0% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
15
Opened
4
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
93%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+40.0%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+40.0%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
0
0.00 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
4
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Termination rate
6.7%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
2022
10
Franchised units
2023
10±0
Franchised units
2024
14+4
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 10 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 10 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Available to sell in · Item 12

  • Indiana
  • Michigan
  • Virginia

States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

16 current owners across 10 states.

  • NC 3
  • SC 3
  • FL 2
  • TX 2
  • AZ 1
  • GA 1
  • KS 1
  • PA 1
  • TN 1
  • UT 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

Growth insight

Fast growth in a small system. Newer franchisors expanding quickly may not yet have the support infrastructure of larger systems.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score60/100 (higher is better)
Litigation5 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average60Verdict score 60/100

Mint Condition exhibits caution-level risk due to litigation history, opaque royalty structure, aggressive growth trajectory, and missing financial validation despite solid unit-level revenues.

Moderate confidence±13 pts
4773

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

Five franchise-related cases: (1) Willis individual suit — jury verdict $11,443 to Willis, $3,105 to Mint Condition, both paid; (2) Harp — settled $5,000, dismissed Dec 2016; (3) Codio — settled $2,000, dismissed Nov 2016; (4) Richmond — settled $7,250, dismissed Dec 2016; (5) Ellis — settled $3,700, dismissed Dec 2016. All cases arose from franchisees alleging breach of contract, fraud, and unfair trade practices.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · BGW CPA, PLLC

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $1.6MYr 2: $0.9MNon-royalty: $0.1M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

FY2024 audited revenue: Master Franchise Royalty $847,492; Master Franchise Sales $629,356; Marketing Fees $148,314; Total Revenue $1,625,162. Audited by BGW CPA, PLLC (report dated Feb 28, 2025). FY2023 total revenues $933,256, FY2022 $891,889. S-corp; stockholder's equity is retained earnings.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 60 / 100 verdict

  1. 01HIGHMultiple active litigation disclosures alleging breach of contract, fraud, and unfair trade practices indicate systemic franchisor-franchisee relationship issues
  2. 02MEDHigh royalty structure (greater of 4% or minimum monthly fee) with undisclosed minimum threshold creates unpredictable cost burden
  3. 03MINORRapid 40% YoY unit growth (9 to 15 units) may indicate aggressive recruitment outpacing sustainable support infrastructure
  4. 04MINORZero franchise fee combined with litigation history suggests franchisor may prioritize unit growth over franchisee profitability

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 136 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 4.8% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training84 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Not allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ5 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ5
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawNC
Litigation count5
View Item 3 litigation summary

Five franchise-related cases: (1) Willis individual suit — jury verdict $11,443 to Willis, $3,105 to Mint Condition, both paid; (2) Harp — settled $5,000, dismissed Dec 2016; (3) Codio — settled $2,000, dismissed Nov 2016; (4) Richmond — settled $7,250, dismissed Dec 2016; (5) Ellis — settled $3,700, dismissed Dec 2016. All cases arose from franchisees alleging breach of contract, fraud, and unfair trade practices.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
65 hrs
On-the-job training
19 hrs
Training location
Corporate office, Fort Mill, SC
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
3 mo
From signing to launch
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
WinTeam
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✗Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: WinTeam

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

16 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 16 contacts · $49
Free preview
(919) 380-••••NC
Unlock all 16 contacts
(704) 552-••••NC
(864) 527-••••SC
(713) 909-••••TX
(803) 548-••••SC

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Mint Condition franchise?

The total investment to open a Mint Condition franchise ranges from $118K – $719K, with an initial franchise fee of $84K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD). This fee is for a master or area-representative grant rather than a single unit, so it is not comparable with the single-unit fees shown for other brands.

What do Mint Condition franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Mint Condition FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.7M. The median is $1.7M. Important context: Includes company-owned outlets. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Mint Condition?

Mint Condition is franchised by Mint Condition Franchise Group, LLC. Its parent company is Mint Condition Holdings, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Mint Condition FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Mint Condition FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Mint Condition's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Mint Condition (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Mint Condition franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Mint Condition has 15 total units in the United States, including 14 franchised units and 1 company-owned units. 4 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Mint Condition a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Mint Condition as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 60 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Mint Condition, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Cleaning & Maintenance franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Cleaning & Maintenance category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.