IMPACT-X Performance
Formerly known as Journey 333
Bottom line
- Total investment $213K – $446K including a $50K franchise fee.
- Average unit revenue of $364K/year (median $359K).
- Rated MODERATE with a risk score of 55/100. SBA loan default rate of 0.0% across 7 loans (below the industry average).
- Auditor disclosed a going-concern note — flagged doubt about the franchisor's ability to continue operations. Verify against the latest FDD.
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Yale framework · single-unit ROIC
Returns Analysis
Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.
The model · Yale framework
What would one IMPACT-X Performance unit return on the cash you put in?
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
29%
Below typical band (30–60%)
Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing
What would 25 IMPACT-X Performance units return on equity?
Equity IRR · 5-yr
49.9%
7.57× MOIC
Year-1 DSCR
1.88×
EBITDA ÷ debt service
Equity required
$1.6M
on $8.0M purchase
Total debt
$6.4M
SBA $4.0M + senior + seller note
Overview
About
IMPACT-X Performance franchisees operate fitness/athletic performance training facilities focused on personalized coaching, performance testing, and wellness programming. Day-to-day activities include leading 1-on-1 and small group training sessions, managing member scheduling and retention, overseeing facility operations, and driving local marketing to acquire new clients.
Item 7 · what it costs
The Vitals
Item 19
Financial Performance
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 4 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17
Risk & Legal
Early-stage system with undisclosed profitability, high capital requirement relative to revenue, and minimal financial transparency creates material uncertainty around franchisee ROI and break-even timeline.
Score breakdown · what drove the 55 / 100 rating
- 01MEDNet Income not disclosed in FDD Item 19 — unable to assess actual profitability or ROI
- 02MEDHigh initial investment ($213K–$446K) relative to disclosed average revenue ($364K) creates thin margin for error
- 03MINORRoyalty structure with $1,000/month minimum means breakeven point unclear; franchisees earning <$218K annually pay fixed rate regardless of sales
- 04MEDOnly 7 units system-wide indicates early-stage franchise with limited proven replicability and higher operational risk
- 05MINORModest 20% YoY growth rate is healthy but insufficient to demonstrate franchise model durability in competitive market
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
Item 11
Training & Operations
Item 20
Franchisee Contacts
Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.
Franchisee contacts
6 numbers
One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included
FDD download
IMPACT-X Performance · FDD (2025) PDF