Flip Flop Shops Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026
- Investment
- $183K – $349K
- Disclosed sales
- $473K
- gross sales, not profit
- SBA charge-off
- 52.6%
- on 26 loans
Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records
Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology
Flip Flop Shops is a retail franchise specializing in sandals, flip-flops, and casual footwear from popular brands. Franchisees run the stores, managing inventory, merchandising, and customer service in malls and resort areas.
FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026
A Flip Flop Shops franchise requires a total initial investment of $183K – $349K, including a $30K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $473K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 52.6% charge-off rate across 26 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: F (Weakest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →
Sources, dates and evidence
FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file
Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.
Overview
- Investment
- $183K – $349K
- 21st pct Retail
- Avg gross sales
- $473K
- Outlet subset3rd pct Retail
- Royalty
- 5.0%
- 6th pct Retail
- Units
- 47
- 19th pct Retail
- SBA charge-off
- 52.6%
- % of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category
Quick verdict · Retail · color = vs category peers
Green = favorable by >10% vs Retail median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)
Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology
Bottom line
- COSTTotal investment $183K – $349K including a $30K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
- RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $473K/year (median $333K) (reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system).
- RISKVerdict F (Weakest tier), verdict score 18/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 52.6% across 26 loans (well above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
- GROWTHNegative: net -2 franchised outlets in the latest year (10 opened, 12 closed); 9 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
- DECLINESystem contracting at -16.1% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven (consolidation) or franchisee-driven (economics).
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Corporate structure & franchisor financials
- Legal entity
- Flip Flop Shops, LLC
- Parent company
- Bearpaw Holdings, LLC
- FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2025 FDD
- Predecessor
- Flip Flop Shops Franchise Company
- Prior franchisor entity
- CEO title
- Managing Member & CEO
- Thomas A. Romeo
- Incorporated in
- CA
- HQ
- 7524 Old Auburn Road, Citrus Heights, California 95610
- Auditor
- Fineman West & Company
- Audited financials
- Franchisor revenue
- $826K
- vs $1.5M prior year
Overview
About
- CEO
- Thomas A. Romeo
- Headquarters
- CA
- Founded
- 2018
- FDD year
- 2025
- States available
- 12
Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?
Entry cost runs 21% below the typical retail franchise.
Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7
FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing
Initial investment breakdown
| Cost component | Low | High |
|---|---|---|
| Initial franchise fee | $30K | $30K |
| Working capital (3–6 mo) | $0 | $55K |
| Equipment, build-out, other | $153K | $264K |
| Total initial investment | $183K | $349K |
Source: Flip Flop Shops 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.
Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate
The Vitals
- Total investment
- $183K – $349K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Liquid capital req'd
- $0 – $55K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Franchise fee
- $30K – $30K
- Top 40% of category vs category
- Royalty
- 5.0%
- typical 6–8%
- Ad fund
- 1.0%
- typical 3–5%
- Total fee load
- 6.0%
- vs 9–13% typical
Ongoing fees · Item 6
| Fee | Amount |
|---|---|
| Royalty | 5.0% of gross sales |
| Marketing / ad fund | 1.0% of gross sales |
| Training fee | $2K |
| Transfer fee | $15K |
| Renewal fee | $15K |
| Inventory (initial) | $80K – $120K |
| Total fee load | 6.0% of rev |
A 6.0% total fee load is unusually lean. More of each revenue dollar stays with the franchisee.
What do units actually make?
Average unit sales run 41% below the retail norm.
Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system
Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19
Single-unit · not modelled
Returns at a glance
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Flip Flop Shops until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.
—
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
Total invested capital · disclosed
$293K
Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.
ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
What one unit earns on your invested capital
Model A · Single-Unit Return
Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.
Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.
Returns model · single-unit ROIC
What would one Flip Flop Shops unit return on the cash you put in?
Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.
—
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
What 25 units return when you use SBA financing
Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition
Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).
This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.
What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.
These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.
Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD
Financial Performance
Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system
- Avg gross sales
- $473K
- Per unit, per year
- Median gross sales
- $333K
Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.
- Item 19 type
- gross sales
- Sample size
- 36 outlets
- vs category median 46
- Range (low → high)
- $91K→$1.4MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 41 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
- Cohort dispersion (min → max)
- Reporting year
- 2024
- Fiscal year the figures cover
- Source filing
- FDD 2025
- Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
- Transparency
- 4 / 10
- vs category median 3 / 10 · above
Compared against 278 Retail brands
Operator outlook
What the numbers say
Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.
Unit economics
Average unit generates $473K/year in gross sales. Median is $333K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.8x. Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system.
Fee burden
Total ongoing fee load of 6.0% — below the Retail median of 8.0%.
Disclosure
Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.
Operator retention
System contracting at -16.1% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.
Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.
vs Retail medians
How Flip Flop Shops Compares
Category median of published Retail brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.
Is the system healthy?
Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20
Unit growth
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
- Total units
- 47
- Opened
- 10
- Last reporting year
- Closed
- 12
- Terminated
- 0
- Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
- Non-renewed
- 0
- Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
- Turnover rate
- 25.5%
- Company-owned
- 0
- Corporate units in the system
- % franchised
- 100%
- vs corporate-owned
- Net growth (3-yr)
- -16.1%
- Net unit change over 3 years
- 3-yr CAGR
- -16.1%
- Compounded over last 3 years
Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers
- Terminated
- 0
- Not renewed
- 0
- Transferred
- 3
- Reacquired
- 0
- Franchisor bought back
- Signed, not yet open
- 9
- 0.19 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
- Projected new
- 4
- Franchisor's next-year forecast
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 19 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.
Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list
60 current owners across 19 states.
- FL 19
- CA 13
- CO 5
- TX 4
- CT 2
- IA 2
- NC 2
- NY 2
- AZ 1
- GA 1
- HI 1
- IN 1
- +7 more states
Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.
SBA loan performance
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
- Total loans
- 26
- Loan volume
- $3.9M
- Median loan
- $172K
- 50th percentile
- Charge-off rate
- 52.6%
- on 26 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology
Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated
- Repayment rate (PIF)
- 47.4%
- 5-yr charge-off
- 66.7%
- Loans approved 2021+
- Active lenders
- 19
- Defaults
- 10
- Typical loan rate
- 6.9%
- avg rate to borrowers
- Franchised industry avg
- 27.1%
- brand above franchise avg ↑
- Jobs supported
- 117
- 3.3 per loan
- Lender concentration
- 17%
- top lender's share
Borrower mix: 100% went to startups / new businesses, 0% to established operators
Franchise vs independent — in shoe stores, franchised businesses charge off at 27.1% vs 24.2% for independents — franchising is associated with 12% higher SBA default risk in this category.
Top lenders financing Flip Flop Shops franchisees
Showing 3 of 19 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.
Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.
Lender network · 7(a) + 504
SBA Lending Report
Full lending analysis for Flip Flop Shops from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.
- Principal loss rate
- 33.9%
- Avg SBA guarantee
- 73%
- Avg interest rate
- 6.90%
- Avg chargeoff amount
- $122K
- Lender concentration
- 16.7%
- Job velocity
- 3.3 per $100K
- NAICS benchmark
- 29.4%
- NAICS 448210
- Jobs supported
- 117
Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 17% of loans
| # | Lender | Loans | Volume | Default % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Huntington National Bank | 4 | $445K | N/A |
| 2 | Wells Fargo Bank National Association | 3 | $578K | 100.0% |
| 3 | ChoiceOne Bank | 2 | $182K | 0.0% |
| 4 | Bank of Hawaii | 2 | $80K | 50.0% |
| 5 | Centennial Bank | 1 | $182K | 0.0% |
| 6 | Columbia Bank | 1 | $30K | 0.0% |
| 7 | Gulf Coast Bank and Trust Company | 1 | $146K | 0.0% |
| 8 | Santa Cruz Community Credit Union | 1 | $212K | 0.0% |
| 9 | Locality Bank | 1 | $165K | 0.0% |
| 10 | Zions Bank, A Division of | 1 | $120K | 100.0% |
Geographic failure vector
| State | Loans | Defaults | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLFlorida | 6 | 1 | 50.0% |
| CACalifornia | 4 | 2 | 50.0% |
| TXTexas | 3 | 3 | 100.0% |
| HIHawaii | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| MIMichigan | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| AZArizona | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| COColorado | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
| LALouisiana | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| MOMissouri | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| NJNew Jersey | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
SBA 7(a) lending trend
Borrower profile
Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict
A 52.6% charge-off rate means roughly 1 in 2 franchisees failed to repay their SBA loan. Investigate what changed.
What could kill this investment?
SBA loans charge off at 52.6% — 228% above the 16.0% national norm, i.e. higher lender-observed risk.
Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21
Risk analysis
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21
Risk & Legal
Litigation (Item 3)
Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).
1) DFPI consent order (CA government action) - FFS failed to properly disclose predecessor litigation in FDDs 2018-2022, sold 10 CA franchises while unregistered; paid $52,500 penalty, closed. 2) Vupico USA Inc. v. Flip Flop Shops Franchise Company (predecessor) - franchisee sued for fraudulent inducement; judgment against predecessor $429,581. 3) Deckers Outdoor Corp v. Romeo & Juliette, Inc. and Thomas Romeo - patent infringement; jury verdict $5,250,838; settled on appeal.
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None disclosed
Audited financials (Item 21)
Yes · Fineman West & Company
Franchisor revenue (Item 21)
Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)
Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16
- Franchisor sells you products: No
- Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
- Must buy proprietary products: No
- Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
- Can negotiate own supplier terms: No
Score breakdown · what drove the 18 / 100 verdict
- 01MINORUnit count declining 4.1% year-over-year (47 units) suggests system contraction and potential viability concerns
- 02HIGHMultiple litigation matters including fraud allegations against predecessor, California DFPI consent order for registration violations, and patent infringement suit against CEO create legal/reputational risk
- 03MEDNet income not disclosed despite $473K average revenue — inability or unwillingness to report profitability is a major transparency red flag
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
What are you signing up for?
Ongoing fees run about 6.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.
Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17
FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
| Initial term | 8 years |
|---|---|
| Renewal term | 5 years |
| Allowed renewalsℹ | 2 |
| Territory type | Protected territory |
| Protected territory | Yes |
| Exclusive territoryℹ | No |
| Territory radius | 1 mi |
| Online sales rightsℹ | Restricted |
| Franchisor can compete | Yes |
| Hire a manager? | Allowed |
| Owner-operator | Required |
| Non-compete (years)ℹ | 2 years |
| Non-compete (miles)ℹ | 15 mi |
| Right of first refusalℹ | Yes |
| RoFR response window | 30 days |
| Transfer requires consent | Yes |
| Termination notice | 30 days |
| Curable defaultsℹ | 5 |
| Mandatory arbitration | No |
| Arbitration location | Sacramento, California |
| Jury trial waiver | Yes |
| Governing law | CA |
| Litigation count | 3 |
View Item 3 litigation summary
1) DFPI consent order (CA government action) - FFS failed to properly disclose predecessor litigation in FDDs 2018-2022, sold 10 CA franchises while unregistered; paid $52,500 penalty, closed. 2) Vupico USA Inc. v. Flip Flop Shops Franchise Company (predecessor) - franchisee sued for fraudulent inducement; judgment against predecessor $429,581. 3) Deckers Outdoor Corp v. Romeo & Juliette, Inc. and Thomas Romeo - patent infringement; jury verdict $5,250,838; settled on appeal.
Items 10, 11
Training & Operations
- Classroom training
- 0 hrs
- On-the-job training
- 84 hrs
- Training location
- On-site at franchised location
- Ongoing training
- Required
- Time to open
- 9 mo
- From signing to launch
- Site selection
- Franchisee with franchisor approval
- Franchisor financing
- Not offered
- Item 10
- POS system
- RICS
- Operating tech stack
Items 5 & 11
Franchisor Support
Technology: RICS
Item 20 · call current owners
Franchisee Contacts
60 owners to call
Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20
Frequently asked questions
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does it cost to open a Flip Flop Shops franchise?
The total investment to open a Flip Flop Shops franchise ranges from $183K – $349K, with an initial franchise fee of $30K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).
What do Flip Flop Shops franchise owners earn?
According to Item 19 of the Flip Flop Shops FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $473K. The median is $333K. Important context: Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.
Who owns Flip Flop Shops?
Flip Flop Shops is franchised by Flip Flop Shops, LLC. Its parent company is Bearpaw Holdings, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.
What is Item 19 in the Flip Flop Shops FDD?
The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Flip Flop Shops FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.
What is Flip Flop Shops's franchise failure rate?
Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Flip Flop Shops has a charge-off rate of 52.6% across 26 loans, meaning 52.6% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.
How many Flip Flop Shops franchise locations are there?
As of their most recent FDD filing, Flip Flop Shops has 47 total units in the United States, including 47 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 10 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.
Is Flip Flop Shops a good franchise to buy?
FranchiseVerdict rates Flip Flop Shops as a F-grade franchise with a verdict score of 18 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.
Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.
For franchisors
Are you the franchisor?
If you represent Flip Flop Shops, you can request corrections or provide updated information.
Other Retail franchises
Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Retail category
Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.