Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Complete Mobile Drug Testing logo

Complete Mobile Drug Testing Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

HealthcareWIFranchising since 2025
CAverageAverage43/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$68K – $288K
Disclosed sales
$889K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00609FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent91%
Manager-run OKYes: Exclusive territory

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Complete Mobile Drug Testing is a healthcare services franchise providing mobile drug testing, DNA testing, and background checks. Franchisees run mobile operations, managing testing, collections, and accounts.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Complete Mobile Drug Testing franchise requires a total initial investment of $68K – $288K, including a $55K – $215K franchise fee and an ongoing 10.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $889K[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: C (Average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Limited operating history: franchising since 2025. A system this young has fewer than three years of Item 20 outlet history and rarely enough SBA loans for a charge-off rate, so its grade rests on less evidence than an established system's. Read its Item 20 tables and talk to its first franchisees before relying on the grade. Other new franchisors

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$68K – $288K
8th pct Healthcare
Avg gross sales
$889K
Company-owned only1 outlet
Royalty
10.0%
68th pct Healthcare
Units
1
1st pct Healthcare
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Healthcare · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$68K – $288K
Median $321K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$55K – $215K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$5K – $8K
Median $40K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
$889K
Median $676K
above median ↑, better than category
Company-owned only1 outlet
Royalty Rate
10.0%
Median 7.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
12.0% of rev
Median 8.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
1 units
Median 23 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 0.0%
Territory
Exclusive
No other outlet of the brand may open inside it
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Healthcare median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $68K – $288K including a $55K franchise fee, 10.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $889K/year (median $889K) (company-owned outlets only - not franchisee performance). Estimated payback in 0.5 years.
  • RISKVerdict C (Average), verdict score 43/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHFlat: no net change in franchised outlets in the latest year (0 opened, 0 closed) (Item 20).
  • FLAGRevenue data based on only 1 outlet. Treat as directional, not definitive. Ask franchisees directly for current unit economics.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Complete Mobile Drug Testing Franchise LLC
Predecessor
None
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Founder and Chief Executive Officer
Milka Krecak
Incorporated in
Wisconsin
HQ
4805 S. 74th St., Suite B, Greenfield, WI 53220

Affiliated brands

  • Complete Mobile Drug Testing

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
Milka Krecak
Headquarters
WI
Founded
2011
FDD year
2026
States available
1

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 45% below the typical healthcare franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$68K – $288KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 17 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$54,500Verified — printed on page 11 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty10.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 11 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund0.0%Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Working capital$5K – $8K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown15 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$55K$215K
Rent and Deposit$0$6K
Utilities$0$3K
Leasehold Improvements$0$5K
Market Introduction Program$3K$5K
Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment$0$27K
Computer Systems$3K$5K
Insurance (3 months)$800$2K
Vehicle$0$4K
Signage$0$500
Office Expenses$1K$3K
Inventory$700$3K
Licenses and Permits$150$250
Travel, lodging and meals for initial training$700$3K
Additional funds (for first 3 months)$5K$8K
Total initial investment$68K$288K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$68K – $288K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$5K – $8K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$55K – $215K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
10.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
0.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
12.0%
vs 9–13% typical
Payback period
0.5 yrs
From FDD / Item 19

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Complete Mobile Drug Testing: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty10.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund0.0%
Technology fee$250
Training fee$500
Transfer fee$15K
Renewal fee$5K
Inventory (initial)$700 – $3K
Total fee load12.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 32% above the healthcare norm.

Avg gross sales$889K

Company-owned outlets only - not franchisee performance

Based on a single outlet - not a system average

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 38 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$889KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 38 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typehistoric
Sample size1 outlet

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Complete Mobile Drug Testing until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$184K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

FDD-reported earnings

The FDD reports $394K as Net Profit. This is a disclosed figure, not our estimate — we publish no modelled profit for Complete Mobile Drug Testing.

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Complete Mobile Drug Testing unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $889,003 per unit — Company-owned outlets only - not franchisee performance. Adjust to a franchisee figure before relying on this.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $68K–$288K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $5K–$8K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$184K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Company-owned outlets only - not franchisee performance

Based on a single outlet - not a system average

Avg gross sales
$889K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$889K
Avg net profit
$394K
Reported as Net Profit in FDD Item 19

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
historic
Sample size
1 outlet
vs category median 20 · small
Reported figure
$889KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 38 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
A single outlet — not a range
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
9 / 10
vs category median 3 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank8th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank68th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank1th
vs Healthcare peers
Risk score rank68th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 162 Healthcare brands

Showing the headline figures — all 133 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →
Revenue insight

Revenue is 5.0x the investment midpoint. At typical franchise margins, this suggests a payback under 3 years.

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $889K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 5.0x. Company-owned outlets only - not franchisee performance.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 12.0% — above the Healthcare median of 8.0%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 9/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence. Sample size of 1 outlet — treat as directional only.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Healthcare medians

How Complete Mobile Drug Testing Compares

Metric
Complete Mobile Drug Testing
Category median
vs median
Investment
$178K
$321Kmiddle half $178K–$530K · n=133
Below median, better than category
Revenue
$889K
$676Kmiddle half $496K–$929K · n=48
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
1
23middle half 5–101 · n=132
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Healthcare brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units1Verified — printed on page 39 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
1
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
0%
vs corporate-owned

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
2023
0
Franchised units
2024
0±0
Franchised units
2025
0±0
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 1 state reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

1

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score43/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

CAverage43Verdict score 43/100
Moderate confidence±13 pts
3056

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation is required to be disclosed in this Item.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: No
  • Restricted to system-approved products: No
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 43 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINOROnly 1 unit in system with unknown growth trajectory indicates either brand-new or stagnant franchise
  2. 02MINOR10% royalty on adjusted gross sales creates ambiguity on what deductions apply before royalty calculation
  3. 03MINORProtected territory claim unverified with only one franchisee — unclear how franchisor enforces or defines territory boundaries

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 133 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 12.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryExclusive (favorable vs category)
Initial training36 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeExclusive territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹYes
Territory population250,000
Online sales rightsRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ5 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ1
Curable defaultsℹ2
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationGreenfield, Wisconsin
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawWisconsin
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation is required to be disclosed in this Item.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
15 hrs
On-the-job training
21 hrs
Training location
Greenfield, Wisconsin
Ongoing training
Optional
Time to open
4 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
franchisee
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Electronic Merchant Systems
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✗Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: Electronic Merchant Systems

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

1 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 1 contacts · $49
Free preview
262-982-••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Complete Mobile Drug Testing franchise?

The total investment to open a Complete Mobile Drug Testing franchise ranges from $68K – $288K, with an initial franchise fee of $55K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Complete Mobile Drug Testing franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Complete Mobile Drug Testing FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $889K. The median is $889K. Important context: Company-owned outlets only - not franchisee performance; Based on a single outlet - not a system average. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Complete Mobile Drug Testing?

Complete Mobile Drug Testing is franchised by Complete Mobile Drug Testing Franchise LLC. The FDD names no parent company. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Complete Mobile Drug Testing FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Complete Mobile Drug Testing FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Complete Mobile Drug Testing's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Complete Mobile Drug Testing (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Complete Mobile Drug Testing franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Complete Mobile Drug Testing has 1 total units in the United States.

Is Complete Mobile Drug Testing a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Complete Mobile Drug Testing as a C-grade franchise with a verdict score of 43 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Complete Mobile Drug Testing, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Healthcare franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Healthcare category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.