FranchiseVerdict
Complete Mobile Drug Testing logo
FV-00609·MODERATEExcellent86

Complete Mobile Drug Testing

OtherFranchising since 2025Website
Investment
$72K – $123K
21st pct Other
Avg revenue
$962K
30th pct Other
Royalty
10.0%
59th pct Other
Units
1
7th pct Other
SBA default
0.0%
vs <3% typical

Bottom line

  • Total investment $72K – $123K including a $50K franchise fee, 10.0% ongoing royalty.
  • Average unit revenue of $962K/year. Estimated payback in 0.2 years.
  • Rated MODERATE with a risk score of 60/100. SBA loan default rate of 0.0% across 2 loans (below the industry average).
  • Emerging franchise — only 1 year of franchising with 1 units. Early-stage systems carry higher risk but may offer better territory availability.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Legal entity
Complete Mobile Drug Testing Franchise LLC
Incorporated in
Wisconsin
HQ
4805 S. 74th St., Suite B, Greenfield, WI 53220

Yale framework · single-unit ROIC

Returns Analysis

Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.

The model · Yale framework

What would one Complete Mobile Drug Testing unit return on the cash you put in?

Revenue · per unit, per year
$
FDD Item 19 reports $961,725
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fund
Royaltytyp 68%
%
Ad fundtyp 35%
%
Operating costs · category default: generic
COGS
%
Labor
%
Rent / occupancy
%
Other operating
%
Total invested capital · what you actually put in
Initial investment
$
FDD Item 7: $72K–$123K
Working capital
$
FDD reports $5K–$8K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

102%

Above typical band (30–60%)

0%30–60% Yale band80%
ROIC above 100% usually means the revenue figure is a system-wide aggregate or top-cohort number rather than a single-unit average. Verify the "Revenue · per unit" field against the brand's FDD Item 19 detail tables before relying on this output.

Store EBITDA · annual
$106K
EBITDA margin
11.0%
Total invested
$104K
Payback
12 mo
Unit-level only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even Yale describes.

Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing

What would 25 Complete Mobile Drug Testing units return on equity?

Edit assumptions

Equity IRR · 5-yr

49.9%

7.57× MOIC

Year-1 DSCR

1.88×

EBITDA ÷ debt service

Equity required

$769K

on $3.8M purchase

Total debt

$3.1M

SBA $1.9M + senior + seller note

Overview

About

Franchisees operate mobile drug testing services, conducting on-site employee drug screenings and compliance testing for corporate clients. Daily operations involve scheduling tests, traveling to client locations, collecting samples, and managing client relationships while handling regulatory compliance documentation. Revenue is generated through per-test fees and recurring corporate contracts.

CEO
Milka Krecak
Founded
2025
FDD year
2025
States available
1

Item 7 · what it costs

The Vitals

Total investment
$72K – $123K
All-in to open one unit
Liquid capital
$5K – $8K
Cash you must have on hand
Franchise fee
$50K
Royalty
10.0%
Percentage of Adjusted Gross Sales · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
12.0%
vs 9–13% typical
Payback period
0.2 yrs
From v3 / Item 19

Item 19

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$962K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
Item 19 type
Affiliate
Sample size
1 units
vs category median 20 · small
Transparency
9 / 5
vs category median 3 / 5 · above
Revenue rank30th
vs Other peers
Investment cost rank21th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank59th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank7th
vs Other peers
Risk score rank41th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
1
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Turnover rate
0.0%
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
0%
vs corporate-owned
2023
0±0
Franchised units
2024
0
Franchised units
2025
0
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 14 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Registered · 14 states
Not registered

States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
2
Loan volume
Avg loan
Default rate
0.0%
vs <3% typical · system-wide
5-yr default

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17

Risk & Legal

60
Risk · 0-100
MODERATE60 / 100

Single-unit franchise with going concern issues, unverified financial claims, and unclear growth trajectory presents significant execution and support risk despite reasonable unit economics.

Score breakdown · what drove the 60 / 100 rating

  1. 01MINOROnly 1 unit in system with unknown growth trajectory indicates either brand-new or stagnant franchise
  2. 02HIGHGoing Concern flag is FALSE — suggests potential financial instability or undisclosed operational issues
  3. 03MINORNo Item 19 financial performance representations — cannot independently verify claimed $961,725 avg revenue or $408,660 net income
  4. 04MINOR10% royalty on adjusted gross sales creates ambiguity on what deductions apply before royalty calculation
  5. 05MINORHigh investment range ($72k-$123k) relative to single-unit system provides no economies of scale or support infrastructure proof
  6. 06MINORProtected territory claim unverified with only one franchisee — unclear how franchisor enforces or defines territory boundaries

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Territory
Population
Protected territory
Yes
Initial term
10 years
Renewal term
5 years
Online sales rights
Restricted
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Hire a manager?
Allowed
Litigation count
0
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can buy back on resale
Mandatory arbitration
Yes
Jury trial waiver
Yes
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction
Owner-operator
Required
Governing law
Wisconsin

Item 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
14 hrs
On-the-job training
12 hrs
POS system
Electronic Merchant Systems
Operating tech stack

Item 20

Franchisee Contacts

Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.

Franchisee contacts

15 numbers

Locked
(262) 982-••••
WI
(360) 902-••••
WA
(401) 462-••••
RI

One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included