Bottom line
- Total investment $110K – $320K including a $100K franchise fee.
- No Item 19 financial performance data disclosed — the franchisor chose not to publish revenue figures.
- Rated CAUTION with a risk score of 77/100. SBA loan default rate of 0.0% across 234 loans (below the industry average).
- 10 litigation matters disclosed in Item 3 — higher than typical. Review the summary for patterns (franchisor-initiated vs. franchisee-initiated).
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Yale framework · single-unit ROIC
Returns Analysis
Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.
The model · Yale framework
What would one Whole Property Management unit return on the cash you put in?
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
48%
In Yale's "attractive" band (30–60%)
Overview
About
Whole Property Management appears to be a property management franchise where franchisees likely oversee residential and/or commercial properties, collect rent, handle tenant relations, maintenance coordination, and accounting for property owners. However, with zero disclosed units and missing operational data, the actual business model and day-to-day responsibilities remain unclear.
Item 7 · what it costs
The Vitals
Item 19
Financial Performance
This franchisor did not disclose financial performance representations in Item 19, or our extractor could not parse them.
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 3 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17
Risk & Legal
This franchise presents extreme risk due to going concern status, pending fraud litigation against leadership, zero operating units, missing financial disclosures, and regulatory enforcement history.
Score breakdown · what drove the 77 / 100 rating
- 01HIGHGoing concern warning indicates fundamental viability questions about the franchisor
- 02HIGHSignificant litigation against CEO and parent company involving fraud and breach of fiduciary duty allegations creates governance and trust concerns
- 03MEDZero disclosed franchise units with unknown growth trajectory suggests either brand collapse or complete lack of track record
- 04MEDMissing critical financial disclosures (average revenue, net income, royalty rate) prevents informed ROI analysis
- 05MINORHigh franchise fee ($100,000) combined with investment range up to $320,400 represents substantial capital at risk with no performance benchmarks
- 06MINORConsent order from California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation indicates prior regulatory violation
- 07MINORNo Item 19 financial performance representation limits ability to validate earnings claims
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
Item 11
Training & Operations
Item 20
Franchisee Contacts
Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.
Franchisee contacts
6 numbers
One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included
FDD download
Whole Property Management · FDD (2026) PDF