Bottom line
- Total investment $89K – $342K including a $70K franchise fee, 40.0% ongoing royalty.
- No Item 19 financial performance data disclosed — the franchisor chose not to publish revenue figures.
- Rated MODERATE with a risk score of 65/100.
- No Item 19 financial performance representation. Without franchisor-disclosed revenue data, you'll need to gather unit economics directly from existing franchisees.
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Yale framework · single-unit ROIC
Returns Analysis
Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.
The model · Yale framework
What would one Send Me a Pro unit return on the cash you put in?
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
-60%
Negative
Overview
About
Send Me a Pro appears to be a service-based franchise model (likely home services, handyman, or professional services network). Franchisees operate within a protected territory, generating revenue that triggers 40% royalty payments to the franchisor, though the specific service delivery model is not disclosed in available materials.
Item 7 · what it costs
The Vitals
Item 19
Financial Performance
This franchisor did not disclose financial performance representations in Item 19, or our extractor could not parse them.
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 13 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
No SBA loan data available for this brand.
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17
Risk & Legal
Small, opaque system with aggressive royalty structure, regulatory history, and zero financial transparency creates meaningful risk despite protected territory and no franchise fee.
Score breakdown · what drove the 65 / 100 rating
- 01MINORExtremely high royalty rate (40%) combined with $0 franchise fee suggests aggressive revenue extraction model with minimal upfront commitment from franchisor
- 02MEDOnly 8 units system-wide with no disclosed growth trajectory indicates either nascent/stalled expansion or significant franchisee attrition
- 03MINORNo Item 19 (Average Revenue/Net Income) disclosure prevents ROI validation and suggests franchisor may lack performance data to support claims
- 04MINOR2021 California regulatory violation (expired CPA credentials in registration filings) raises compliance and disclosure integrity concerns, despite modest $15K fine
- 05MINORExtreme investment range spread ($89K–$342K, 3.8x difference) indicates high variability in territory economics and unclear cost structure
- 06MED10-year term with protected territory creates long-term lock-in risk if unit economics prove unfavorable, with limited franchisor financial transparency
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
Item 11
Training & Operations
Item 20
Franchisee Contacts
Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.
Franchisee contacts
17 numbers
One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included
FDD download
Send Me a Pro · FDD (2025) PDF