V/O Med Spa
Formerly known as VIO Med Spa
Bottom line
- Total investment $930K – $1.2M including a $50K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
- Average unit revenue of $1.5M/year (median $1.2M).
- Rated STRONG with a risk score of 49/100. SBA loan default rate of 0.0% across 53 loans (below the industry average).
- System growing at 233.3% CAGR over 3 years with 35 total units — strong expansion trajectory.
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Yale framework · single-unit ROIC
Returns Analysis
Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.
The model · Yale framework
What would one V/O Med Spa unit return on the cash you put in?
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
27%
Below typical band (30–60%)
Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing
What would 25 V/O Med Spa units return on equity?
Equity IRR · 5-yr
28.1%
3.44× MOIC
Year-1 DSCR
2.90×
EBITDA ÷ debt service
Equity required
$11.0M
on $22.8M purchase
Total debt
$11.8M
SBA $5.0M + senior + seller note
Overview
About
V/O Med Spa franchisees operate medical aesthetic clinics offering treatments such as injectables, laser services, body contouring, and skincare procedures. Day-to-day operations involve managing licensed clinical staff, scheduling patient appointments, maintaining compliance with medical regulations, and driving sales through marketing and patient retention programs.
Item 7 · what it costs
The Vitals
Item 19
Financial Performance
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 15 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17
Risk & Legal
V/O Med Spa presents CAUTION-level risk: missing critical profitability data, corporate going concern issues, and unverified growth claims create material due diligence gaps before investing nearly $1M.
Score breakdown · what drove the 49 / 100 rating
- 01MEDNet income not disclosed in Item 19 — unable to validate actual profitability claims against $1.47M average revenue
- 02HIGHGoing Concern status is FALSE — indicates financial instability at corporate or franchisor level
- 03MEDHigh initial investment ($929K-$1.2M) with 6% royalty creates significant breakeven burden without disclosed unit economics
- 04MINOR100% YoY unit growth (35 units) appears inflated — need verification of organic vs. rebranded growth and unit churn rate
- 05MINORProtected territory provided but no disclosure of territory size, density caps, or multi-unit clause restrictions
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
Item 11
Training & Operations
Item 20
Franchisee Contacts
Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.
Franchisee contacts
42 numbers
One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included
FDD download
V/O Med Spa · FDD (2024) PDF