Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Restore Hyper Wellness logo

Restore Hyper Wellness Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

HealthcareTXFranchising since 2016
BAbove averageAbove average63/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$777K – $1.3M
Disclosed sales
$912K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Limited · 102 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02146FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent95%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Restore Hyper Wellness is a health-and-wellness franchise offering IV drips, cryotherapy, red-light therapy, and other recovery and biohacking services. Franchisees run studios on a membership and treatment model managing staff and services.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Restore Hyper Wellness franchise requires a total initial investment of $777K – $1.3M, including a $45K franchise fee and an ongoing 7.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $912K[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$777K – $1.3M
78th pct Healthcare
Avg gross sales
$912K
20th pct Healthcare
Royalty
7.0%
37th pct Healthcare
Units
221
71st pct Healthcare
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Healthcare · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$777K – $1.3M
Median $321K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$45K – $45K
Median $50K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$75K – $100K
Median $40K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$912K
Median $676K
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
7.0%
Median 7.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
9.0% of rev
Median 8.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Limited · 102 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 102 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units
System Size
221 units
Median 23 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
13.1%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
3 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Healthcare median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $777K – $1.3M including a $45K franchise fee, 7.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $912K/year (median $851K).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 63/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -5 franchised outlets in the latest year (24 opened, 29 closed); 26 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 25.1% CAGR over 3 years with 221 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Restore Franchising, LLC
Parent company
Austin Cryo Ventures, LLC (ACV)
FDD Item 1, page 10 of the 2025 FDD
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Matthew Vonderahe
Incorporated in
TX
HQ
3601 South Congress Ave., Suite C-200, Austin, TX 78704
Auditor
Citrin Cooperman & Company, LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$25.4M
vs $24.0M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Overview

About

CEO
Matthew Vonderahe
Headquarters
TX
Founded
2016
FDD year
2025
States available
38

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 227% above the typical healthcare franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$777K – $1.3MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 33 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$44,500Verified — printed on page 21 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty7.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 23 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 24 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$75K – $100K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown21 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Fee$45K$45K
Architect Fees$15K$30K
Permitting Fees$3K$10K
Leasehold Improvements$325K$600K
Equipment$169K$270K
Frontage Sign$7K$15K
Furnishings & Fixtures$13K$30K
Travel Costs for Launch Training (3-4 people)$5K$6K
Grand Opening Marketing Expenses$25K$25K
Three Months' Rent$9K$44K
Security Deposit$3K$16K
Materials and General Supplies$11K$15K
Technology System$6K$16K
Medical Supplies$10K$13K
Esthetician Supplies$10K$11K
Shipping & Handling Costs$8K$15K
Equipment Installation Costs$22K$32K
Professional Fees$5K$10K
Commercial Surety Bond$500$2K
Insurance Cost$13K$19K
Total initial investment$777K$1.3M

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$777K – $1.3M
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$75K – $100K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$45K – $45K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
7.0%
Set by a formula · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
9.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Restore Hyper Wellness: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty7.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$600
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$7K
Total fee load9.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 35% above the healthcare norm.

Avg gross sales$912KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 81 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$851KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 81 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typehistorical average Gross S…
Sample size198 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Restore Hyper Wellness until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$1.1M

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Restore Hyper Wellness unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $911,516 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $777K–$1.3M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $75K–$100K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$1.1M
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$912K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$851K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
historical average Gross Sales and Active Memberships for franchised Studios open 12+ months as of 12/31/2024
Sample size
198 outlets
vs category median 20 · large
Range (low → high)
$136K→$2.5MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 81 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
$554K→$1.4M
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 3 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank20th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank78th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank37th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank71th
vs Healthcare peers
Risk score rank21th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 162 Healthcare brands

Showing the headline figures — all 150 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →
Revenue insight

Revenue is only 0.9x the investment. This means each unit may take 5+ years to recoup the initial outlay at typical margins.

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $912K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 0.9x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 9.0% (near the Healthcare median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 25.1% CAGR over 3 years across 221 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Multi-unit rate

Only 6% of franchisees own multiple units. Could indicate challenging economics or a young system where operators haven't had time to expand.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Healthcare medians

How Restore Hyper Wellness Compares

Metric
Restore Hyper Wellness
Category median
vs median
Investment
$1.1M
$321Kmiddle half $178K–$530K · n=133
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$912K
$676Kmiddle half $496K–$929K · n=48
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
221
23middle half 5–101 · n=132
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Healthcare brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units221Verified — printed on page 85 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth-2.3% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate13.1% (caution)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
221
Opened
24
Last reporting year
Closed
29
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
13.1%
Company-owned
12
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
95%
vs corporate-owned
Multi-unit owners
5.6%
Net growth (3-yr)
-2.3%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+25.1%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
4
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
26
0.12 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
7
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
1.8%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Continuity rate
87.8%
Units that stayed open
Ceased ops
13.1%
Units that stopped operating
2022
167
Franchised units
2023
214+47
Franchised units
2024
209-5
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 18 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 18 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

227 current owners across 27 states.

  • TE 37
  • NE 26
  • FL 24
  • CA 19
  • PE 13
  • CO 11
  • MI 10
  • OH 10
  • MA 8
  • SO 8
  • AR 7
  • GE 7
  • +15 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 15 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
102
Loan volume
$62.1M
Median loan
$547K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
Limited · 102 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 102 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Limited · 102 loans
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
33
Defaults
0
Typical loan rate
6.6%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
17.4%
n=2,725 loans
Jobs supported
1,101
2.1 per loan
Lender concentration
31%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 89% went to startups / new businesses, 11% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in other personal care services, franchised businesses charge off at 17.4% vs 20.9% for independents — franchising is associated with 17% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

Restore Hyper Wellness charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Restore Hyper Wellness charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 3 vintages from 2019 to 2021. Rates range from 0.0% to 0.0%.0%5%10%'19'20'21

Top lenders financing Restore Hyper Wellness franchisees

LendingClub Bank, National Association27 loans0.0%
Simmons Bank7 loans0.0%
Meridian Bank6 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 33 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Restore Hyper Wellness from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
0.0%
Avg SBA guarantee
76%
Avg interest rate
6.60%
Lender concentration
31.0%
Job velocity
2.1 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
5.1%
NAICS 812199
Jobs supported
1,101

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 31% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1LendingClub Bank, National Association27$20.8M0.0%
2Simmons Bank7$2.7M0.0%
3Meridian Bank6$3.1M0.0%
4The Huntington National Bank4$1.4M0.0%
5Peoples Bank4$1.6M0.0%
6Emprise Bank4$2.1MN/A
7The Union Bank Company3$902K0.0%
8Glacier Bank2$550K0.0%
9Coastal States Bank2$690K0.0%
10Village Bank and Trust, National Association2$858KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
TXTexas2300.0%
FLFlorida1000.0%
CACalifornia70--
TNTennessee60--
OHOhio500.0%
PAPennsylvania500.0%
MNMinnesota30--
MOMissouri300.0%
UTUtah300.0%
COColorado20--

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2018
3
2019
11
2020
13
2021
26
2022
19
2023
10
2024
1
2025
3
2026
1

Borrower profile

Startup72 (83%)
Existing (2+ yr)7 (8%)
New (< 2 yr)5 (6%)
Ownership change2 (2%)
Unanswered1 (1%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offLimited · 102 loans
Verdict score63/100 (higher is better)
Litigation3 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average63Verdict score 63/100

Large 221-unit wellness system with two pending franchisee suits alleging fraud/misrepresentation, one seeking $1.5M+ (currently stayed by plaintiffs' Chapter 7). Financials are strong: net worth $7.07M, revenue $25.4M, net income $2.96M, growth +25.1%.

High confidence±4 pts
5967

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

Two pending matters: (1) Butterfield et al. v. Restore Franchising LLC (3:23-cv-00820, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Tennessee) - breach of contract, fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation, negligent non-disclosure; damages sought $1,500,000+; litigation stayed due to plaintiffs' Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing on September 25, 2023. (2) Omran Solutions, LLC v. Restore Franchising, LLC (Case No. 01-24-005-5617, AAA arbitration) - violations of Texas and Colorado consumer protection laws and breach of contract regarding exclusive territory; franchisor has asserted counterclaims.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Citrin Cooperman & Company, LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $25.4MYr 2: $24.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 63 / 100 verdict

  1. 01HIGHTwo pending franchisee suits alleging fraud/negligent misrepresentation; one seeks $1.5M+
  2. 02MINORStrong financials: revenue $25.4M, net income $2.96M, net worth $7.07M
  3. 03MINORHealthy growth +25.1% on 221 units

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 150 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 9.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training145 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory sizeℹDesignated Area
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ5 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window30 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationTexas
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawTexas
Litigation count3
View Item 3 litigation summary

Two pending matters: (1) Butterfield et al. v. Restore Franchising LLC (3:23-cv-00820, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Tennessee) - breach of contract, fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation, negligent non-disclosure; damages sought $1,500,000+; litigation stayed due to plaintiffs' Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing on September 25, 2023. (2) Omran Solutions, LLC v. Restore Franchising, LLC (Case No. 01-24-005-5617, AAA arbitration) - violations of Texas and Colorado consumer protection laws and breach of contract regarding exclusive territory; franchisor has asserted counterclaims.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
81 hrs
On-the-job training
64 hrs
Training location
On-site and corporate
Ongoing training
Required
Site selection
franchisor approval of franchisee-identified site (franchisor provides site selection criteria/guidance; may use designated master broker)
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Proprietary POS System
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: Proprietary POS System

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

242 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 242 contacts · $49
Free preview
(443) 869-••••MA
Unlock all 242 contacts
(317) 324-••••IN
(404) 836-••••GE
(512) 344-••••TE
(470) 361-••••GE

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Restore Hyper Wellness franchise?

The total investment to open a Restore Hyper Wellness franchise ranges from $777K – $1.3M, with an initial franchise fee of $45K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Restore Hyper Wellness franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Restore Hyper Wellness FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $912K. The median is $851K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Restore Hyper Wellness?

Restore Hyper Wellness is franchised by Restore Franchising, LLC. Its parent company is Austin Cryo Ventures, LLC (ACV). Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Restore Hyper Wellness FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Restore Hyper Wellness FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Restore Hyper Wellness's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Restore Hyper Wellness (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Restore Hyper Wellness franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Restore Hyper Wellness has 221 total units in the United States, including 209 franchised units and 12 company-owned units. 24 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Restore Hyper Wellness a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Restore Hyper Wellness as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 63 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Restore Hyper Wellness, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Healthcare franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Healthcare category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.