Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf logo

The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsCAFranchising since 2019
BAbove averageAbove average49/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$941K – $1.4M
Disclosed sales
$791K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02615FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent95%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf is a specialty-coffee-and-tea franchise serving espresso drinks, its signature Ice Blended beverages, and teas. Franchisees run cafes managing baristas, beverage prep, and service.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf franchise requires a total initial investment of $941K – $1.4M, including a $13K – $25K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.5% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $791K[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$941K – $1.4M
92nd pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$791K
13th pct Service Resta…
Royalty
5.5%
44th pct Service Resta…
Units
179
82nd pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$941K – $1.4M
Median $486K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$13K – $25K
Median $35K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$60K – $75K
Median $33K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$791K
Median $975K
below median ↓, worse than category
Royalty Rate
5.5%
Median 5.5%
near median
Ongoing Fees
7.5% of rev
Median 7.5%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
179 units
Median 18 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
4.3%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
5 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $941K – $1.4M including a $25K franchise fee, 5.5% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $791K/year (median $767K).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 49/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHNegative: net -8 franchised outlets in the latest year (1 opened, 1 closed) (Item 20).
  • DECLINESystem contracting at -11.5% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven (consolidation) or franchisee-driven (economics).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Super Magnificent Coffee Company Ireland Limited
Parent company
Super Magnificent Coffee Company Pte Ltd. (Singapore)
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2025 FDD
Ultimate parent
Jollibee Foods Corporation
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
International Coffee & Tea, LLC
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Jose Miñana, Jr.
Incorporated in
Ireland
HQ
550 S. Hope St, Suite 2100, Los Angeles, CA 90071
Auditor
Wu Hoover & Co. LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$35.3M
vs $30.5M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 8

3 other brands on this site name Jollibee Foods Corporation as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2025 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Jose Miñana, Jr.
Headquarters
CA
Founded
2019
FDD year
2025
States available
9

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 144% above the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$941K – $1.4MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 28 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$25,000Verified — printed on page 16 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty5.5%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 20 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 21 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$60K – $75K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$25K$25K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$60K$75K
Equipment, build-out, other$856K$1.3M
Total initial investment$941K$1.4M

Source: The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$941K – $1.4M
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$60K – $75K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$13K – $25K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
5.5%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
7.5%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.5% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$2K
Training fee$450
Transfer fee$5K
Renewal fee$13K
Inventory (initial)$8K – $32K
Total fee load7.5% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 19% below the quick-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$791KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 76 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$767KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 76 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typehistorical average/median/…
Sample size13 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$1.3M

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $790,902 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $941K–$1.4M (midpoint used)
FDD reports $60K–$75K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$1.3M
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$791K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$767K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
historical average/median/high/low gross revenues by outlet segment
Sample size
13 outlets
vs category median 19
Range (low → high)
$473K→$1.3MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 76 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
6 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank13th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank92th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank44th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank82th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank52th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 162 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →
Revenue insight

Revenue is only 0.7x the investment. This means each unit may take 5+ years to recoup the initial outlay at typical margins.

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $791K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 0.7x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 7.5% (near the Quick-Service Restaurants median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 6/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System contracting at -11.5% CAGR over 3 years. Investigate whether closures are franchisor-driven consolidation or franchisee exits.

Multi-unit rate

Only 6% of franchisees own multiple units. Could indicate challenging economics or a young system where operators haven't had time to expand.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf Compares

Metric
The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf
Category median
vs median
Investment
$1.2M
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$791K
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
Below median, worse than category
Unit Count
179
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units179Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 77 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
3-yr growth-11.5% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate4.3% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
179
Opened
1
Last reporting year
Closed
1
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
4.3%
Company-owned
110
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
0%
vs corporate-owned
Multi-unit owners
6.2%
Net growth (3-yr)
-11.5%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
-11.5%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Projected new
2
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Ceased ops
2.3%
Units that stopped operating
2022
81
Franchised units
2023
77-4
Franchised units
2024
69-8
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 5 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 5 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

132 current owners across 5 states.

  • CA 113
  • NV 12
  • AZ 5
  • HI 1
  • LA 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

Growth insight

A system losing more than 10% of its units year-over-year is a red flag. Check whether closures are concentrated in specific regions.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score49/100 (higher is better)
Litigation5 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average49Verdict score 49/100

Financially strong: net worth $402.9M, net income $20.8M on $35.3M revenue, audited with Item 19. Only 4 routine litigation matters against a 130-unit system, which is normal. Sole concern is unit contraction with net growth of -11.5%.

Moderate confidence±13 pts
3662

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

Fisher v. International Coffee & Tea, LLC (pending class action, filed August 8, 2023) alleges deceptive trade practices regarding sustainability claims in K-Cup advertising. New Amsterdam Coffee & Tea Co., LLC et al. v. International Coffee & Tea, LLC (concluded arbitration) involved claims for misrepresentation, breach of contract, and unfair business practices related to area development agreements.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Wu Hoover & Co. LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $35.3MYr 2: $30.5M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 49 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORNet worth $402.9M, net income $20.8M — strong
  2. 02MINORNet growth -11.5% (contraction)
  3. 03MINORNo bankruptcy/going-concern

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 162 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 7.5% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training112 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius0.3 mi
Online sales rightsRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ10 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice10 days
Termination groundsℹ4
Curable defaultsℹ2
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationLos Angeles, California
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawCalifornia
Litigation count5
View Item 3 litigation summary

Fisher v. International Coffee & Tea, LLC (pending class action, filed August 8, 2023) alleges deceptive trade practices regarding sustainability claims in K-Cup advertising. New Amsterdam Coffee & Tea Co., LLC et al. v. International Coffee & Tea, LLC (concluded arbitration) involved claims for misrepresentation, breach of contract, and unfair business practices related to area development agreements.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
32 hrs
On-the-job training
80 hrs
Training location
On-site and off-site
Ongoing training
Required
Site selection
franchisee (subject to franchisor acceptance)
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

132 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 132 contacts · $49
Free preview
(562) 612-••••CA
Unlock all 132 contacts
(818) 523 ••••CA
(702) 261-••••NV
(808) 732 -••••HI
(702) 220-••••NV

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf franchise?

The total investment to open a The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf franchise ranges from $941K – $1.4M, with an initial franchise fee of $25K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $791K. The median is $767K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf?

The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf is franchised by Super Magnificent Coffee Company Ireland Limited. Its parent company is Super Magnificent Coffee Company Pte Ltd. (Singapore). The ultimate parent named in the FDD is Jollibee Foods Corporation. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf has 179 total units in the United States, including 69 franchised units and 110 company-owned units. 1 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 49 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.