FranchiseVerdict
Surveillance Secure logo
FV-02519·CAUTIONExcellent91FDD 2021

Surveillance Secure

OtherFranchising since 2019Website
Investment
$116K – $174K
40th pct Other
Avg revenue
$2.4M
44th pct Other
Royalty
6.0%
17th pct Other
Units
2
14th pct Other
SBA default
0.0%
vs <3% typical

Bottom line

  • Total investment $116K – $174K including a $55K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • Average unit revenue of $2.4M/year. Estimated payback in 0.2 years.
  • Rated CAUTION with a risk score of 71/100. SBA loan default rate of 0.0% across 8 loans (below the industry average).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Legal entity
Surveillance Secure Franchising LLC
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
4102 Harvard Place, Frederick, Maryland 21703
Auditor
Reese CPA LLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$0
vs $60K prior year

Yale framework · single-unit ROIC

Returns Analysis

Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.

The model · Yale framework

What would one Surveillance Secure unit return on the cash you put in?

Revenue · per unit, per year
$
FDD Item 19 reports $2,427,428
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fund
Royaltytyp 68%
%
Ad fundtyp 35%
%
Operating costs · category default: generic
COGS
%
Labor
%
Rent / occupancy
%
Other operating
%
Total invested capital · what you actually put in
Initial investment
$
FDD Item 7: $116K–$174K
Working capital
$
FDD reports $20K–$4K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

232%

Above typical band (30–60%)

0%30–60% Yale band80%
ROIC above 100% usually means the revenue figure is a system-wide aggregate or top-cohort number rather than a single-unit average. Verify the "Revenue · per unit" field against the brand's FDD Item 19 detail tables before relying on this output.

Store EBITDA · annual
$364K
EBITDA margin
15.0%
Total invested
$157K
Payback
5 mo
Unit-level only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even Yale describes.

Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing

What would 25 Surveillance Secure units return on equity?

Edit assumptions

Equity IRR · 5-yr

29.9%

3.70× MOIC

Year-1 DSCR

2.70×

EBITDA ÷ debt service

Equity required

$8.6M

on $19.4M purchase

Total debt

$10.8M

SBA $5.0M + senior + seller note

SBA 7(a) request ($9.7M) exceeds the $5M program cap. Excess capped automatically; backfill via conventional or equity.

Overview

About

Surveillance Secure franchisees likely design, install, and maintain commercial security camera systems and monitoring services for small-to-medium businesses. Day-to-day operations involve client consultations, equipment installation/service calls, system monitoring, and customer support for CCTV infrastructure.

CEO
Kim Hartman
Founded
2019
FDD year
2021
States available
2

Item 7 · what it costs

The Vitals

Total investment
$116K – $174K
All-in to open one unit
Liquid capital
$20K – $4K
Cash you must have on hand
Franchise fee
$55K
Royalty
6.0%
Gross Revenues · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
8.0%
vs 9–13% typical
Payback period
0.2 yrs
From v3 / Item 19

Item 19

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$2.4M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
Item 19 type
Affiliate Performance
Sample size
1 units
vs category median 20 · small
Transparency
9 / 5
vs category median 3 / 5 · above
Revenue rank44th
vs Other peers
Investment cost rank40th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank17th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank14th
vs Other peers
Risk score rank79th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
2
Opened
1
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Turnover rate
0.0%
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
50%
vs corporate-owned
2019
1+1
Franchised units
2020
0
Franchised units
2021
0
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 16 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Registered · 16 states
Not registered

States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
8
Loan volume
Avg loan
Default rate
0.0%
vs <3% typical · system-wide
5-yr default

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17

Risk & Legal

71
Risk · 0-100
CAUTION71 / 100

Extreme caution warranted: A 2-unit micro-franchise with unverified financial claims, going concern issues, and no Item 19 support represents speculative, high-risk investment with inadequate franchisor infrastructure.

Score breakdown · what drove the 71 / 100 rating

  1. 01MEDOnly 2 units in system with unknown growth trajectory indicates extremely limited track record and no proven scalability
  2. 02HIGHGoing Concern = False suggests potential financial instability or undisclosed operational challenges at franchisor level
  3. 03MEDNo Item 19 (Financial Performance Representations) disclosed — cannot validate the $622,400 average net income claim or $2.4M revenue figures
  4. 04MINORMassive gap between investment range ($116K-$173.7K) and claimed net income ($622K) creates unrealistic ROI expectations that warrant verification
  5. 05MINOR6% royalty on gross revenues (not net) compounds risk if franchisees cannot achieve projected $2.4M revenue baseline
  6. 06MINOR10-year term is unusually long for a 2-unit franchise with no demonstrated system stability or franchisee retention data

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Territory
Population-based (Zip codes)
Protected territory
Yes
Initial term
10 years
Renewal term
10 years
Online sales rights
Restricted
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Hire a manager?
Allowed
Litigation count
0
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can buy back on resale
Mandatory arbitration
Yes
Jury trial waiver
Yes
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction
Owner-operator
Required
Governing law
Maryland

Item 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
48 hrs
On-the-job training
52 hrs
POS system
ConnectWise
Operating tech stack

Item 20

Franchisee Contacts

Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.

Franchisee contacts

16 numbers

Locked
(651) 539-••••
MN
(213) 576-••••
CA
(212) 416-••••
NY

One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included

FDD download

Surveillance Secure · FDD (2021) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above