Bottom line
- Total investment $35K – $104K including a $20K franchise fee.
- Average unit revenue of $507K/year (median $317K).
- Rated MODERATE with a risk score of 60/100.
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Yale framework · single-unit ROIC
Returns Analysis
Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.
The model · Yale framework
What would one ServiceRX unit return on the cash you put in?
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
194%
Above typical band (30–60%)
Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing
What would 25 ServiceRX units return on equity?
Equity IRR · 5-yr
40.9%
5.55× MOIC
Year-1 DSCR
2.09×
EBITDA ÷ debt service
Equity required
$3.3M
on $11.9M purchase
Total debt
$8.6M
SBA $5.0M + senior + seller note
Overview
About
ServiceRX franchisees appear to operate a service-based business (likely pharmacy, healthcare, or pharmaceutical-related services) managing weekly gross revenues averaging $506k. Day-to-day operations likely involve client account management, service delivery/fulfillment, compliance documentation, and coordination with franchisor systems, while paying a minimum $125/week royalty floor.
Item 7 · what it costs
The Vitals
Item 19
Financial Performance
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 12 · 2 states reported
The Territory Map
FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.
2
states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
No SBA loan data available for this brand.
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17
Risk & Legal
Micro-system with opaque financial disclosures, questionable franchisor stability, and minimal operational track record creates elevated risk for franchisee profitability and franchisor support sustainability.
Score breakdown · what drove the 60 / 100 rating
- 01MINOROnly 3 units in system with unknown growth trajectory indicates minimal scale and unproven model expansion
- 02MEDNet income not disclosed in Item 19 prevents ROI validation; only gross revenue ($506k avg) provided without profitability context
- 03HIGHGoing Concern = False is highly unusual terminology and may indicate financial instability or accounting issues at franchisor level
- 04MINORDual royalty structure (6% OR $125/week minimum) means franchisees pay $6,500 minimum annually regardless of performance
- 05MEDExtremely limited franchisee base (3 units) makes due diligence validation difficult and suggests weak demand or recent launches
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
Item 11
Training & Operations
Item 20
Franchisee Contacts
Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.
Franchisee contacts
1 numbers
One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included
FDD download
ServiceRX · FDD (2026) PDF