FranchiseVerdict
SAUNA HOUSE logo
FV-02239·MODERATEExcellent86

Sauna House

Formerly known as Sweat Ventures

Health & Wellness - OtherFranchising since 2022Website
Investment
$1.6M – $3.8M
99th pct Other
Avg revenue
$1.4M
46th pct Other
Royalty
7.0%
43rd pct Other
Units
3
14th pct Other
SBA default
0.0%
vs <3% typical

Bottom line

  • Total investment $1.6M – $3.8M including a $50K franchise fee, 7.0% ongoing royalty.
  • Average unit revenue of $1.4M/year. Estimated payback in 9.2 years.
  • Rated MODERATE with a risk score of 65/100. SBA loan default rate of 0.0% across 6 loans (below the industry average).
  • Auditor disclosed a going-concern note — flagged doubt about the franchisor's ability to continue operations. Verify against the latest FDD.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Legal entity
Sweat Ventures, LLC
Parent company
Sauna Party, LLC
Incorporated in
North Carolina
HQ
2000 Riverside Drive, Ste. 27, Asheville, North Carolina 28804
Auditor
Kezos & Dunlavy
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$55K
vs $0 prior year
⚠ Going-concern note
Disclosed in FDD 2025
Auditor flagged doubt about continued operations. Verify against the latest FDD before deciding.

Yale framework · single-unit ROIC

Returns Analysis

Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.

The model · Yale framework

What would one SAUNA HOUSE unit return on the cash you put in?

Revenue · per unit, per year
$
FDD Item 19 reports $1,357,050
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fund
Royaltytyp 68%
%
Ad fundtyp 35%
%
Operating costs · category default: personal services
COGS
%
Labor
%
Rent / occupancy
%
Other operating
%
Total invested capital · what you actually put in
Initial investment
$
FDD Item 7: $1.6M–$3.8M
Working capital
$
FDD reports $113K–$243K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

10%

Below typical band (30–60%)

0%30–60% Yale band80%

Store EBITDA · annual
$285K
EBITDA margin
21.0%
Total invested
$2.9M
Payback
121 mo
Unit-level only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even Yale describes.

Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing

What would 25 SAUNA HOUSE units return on equity?

Edit assumptions

Equity IRR · 5-yr

30.2%

3.74× MOIC

Year-1 DSCR

2.67×

EBITDA ÷ debt service

Equity required

$8.3M

on $19.0M purchase

Total debt

$10.7M

SBA $5.0M + senior + seller note

SBA 7(a) request ($9.5M) exceeds the $5M program cap. Excess capped automatically; backfill via conventional or equity.

Overview

About

Sauna House franchisees operate upscale sauna wellness facilities offering infrared and traditional sauna experiences, often bundled with complementary services like massage, skincare, or fitness. Day-to-day operations involve membership management, facility maintenance, staff scheduling, marketing to drive recurring visits, and ensuring regulatory compliance for health/safety codes.

CEO
Andrew Lachlan Nehlig
Founded
2022
FDD year
2025
States available
2

Item 7 · what it costs

The Vitals

Total investment
$1.6M – $3.8M
All-in to open one unit
Liquid capital
$113K – $243K
Cash you must have on hand
Franchise fee
$50K
Royalty
7.0%
Gross Sales · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
9.0%
vs 9–13% typical
Payback period
9.2 yrs
From v3 / Item 19

Item 19

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$1.4M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
Item 19 type
Company-Owned
Sample size
1 units
vs category median 12 · small
Transparency
9 / 5
vs category median 4 / 5 · above
Revenue rank46th
vs Health & Wellness - Other peers
Investment cost rank99th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank43th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank14th
vs Health & Wellness - Other peers
Risk score rank71th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
3
Opened
1
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Turnover rate
0.0%
Company-owned
2
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
33%
vs corporate-owned
2023
1+1
Franchised units
2024
0
Franchised units
2025
0
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 14 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Registered · 14 states
Not registered

States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
6
Loan volume
Avg loan
Default rate
0.0%
vs <3% typical · system-wide
5-yr default

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17

Risk & Legal

65
Risk · 0-100
MODERATE65 / 100

Early-stage, unproven franchise with high capital requirements, thin unit count, unprotected territory, and unclear financial sustainability despite going concern status.

Score breakdown · what drove the 65 / 100 rating

  1. 01MINOROnly 3 units in system with unknown growth trajectory suggests minimal scale and unproven replicability
  2. 02MINORNo territory protection creates direct competition risk from other franchisees or corporate expansion
  3. 03MINORHigh capital requirement ($1.56M–$3.84M) with modest average net income ($293,745) yields 7–19% ROI — below market expectations for this investment tier
  4. 04MINORSignificant gap between gross revenue ($1,357,050) and net income ($293,745) indicates 78% cost structure, raising sustainability questions
  5. 05MINOR7% royalty on gross sales (not net) penalizes profitability and assumes consistent revenue without protection
  6. 06HIGHUndisclosed litigation status and lack of Item 19 financials in FDD limits due diligence confidence
  7. 07MINORExtremely small franchisee base (3 units) provides almost no performance validation or peer support network

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Protected territory
No
Initial term
10 years
Renewal term
5 years
Online sales rights
Restricted
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Hire a manager?
Allowed
Litigation count
0
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can buy back on resale
Mandatory arbitration
Yes
Jury trial waiver
Yes
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction
Owner-operator
Required
Governing law
North Carolina

Item 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
41 hrs
On-the-job training
20 hrs
POS system
Boulevard
Operating tech stack

Item 20

Franchisee Contacts

Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.

Franchisee contacts

14 numbers

Locked
(401) 462-••••
RI
(360) 902-••••
WA
(217) 782-••••
IL

One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included

FDD download

SAUNA HOUSE · FDD (2025) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above