Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Rolling Suds logo

Rolling Suds Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Formerly known as Suds Creative

Cleaning & MaintenanceTNFranchising since 2022
AStrongest tierStrongest tier70/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$186K – $252K
Disclosed sales
$419K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Limited · 26 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02174FDD 2025Data QualityStandard76%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Rolling Suds is a power washing franchise serving residential and commercial properties. Franchisees run truck-based crews, handling exterior surface cleaning, scheduling, and account development within a territory.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Rolling Suds franchise requires a total initial investment of $186K – $252K, including a $55K franchise fee and an ongoing 8.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $419K[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$186K – $252K
68th pct Cleaning & Ma…
Avg gross sales
$419K
11th pct Cleaning & Ma…
Royalty
8.0%
56th pct Cleaning & Ma…
Units
67
51st pct Cleaning & Ma…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Cleaning & Maintenance · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$186K – $252K
Median $169K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$55K – $55K
Median $47K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$59K – $75K
Median $30K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$419K
Median $538K
below median ↓, worse than category
Royalty Rate
8.0%
Median 7.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
10.0% of rev
Median 8.3%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Limited · 26 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 26 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units
System Size
67 units
Median 51 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 3.4%
below median ↓, better than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Cleaning & Maintenance median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $186K – $252K including a $55K franchise fee, 8.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $419K/year.
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 70/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHNegative, pipeline stalled: 177 agreements signed but not yet open against 67 open outlets (Item 20).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Rolling Suds Franchising LLC
Parent company
Rolling Suds Holdings, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 7 of the 2025 FDD
CEO title
CEO
Aaron Harper
Founder active
Yes
Original founder still leading the business
Incorporated in
Pennsylvania
HQ
3662C Central Pike, Hermitage, Tennessee 37076
Auditor
DA Advisory Group PLLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$2.7M
vs $6.1M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Overview

About

CEO
Aaron Harper
Headquarters
TN
Founded
2022
FDD year
2025
States available
26

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 29% above the typical cleaning & maintenance franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$186K – $252KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 18 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$54,900Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 17 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Royalty8.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 11 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 11 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$59K – $75K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown18 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Fee$55K$55K
Training Expenses$2K$3K
Down Payment On Service Vehicle$5K$32K
Down Payment on Sales Vehicle$0$4K
Brand Launch Package$30K$30K
Lease Deposit; First Months' Rent and Utilities$4K$8K
Leasehold Improvements$0$1K
Business Licenses and Permits$150$500
Technology Systems$100$1K
Shop Kit Inventory Package$6K$8K
Cleaning Solutions$1K$3K
Service Vehicle Payments (Three Months)$8K$9K
Sales Vehicle Payments (Three Months)$0$2K
Professional Fees$1K$3K
Local Advertising (3 Months)$8K$8K
Grand Opening Advertising (3 Months)$8K$8K
Insurance$1K$4K
Additional Funds (3 Months)$59K$75K
Total initial investment$186K$252K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$186K – $252K
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$59K – $75K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$55K – $55K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
8.0%
Set by a formula · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
10.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Rolling Suds: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty8.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$650
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$5K
Total fee load10.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 22% below the cleaning & maintenance norm.

Avg gross sales$419KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 48 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size5 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Rolling Suds until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$286K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Rolling Suds unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $419,193 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $186K–$252K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $59K–$75K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$286K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$419K
Per unit, per year

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
5 outlets
vs category median 32 · small
Range (low → high)
$207K→$671KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 48 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
6 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank11th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank68th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank56th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank51th
vs Cleaning & Maintenance peers
Risk score rank21th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 191 Cleaning & Maintenance brands

Showing the headline figures — all 152 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $419K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.9x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 10.0% — above the Cleaning & Maintenance median of 8.3%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 6/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence. Sample size of 5 outlets — treat as directional only.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Cleaning & Maintenance medians

How Rolling Suds Compares

Metric
Rolling Suds
Category median
vs median
Investment
$219K
$169Kmiddle half $115K–$269K · n=170
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$419K
$538Kmiddle half $349K–$1.1M · n=59
Below median, worse than category
Unit Count
67
51middle half 12–108 · n=169
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Cleaning & Maintenance brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units67Verified — printed on page 53 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
67
Opened
57
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
3
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
1%
vs corporate-owned

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
7
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
177
2.64 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
63
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
10.5%
Owners selling to other franchisees
2022
0
Franchised units
2023
7+7
Franchised units
2024
64+57
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 26 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

26

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
26
Loan volume
$8.2M
Median loan
$349K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
Limited · 26 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 26 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Limited · 26 loans
5-yr charge-off
Limited · 26 loans
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
7
Defaults
0
Typical loan rate
10.0%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
11.6%
n=560 loans
Jobs supported
123
1.8 per loan
Lender concentration
43%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 100% went to startups / new businesses, 0% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in other services to buildings and dwellings, franchised businesses charge off at 11.6% vs 20.7% for independents — franchising is associated with 44% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing Rolling Suds franchisees

The Huntington National Bank10 loans—
Citizens Bank7 loans—
Needham Bank2 loans—

Showing 3 of 7 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Rolling Suds from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
0.0%
Avg SBA guarantee
66%
Avg interest rate
10.03%
Lender concentration
43.5%
Job velocity
1.8 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
0.0%
NAICS 561790
Jobs supported
123

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 43% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1The Huntington National Bank10$2.2MN/A
2Citizens Bank7$3.1MN/A
3Needham Bank2$315KN/A
4Trustmark Bank1$450KN/A
5First Bank of the Lake1$328KN/A
6Genesee Regional Bank1$300KN/A
7SouthStar Bank, S.S.B.1$200KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
FLFlorida50--
GAGeorgia40--
TXTexas30--
MAMassachusetts20--
MSMississippi20--
NYNew York20--
OKOklahoma20--
CACalifornia10--
OROregon10--
UTUtah10--

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2023
1
2024
2
2025
19
2026
1

Borrower profile

Startup17 (74%)
New (< 2 yr)6 (26%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offLimited · 26 loans
Verdict score70/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier70Verdict score 70/100
High confidence±6 pts
6476

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation required to be disclosed

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · DA Advisory Group PLLC

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $2.7MYr 2: $6.1MTotal: $11.2M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 70 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORNegative net worth -$556,226, net loss -$971,982, but early-stage (2022)
  2. 02MINORNo going-concern note or litigation
  3. 03MINORRevenue $11.16M, 64 franchised units, audited, Item 19

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 152 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 10.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training88 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population225,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ50 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window15 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Curable defaultsℹ1
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationPennsylvania (franchisor's headquarters/discretion per Section 20.1-20.3)
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawPennsylvania
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation required to be disclosed

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
31 hrs
On-the-job training
57 hrs
Training location
On-site and at franchisor location
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
3 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee identifies, Franchisor approves
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

153 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 153 contacts · $49
Free preview
208-540-••••
Unlock all 153 contacts
706-420-••••
913-398-••••
914-259-••••
513-822-••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Rolling Suds franchise?

The total investment to open a Rolling Suds franchise ranges from $186K – $252K, with an initial franchise fee of $55K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Rolling Suds franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Rolling Suds FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $419K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Rolling Suds?

Rolling Suds is franchised by Rolling Suds Franchising LLC. Its parent company is Rolling Suds Holdings, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Rolling Suds FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Rolling Suds FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Rolling Suds's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Rolling Suds (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Rolling Suds franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Rolling Suds has 67 total units in the United States, including 64 franchised units and 3 company-owned units. 57 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Rolling Suds a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Rolling Suds as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 70 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Rolling Suds, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Cleaning & Maintenance franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Cleaning & Maintenance category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.