Restoration 1 Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026
- Investment
- $127K – $310K
- Disclosed sales
- $1.2M
- gross sales, not profit
- SBA charge-off
- 11.1%
- on 111 loans
Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records
Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology
Restoration 1 is a property-restoration franchise handling water, fire, and mold damage mitigation and repair for homes and businesses. Franchisees run field crews on emergency restoration jobs, often through insurance.
FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026
A Restoration 1 franchise requires a total initial investment of $127K – $310K, including a $60K – $64K franchise fee and an ongoing 7.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average revenue per franchisee was $1.2M. This franchisor reports Item 19 per franchisee rather than per outlet, so the figure is not comparable with per-outlet averages[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 11.1% charge-off rate across 111 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →
Sources, dates and evidence
FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file
Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.
Overview
- Investment
- $127K – $310K
- 48th pct Cleaning & Ma…
- Avg gross sales
- $1.2M
- Per franchisee, not per outlet
- Royalty
- 7.0%
- 38th pct Cleaning & Ma…
- Units
- 298
- 78th pct Cleaning & Ma…
- SBA charge-off
- 11.1%
- % of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category
Quick verdict · Cleaning & Maintenance · color = vs category peers
Green = favorable by >10% vs Cleaning & Maintenance median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)
Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology
Bottom line
- COSTTotal investment $127K – $310K including a $60K franchise fee, 7.0% ongoing royalty.
- RETURNSAverage revenue per franchisee of $1.2M/year (median $645K). Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures.
- RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 64/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 11.1% across 111 loans (above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
- GROWTHPositive: net +5 franchised outlets in the latest year (29 opened, 24 closed); 2 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
- FLAG24 units terminated last reporting year (8.1% of the system). Ask existing franchisees why.
Item 1 · who you're contracting with
The Franchisor
Corporate structure & franchisor financials
- Legal entity
- Archive Franchise Network, LLC
- Parent company
- Archive Enterprises, Inc. (affiliate - owns IP); Alpha Contents Restoration, LLC (affiliate - operates similar business)
- CEO title
- Founder and President/CEO
- Eric W. Ten Eyck
- Incorporated in
- Nevada
- HQ
- 1960 East McFadden Avenue, Santa Ana, California 92705
- Auditor
- Huselton, Morgan & Maultsby, P.C.
- Audited financials
- Franchisor revenue
- $18.8M
- vs $18.3M prior year
Overview
About
- CEO
- Eric W. Ten Eyck
- Headquarters
- TX
- Founded
- 2020
- FDD year
- 2025
- States available
- 41
Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?
Entry cost runs 29% above the typical cleaning & maintenance franchise.
Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7
FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing
Initial investment breakdown
| Cost component | Low | High |
|---|---|---|
| Initial franchise fee | $60K | $60K |
| Working capital (3–6 mo) | $40K | $75K |
| Equipment, build-out, other | $27K | $175K |
| Total initial investment | $127K | $310K |
Source: Restoration 1 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.
Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate
The Vitals
- Total investment
- $127K – $310K
- Middle of category vs category
- Liquid capital req'd
- $40K – $75K
- Bottom third — review vs category
- Franchise fee
- $60K – $64K
- Bottom third — review vs category
- Royalty
- 7.0%
- Set by a formula · typical 6–8%
- Ad fund
- 2.0%
- typical 3–5%
- Total fee load
- 9.0%
- vs 9–13% typical
Ongoing fees · Item 6
| Fee | Amount |
|---|---|
| Royalty | 7.0% of gross sales |
| Marketing / ad fund | 2.0% |
| Technology fee | $525 |
| Transfer fee | $5K |
| Renewal fee | $10K |
| Total fee load | 9.0% of rev |
What do units actually make?
Average unit sales run 128% above the cleaning & maintenance norm.
Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures
Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19
Single-unit · not modelled
Returns at a glance
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Restoration 1 until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.
—
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
Total invested capital · disclosed
$276K
Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.
ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
What one unit earns on your invested capital
Model A · Single-Unit Return
Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.
Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.
Returns model · single-unit ROIC
What would one Restoration 1 unit return on the cash you put in?
Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.
Unlevered ROIC · per unit
Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.
—
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
What 25 units return when you use SBA financing
Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition
Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).
This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.
What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.
Not modelled yet
An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.
A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.
These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.
Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD
Financial Performance
Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures
- Avg gross sales
- $1.2M
- Per franchisee, per year — not per outlet
- Median gross sales
- $645K
- Per franchisee, not per outlet
Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.
- Item 19 type
- gross sales
- Sample size
- 140 franchisees
- vs category median 32 · large
- Reporting year
- 2023
- Fiscal year the figures cover
- Source filing
- FDD 2025
- Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2023
- Transparency
- 4 / 10
- vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Compared against 191 Cleaning & Maintenance brands
Operator outlook
What the numbers say
Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.
Unit economics
The average franchisee generates $1.2M/year in gross sales. Median is $645K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less.
Fee burden
Total ongoing fee load of 9.0% (near the Cleaning & Maintenance median).
Disclosure
Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.
Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.
vs Cleaning & Maintenance medians
How Restoration 1 Compares
Per franchisee, not per outlet - the category median is per-outlet only, so no comparison is shown
Category median of published Cleaning & Maintenance brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.
Is the system healthy?
Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20
Unit growth
Item 20 · unit dynamics
The Growth Chart
- Total units
- 298
- Opened
- 29
- Last reporting year
- Closed
- 24
- Terminated
- 24
- Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
- Non-renewed
- 0
- Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
- Turnover rate
- 8.1%
- Company-owned
- 0
- Corporate units in the system
- % franchised
- 67%
- vs corporate-owned
Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers
- Terminated
- 24
- Not renewed
- 0
- Transferred
- 0
- Reacquired
- 0
- Franchisor bought back
- Signed, not yet open
- 2
- 0.01 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
- Projected new
- 0
- Franchisor's next-year forecast
Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.
Item 20 · 39 states with active franchisees
The Territory Map
Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).
States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.
Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list
171 current owners across 39 states.
- TX 22
- CA 10
- GA 10
- FL 8
- CO 7
- MI 7
- VA 7
- CT 6
- IL 6
- MO 6
- WA 6
- AL 5
- +27 more states
Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 24 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.
SBA loan performance
Government records
SBA Loan Data
Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.
- Total loans
- 111
- Loan volume
- $25.1M
- Median loan
- $150K
- 50th percentile
- Charge-off rate
- 11.1%
- on 111 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology
Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated
- Repayment rate (PIF)
- 88.9%
- 5-yr charge-off
- 20.7%
- Loans approved 2021+
- Active lenders
- 32
- Defaults
- 6
- Typical loan rate
- 7.8%
- avg rate to borrowers
- Franchised industry avg
- 12.9%
- brand beats franchise avg ↓
- Jobs supported
- 532
- 2.7 per loan
- Lender concentration
- 35%
- top lender's share
Borrower mix: 80% went to startups / new businesses, 20% to established operators
Franchise vs independent — in remediation services, franchised businesses charge off at 12.9% vs 10.4% for independents — franchising is associated with 24% higher SBA default risk in this category.
Vintage analysis
Restoration 1 charge-off rate by loan vintage
Top lenders financing Restoration 1 franchisees
Showing 3 of 32 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.
Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.
Lender network · 7(a) + 504
SBA Lending Report
Full lending analysis for Restoration 1 from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.
- Principal loss rate
- 3.5%
- Avg SBA guarantee
- 76%
- Avg interest rate
- 7.79%
- Avg chargeoff amount
- $113K
- Lender concentration
- 34.6%
- Job velocity
- 2.7 per $100K
- Startup risk premium
- +19.4pp
- NAICS benchmark
- 10.2%
- NAICS 562910
- Jobs supported
- 532
Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 35% of loans
| # | Lender | Loans | Volume | Default % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Midwest Savings Bank National Association | 28 | $4.1M | 35.7% |
| 2 | The Huntington National Bank | 9 | $898K | 0.0% |
| 3 | Peoples Bank | 6 | $676K | 0.0% |
| 4 | Live Oak Banking Company | 5 | $1.5M | 0.0% |
| 5 | Readycap Lending, LLC | 4 | $1.7M | N/A |
| 6 | Stearns Bank National Association | 3 | $417K | 50.0% |
| 7 | Celtic Bank Corporation | 2 | $270K | 0.0% |
| 8 | Community National Bank | 2 | $95K | 0.0% |
| 9 | Legacy National Bank | 2 | $147K | 0.0% |
| 10 | West Bank | 2 | $210K | 0.0% |
Geographic failure vector
| State | Loans | Defaults | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| CACalifornia | 10 | 2 | 50.0% |
| OHOhio | 6 | 1 | 25.0% |
| TXTexas | 6 | 1 | 100.0% |
| GAGeorgia | 5 | 0 | -- |
| MIMichigan | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| NYNew York | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| COColorado | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| MSMississippi | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| ARArkansas | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| AZArizona | 3 | 0 | -- |
SBA 7(a) lending trend
Borrower profile
Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict
What could kill this investment?
SBA loans charge off at 11.1% — 31% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.
Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21
Risk analysis
FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21
Risk & Legal
Bankruptcy (Item 4)
None disclosed
Audited financials (Item 21)
Yes · Huselton, Morgan & Maultsby, P.C.
Franchisor revenue (Item 21)
Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)
Franchisor entity itself reported $0 revenue in both FY2022 and FY2023 per audited financial statements
Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16
- Franchisor sells you products: Yes
- Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
- Must buy proprietary products: Yes
- Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
- Can negotiate own supplier terms: No
Score breakdown · what drove the 64 / 100 verdict
- 01MINORNear-zero net worth $13,144, zero revenue
- 02MINORTiny 3-unit early-stage system
Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification
Litigation case detail7 matters · Item 3
Litigation cases
The franchisor
Pending (1)
Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC v. Coast 2 Coast Restoration LLC, Robert A. Lee, Jr. and Anthony Aceto
pendingBrought against a franchisee · filed 2023-03-13 · United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas · Case No. 23-cv-005490
“Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC v. Coast 2 Coast Restoration LLC, Robert A. Lee, Jr. and Anthony Aceto,United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Case No. 23-cv-005490), filed March 13, 2023. We filed a lawsuit against our former franchisee, Coast 2 Coast Restoration LLC (“Coast 2 Coast”),”Page 12 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Concluded (6)
Aaron Cline v. Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC
settledBrought by a franchisee · filed 2016 · American Arbitration Association · Case No. 01-16-0002-0987
“Aaron Cline v. Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC filed with the American Arbitration Association (Case No. 01-16-0002-0987). On or about May 27, 2016, Aaron Cline, a California franchisee, our former franchisee, filed a demand for arbitration against us asserting claims for fraudulent and deceptive trade practices and misrepresentations in our disclosure document.”Page 13 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“On August 29, 2016, the parties settled all claims whereby the parties agreed to terminate the plaintiff’s Restoration 1 franchise agreement and exchanged mutual releases.”
Abraham Newman v. Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC and Andor Kovacs
concludedBrought by a franchisee · filed 2015-08-10 · American Arbitration Association · Case No. 01-15-0004-6266
“Abraham Newman v. Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC and Andor Kovacs filed with the American Arbitration Association (Case No. 01-15-0004-6266), August 10, 2015.”Page 13 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“On January 31, 2016, the parties agreed to terminate the plaintiffs’ Restoration 1 franchise agreements and exchanged mutual releases.”
Gregory Wayne Stephens v. Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC and Andor Kovacs
concludedBrought by a franchisee · filed 2015-08-10 · American Arbitration Association · Case No. 01-15-0004-6267
“Gregory Wayne Stephens v. Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC and Andor Kovacs, filed with the American Arbitration Association (Case No. 01-15-0004-6267), August 10, 2015. Former franchisees filed demands for arbitration against our principal and us asserting claims for contractual violations, misrepresentations, and deceptive and unfair trade practices.”Page 13 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“On January 31, 2016, the parties agreed to terminate the plaintiffs’ Restoration 1 franchise agreements and exchanged mutual releases.”
Leo Reyes v. Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC and Andor Kovacs
settledBrought by a franchisee · filed 2015 · American Arbitration Association · Case No. 01-15-0005-2169
“Leo Reyes v. Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC and Andor Kovacs filed with the American Arbitration Association (Case No. 01-15-0005-2169). On or about September 30, 2015, Leo Reyes, our former franchisee, filed a demand for arbitration against our principal and us asserting claims for misrepresentations/fraud, violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act”Page 13 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“On January 31, 2016, the parties settled all claims whereby the parties agreed to terminate the plaintiff’s Restoration 1 franchise agreement and exchanged mutual releases.”
Restoration 1 of Boca Raton, LLC, Abraham Newman, and Erick Aguilar v. Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC and Andor Kovacs
concludedBrought by a franchisee · filed 2015-08-15 · American Arbitration Association · Case No. 01-15-0004-06979
“Restoration 1 of Boca Raton, LLC, Abraham Newman, and Erick Aguilar v. Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC and Andor Kovacs filed with the American Arbitration Association (Case No. 01-15-0004-06979), August 15, 2015.”Page 13 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“On January 31, 2016, the parties agreed to terminate the plaintiffs’ Restoration 1 franchise agreements and exchanged mutual releases.”
Commonwealth of Virginia, ex rel. State Corporation Commission v. Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC and Andor Kovacs
settledGovernment or regulatory action · Virginia State Corporation Commission · Case No. SEC-2014-00028
“Commonwealth of Virginia, ex rel. State Corporation Commission v. Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC and Andor Kovacs, (Case No. SEC-2014-00028). On July 16, 2014, we entered into a Settlement Order with the Virginia State Corporation Commission based upon the allegation that we offered and sold a franchise in Virginia after our Virginia registration had lapsed.”Page 13 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3
Outcome:“We neither admitted nor denied the allegations but nonetheless agreed to the terms of the Settlement Order whereby we paid $1,000 to”
Item 3 lists the litigation the franchisor must disclose; a matter against a parent, an affiliate or a named officer is not a matter against the franchisor, and pending claims are allegations, not findings.
What are you signing up for?
Ongoing fees run about 9.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.
Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17
FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal
Contract & Territory Detail
| Initial term | 10 years |
|---|---|
| Renewal term | 10 years |
| Allowed renewalsℹ | 1 |
| Territory type | Exclusive territory |
| Protected territory | No |
| Exclusive territoryℹ | Yes |
| Territory sizeℹ | 250,000 to 1,000,000 households |
| Online sales rights | Restricted |
| Franchisor can compete | Yes |
| Hire a manager? | Allowed |
| Owner-operator | Required |
| Non-compete (years)ℹ | 2 years |
| Non-compete (miles)ℹ | 20 mi |
| Right of first refusalℹ | Yes |
| RoFR response window | 30 days |
| Transfer requires consent | Yes |
| Termination notice | 30 days |
| Termination groundsℹ | 22 |
| Curable defaultsℹ | 11 |
| Mandatory arbitration | Yes |
| Jury trial waiver | Yes |
| Governing law | Texas |
| Litigation count | 7 |
Items 10, 11
Training & Operations
- Classroom training
- 110 hrs
- On-the-job training
- 8 hrs
- Ongoing training
- Required
- Site selection
- franchisor approval of franchisee-proposed site; minimum 5,000 sq ft warehouse/industrial space
- Franchisor financing
- Not offered
- Item 10
- POS system
- Xcelerate
- Operating tech stack
Items 5 & 11
Franchisor Support
Technology: Xcelerate
Item 20 · call current owners
Franchisee Contacts
195 owners to call
Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20
Frequently asked questions
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does it cost to open a Restoration 1 franchise?
The total investment to open a Restoration 1 franchise ranges from $127K – $310K, with an initial franchise fee of $60K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).
What do Restoration 1 franchise owners earn?
According to Item 19 of the Restoration 1 FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.2M. The median is $645K. Important context: Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.
Who owns Restoration 1?
Restoration 1 is franchised by Archive Franchise Network, LLC. Its parent company is Archive Enterprises, Inc. (affiliate - owns IP); Alpha Contents Restoration, LLC (affiliate - operates similar business). Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.
What is Item 19 in the Restoration 1 FDD?
The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Restoration 1 FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.
What is Restoration 1's franchise failure rate?
Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Restoration 1 has a charge-off rate of 11.1% across 111 loans, meaning 11.1% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.
How many Restoration 1 franchise locations are there?
As of their most recent FDD filing, Restoration 1 has 298 total units in the United States, including 298 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 29 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.
Is Restoration 1 a good franchise to buy?
FranchiseVerdict rates Restoration 1 as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 64 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.
Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.
For franchisors
Are you the franchisor?
If you represent Restoration 1, you can request corrections or provide updated information.
Other Cleaning & Maintenance franchises
Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Cleaning & Maintenance category
Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.