Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Prime IV Hydration & Wellness logo

Prime IV Hydration & Wellness Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

HealthcareCOFranchising since 2020
AStrongest tierStrongest tier73/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$191K – $632K
Disclosed sales
$567K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
0.0%
on 56 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02038FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent95%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Prime IV Hydration & Wellness is a healthcare franchise offering IV vitamin drips, hydration therapy, and wellness infusions in a spa-like setting. Franchisees run a clinic staffing nurses and managing treatments, memberships, and inventory.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Prime IV Hydration & Wellness franchise requires a total initial investment of $191K – $632K, including a $49K franchise fee. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $567K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 0.0% charge-off rate across 56 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored6 of 6 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$191K – $632K
41st pct Healthcare
Avg gross sales
$567K
11th pct Healthcare
Royalty
Not extracted
Units
154
68th pct Healthcare
SBA charge-off
0.0%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Healthcare · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$191K – $632K
Median $321K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$49K – $49K
Median $50K
near median
Liquid Capital Req'd
$15K – $15K
Median $40K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
$567K
Median $676K
below median ↓, worse than category
Royalty Rate
Not extracted
Median 7.0%
Ongoing Fees
8.0% of rev
Median 8.0%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
0.0%
56 loans · Median 2.6%
below median ↓, better than category
System Size
154 units
Median 23 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
3.9%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
2 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Healthcare median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $191K – $632K including a $49K franchise fee.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $567K/year (median $539K).
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 73/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 0.0% across 56 loans (well below the franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +53 franchised outlets in the latest year (59 opened, 6 closed) (Item 20).
  • FLAGItem 4 discloses a bankruptcy of an officer or of a company an officer ran, not of the franchisor. Review Item 4 for details.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Prime I.V. Hydration & Wellness, Inc.
Predecessor
Revivology Franchising, Inc.
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Amy Neary
Incorporated in
Wyoming
HQ
1434 Kelly Johnson Blvd., Colorado Springs, CO 80920
Auditor
Gilbert & Stewart
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$6.9M
vs $10.6M prior year

Overview

About

CEO
Amy Neary
Headquarters
CO
Founded
2019
FDD year
2025
States available
35

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 28% above the typical healthcare franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$191K – $632KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 21 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$49,000Verified — printed on page 14 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
RoyaltyNot extracted
Ad fundNot extracted
Working capital$15K – $15K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Prime IV Hydration & Wellness: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$49K$49K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$15K$15K
Equipment, build-out, other$127K$568K
Total initial investment$191K$632K

Source: Prime IV Hydration & Wellness 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$191K – $632K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$15K – $15K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$49K – $49K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
7% of Gross Revenues
Ad fund
No advertising fund is currently maintained for Area Repr…
Total fee load
8.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Prime IV Hydration & Wellness: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Technology fee$249
Transfer fee$15K
Renewal fee$12K
Total fee load8.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 16% below the healthcare norm.

Avg gross sales$567KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 52 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$539KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 50 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size99 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Prime IV Hydration & Wellness until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for royalty rate, ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$426K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Prime IV Hydration & Wellness unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $567,075 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundnot set
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $191K–$632K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $15K–$15K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for royalty rate, ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$426K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for royalty rate, ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$567K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$539K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
99 outlets
vs category median 20 · large
Range (low → high)
$149K→$1.4MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 52 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 3 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank11th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank41th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank
No comparison data
Unit count rank68th
vs Healthcare peers
Risk score rank11th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 162 Healthcare brands

Showing the headline figures — all 132 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $567K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 1.4x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 8.0% (near the Healthcare median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 187.5% CAGR over 3 years across 154 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Healthcare medians

How Prime IV Hydration & Wellness Compares

Metric
Prime IV Hydration & Wellness
Category median
vs median
Investment
$411K
$321Kmiddle half $178K–$530K · n=133
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$567K
$676Kmiddle half $496K–$929K · n=48
Below median, worse than category
Unit Count
154
23middle half 5–101 · n=132
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Healthcare brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units154Verified — printed on page 54 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+187.5% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate3.9% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
154
Opened
59
Last reporting year
Closed
6
Terminated
4
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
3.9%
Company-owned
2
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+187.5%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+187.5%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
4
Not renewed
0
Transferred
1
Reacquired
2
Franchisor bought back
Projected new
3
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2022
47
Franchised units
2023
99+52
Franchised units
2024
152+53
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 31 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 31 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

93 current owners across 30 states; 3 former (terminated, transferred or not renewed) listed separately.

  • FL 16
  • TX 10
  • CO 6
  • OH 6
  • GA 5
  • AL 4
  • NC 4
  • TN 4
  • ID 3
  • IL 3
  • MD 3
  • NJ 3
  • +18 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

A
SBA Lending Health
Excellent SBA lending record · 0.0% charge-off
Total loans
56
Loan volume
$15.7M
Median loan
$297K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
0.0%
on 56 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
100.0%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
18
Defaults
0
Typical loan rate
10.0%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
17.4%
brand beats franchise avg ↓
Jobs supported
457
2.9 per loan
Lender concentration
57%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 98% went to startups / new businesses, 2% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in other personal care services, franchised businesses charge off at 17.4% vs 20.9% for independents — franchising is associated with 17% lower SBA default risk in this category.

Top lenders financing Prime IV Hydration & Wellness franchisees

The Huntington National Bank32 loans0.0%
First Bank of the Lake3 loans—
FWBank3 loans—

Showing 3 of 18 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Prime IV Hydration & Wellness from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
0.0%
Avg SBA guarantee
67%
Avg interest rate
10.01%
Lender concentration
57.1%
Job velocity
2.9 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
5.1%
NAICS 812199
Jobs supported
457

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 57% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1The Huntington National Bank32$6.5M0.0%
2First Bank of the Lake3$1.3MN/A
3FWBank3$1.3MN/A
4Five Star Bank2$620K0.0%
5Stearns Bank National Association2$994KN/A
6America First FCU2$178K0.0%
7VelocitySBA, LLC1$414KN/A
8Celtic Bank Corporation1$390KN/A
9Community Bank & Trust-West Georgia1$438KN/A
10Newtek Small Business Finance, Inc.1$265KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
GAGeorgia70--
UTUtah600.0%
FLFlorida50--
OHOhio40--
TXTexas40--
AZArizona300.0%
COColorado300.0%
CACalifornia20--
IDIdaho20--
ILIllinois20--

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2022
7
2023
18
2024
13
2025
16
2026
2

Borrower profile

Startup48 (86%)
New (< 2 yr)7 (13%)
Ownership change1 (2%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

Lending insight

With a 0.0% charge-off rate across 56 loans, banks have historically viewed this brand favorably for lending.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 0.0% — 100% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off0.0% · 56 loans
Verdict score73/100 (higher is better)
Litigation2 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier73Verdict score 73/100
High confidence±4 pts
6977

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

Subject: an officer. An officer’s own bankruptcy or a company an officer ran, not the franchisor’s

On July 8, 2024, CSG Holdings CA, LLC and CSG Holdings TX, LLC each filed voluntary bankruptcy petitions under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Gilbert & Stewart

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $6.9MYr 2: $10.6MTotal: $3.5MNon-royalty: $1.4M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Item 21 references audited financials for FY2022/2021/2020 in Exhibit D, but the financial statement pages are image-only and contain no extractable text; no balance sheet or income figures could be read.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: No
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: Yes

Score breakdown · what drove the 73 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORNegative net worth -$2,945,529
  2. 02MINORNo litigation/bankruptcy; audited

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 132 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

Litigation case detail2 matters · Item 3

Litigation cases

The franchisor

Pending (1)

  • Virginia State Corporation Commission, Division of Securities and Retail Franchising v. Prime I.V. Hydration & Wellness, Inc.

    pending

    Government or regulatory action · filed 2025-04-03 · Virginia State Corporation Commission · SEC-2024-00045

    “v. Prime I.V. Hydration & Wellness, Inc. (SEC-2024-00045) On April 3, 2025, in response to self-reporting, the Virginia State Corporation Commission, Division of Securities and Retail Franchising (“Division”) initiated an investigation against Prime I.V. Hydration & Wellness, Inc. (“Prime I.V.”), alleging seven violations of the Virginia Retail Franchising Act”Page 13 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

Concluded (1)

  • Washington Department of Financial Institutions, Securities Division Action

    concluded

    Government or regulatory action · filed 2023 · Washington Department of Financial Institutions, Securities Division · Case No. S-23-3663-23- CO01

    “Washington Department of Financial Institutions, Securities Division Action. Case No. S-23-3663-23- CO01 (December 2023). We entered into a Development Agreement and two Franchise Agreements with two Washington franchisees and collected Development Fees and Initial Franchise Fees when we were required by the state of Washington to defer payment of these fees until the Centers were operational.”Page 14 of the 2025 FDD, Item 3

    Outcome:“On December 11, 2023, we signed a Consent Order and agreed to pay $2,000 to the state to cover the costs of the investigation and agreed to cease and desist from violating the terms of our franchise registration permit with the state.”

Item 3 lists the litigation the franchisor must disclose; a matter against a parent, an affiliate or a named officer is not a matter against the franchisor, and pending claims are allegations, not findings.

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 8.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training40 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory sizeℹTrade area / Fixed geographic boundaries
Online sales rightsRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ25 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window60 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ13
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawColorado
Litigation count2

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
24 hrs
On-the-job training
16 hrs
Ongoing training
Required
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

96 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 96 contacts · $49
Free preview
970 302 ••••CO
Unlock all 96 contacts
954 649 ••••TN
205 518 ••••AL
480 720 ••••ID
303503••••CO

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Prime IV Hydration & Wellness franchise?

The total investment to open a Prime IV Hydration & Wellness franchise ranges from $191K – $632K, with an initial franchise fee of $49K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Prime IV Hydration & Wellness franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Prime IV Hydration & Wellness FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $567K. The median is $539K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Prime IV Hydration & Wellness?

Prime IV Hydration & Wellness is franchised by Prime I.V. Hydration & Wellness, Inc.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Prime IV Hydration & Wellness FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Prime IV Hydration & Wellness FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Prime IV Hydration & Wellness's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Prime IV Hydration & Wellness has a charge-off rate of 0.0% across 56 loans, meaning 0.0% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Prime IV Hydration & Wellness franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Prime IV Hydration & Wellness has 154 total units in the United States, including 152 franchised units and 2 company-owned units. 59 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Prime IV Hydration & Wellness a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Prime IV Hydration & Wellness as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 73 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Prime IV Hydration & Wellness, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Healthcare franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Healthcare category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.