Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Play It Again Sports logo

Play It Again Sports Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

RetailMNFranchising since 1988
AStrongest tierStrongest tier81/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$346K – $460K
Disclosed sales
$1.2M
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
6.0%
on 114 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-01983FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent91%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Exclusive territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Play It Again Sports is a resale-retail franchise buying, selling, and trading new and used sporting goods and fitness equipment. Franchisees run stores sourcing used gear directly from local sellers, then pricing and reselling.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Play It Again Sports franchise requires a total initial investment of $346K – $460K, including a $15K – $25K franchise fee and an ongoing 5.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $1.2M[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 6.0% charge-off rate across 114 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$346K – $460K
38th pct Retail
Avg gross sales
$1.2M
15th pct Retail
Royalty
5.0%
6th pct Retail
Units
309
39th pct Retail
SBA charge-off
6.0%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Retail · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$346K – $460K
Median $336K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$15K – $25K
Median $35K
below median ↓, better than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$40K – $50K
Median $35K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$1.2M
Median $803K
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
5.0%
Median 5.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
5.0% of rev
Median 8.0%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
6.0%
114 loans · Median 14.7%
below median ↓, better than category
System Size
309 units
Median 61 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
1.3%
Median 3.0%
below median ↓, better than category
Territory
Exclusive
No other outlet of the brand may open inside it
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Retail median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $346K – $460K including a $25K franchise fee, 5.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $1.2M/year (median $1.0M).
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 81/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 6.0% across 114 loans (near or below the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +7 franchised outlets in the latest year (15 opened, 0 closed) (Item 20).

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Winmark Corporation
Parent company
Winmark Corporation
FDD Item 1, page 7 of the 2026 FDD
CEO title
Chair of the Board, Director and Chief Executive Officer
Brett D. Heffes
Incorporated in
MN
HQ
605 Highway 169 N, Suite 400, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441
Auditor
Grant Thornton LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$86.1M
vs $81.3M prior year

Independent franchisee associations

  • Franchise Advisory Council (FAC)

Franchisee-led councils or alliances disclosed in Item 20. Indicates operator voice.

Overview

About

CEO
Brett D. Heffes
Headquarters
MN
Founded
1988
FDD year
2026
States available
46

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 20% above the typical retail franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$346K – $460KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 17 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$25,000Verified — printed on page 12 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 13 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fundNot extracted
Working capital$40K – $50K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown13 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
INITIAL FRANCHISE FEE$25K$25K
FIXTURES AND SUPPLIES$40K$52K
SIGNS$11K$16K
SECURITY SYSTEM AND/OR CAMERAS$2K$4K
POINT-OF-SALE (POS) SYSTEM$19K$23K
LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS$7K$12K
BUILD-OUT$35K$55K
DEPOSITS AND BUSINESS LICENSES$8K$18K
LETTER OF CREDIT$0$5K
OPENING INVENTORY$100K$120K
MISCELLANEOUS PRE-OPENING EXPENSES$40K$50K
RENT - FIRST 3 MONTHS$20K$30K
ADDITIONAL FUNDS - 3 MONTHS$40K$50K
Total initial investment$346K$460K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$346K – $460K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$40K – $50K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$15K – $25K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
5.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
-n/d
Total fee load
5.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Play It Again Sports: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty5.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$0
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$10K
Inventory (initial)$100K – $120K
Total fee load5.0% of rev
Fee structure insight

A 5.0% total fee load is unusually lean. More of each revenue dollar stays with the franchisee.

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 46% above the retail norm.

Avg gross sales$1.2MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 45 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$1.0MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 45 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales and gross prof…
Sample size287 outlets

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Play It Again Sports until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$448K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Play It Again Sports unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $1,172,630 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $346K–$460K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $40K–$50K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$448K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for ad fund rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$1.2M
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$1.0M

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales and gross profit
Sample size
287 outlets
vs category median 46 · large
Range (low → high)
$223K→$7.1MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 45 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
$533K→$2.1M
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
6 / 10
vs category median 3 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank15th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank38th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank6th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank39th
vs Retail peers
Risk score rank3th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 278 Retail brands

Showing the headline figures — all 155 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $1.2M/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 2.9x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 5.0% — below the Retail median of 8.0%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 6/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 5.1% CAGR over 3 years across 309 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Retail medians

How Play It Again Sports Compares

Metric
Play It Again Sports
Category median
vs median
Investment
$403K
$336Kmiddle half $198K–$495K · n=128
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$1.2M
$803Kmiddle half $529K–$1.1M · n=54
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
309
61middle half 14–208 · n=126
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Retail brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units309Verified — printed on page 47 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth+5.1% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate1.3% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
309
Opened
15
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
7
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
1
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
1.3%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+5.1%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+5.1%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
7
Not renewed
1
Transferred
7
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Projected new
29
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
4.3%
Owners selling to other franchisees
2023
294
Franchised units
2024
302+8
Franchised units
2025
309+7
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 46 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 46 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

317 current owners across 53 states.

  • ON 23
  • CA 20
  • FL 19
  • IL 16
  • NC 16
  • OH 15
  • MN 14
  • CO 11
  • GA 11
  • MI 10
  • WI 10
  • VA 9
  • +41 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 4 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

A
SBA Lending Health
Excellent SBA lending record · 6.0% charge-off
Total loans
114
Loan volume
$35.6M
Median loan
$278K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
6.0%
on 114 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
94.0%
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
61
Defaults
3
Typical loan rate
7.5%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
31.4%
brand beats franchise avg ↓
Jobs supported
795
2.2 per loan
Lender concentration
13%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 53% went to startups / new businesses, 47% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in sporting goods stores, franchised businesses charge off at 31.4% vs 19.0% for independents — franchising is associated with 65% higher SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

Play It Again Sports charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Play It Again Sports charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 6 vintages from 2014 to 2019. Rates range from 0.0% to 25.0%.0%5%10%15%20%25%'14'15'16'17'18'19

Top lenders financing Play It Again Sports franchisees

The Huntington National Bank15 loans0.0%
U.S. Bank, National Association9 loans0.0%
First Bank of the Lake6 loans—

Showing 3 of 61 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
3
Loan volume
$1.1M
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
15

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Play It Again Sports from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
2.3%
Avg SBA guarantee
69%
Avg interest rate
7.54%
Avg chargeoff amount
$278K
Lender concentration
13.2%
Job velocity
2.2 per $100K
Startup risk premium
+8.3pp
NAICS benchmark
6.7%
NAICS 451110
Jobs supported
795

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 13% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1The Huntington National Bank15$2.7M0.0%
2U.S. Bank, National Association9$2.9M0.0%
3First Bank of the Lake6$2.1MN/A
4Truist Bank5$1.2M0.0%
5Zions Bank, A Division of3$675K0.0%
6KeyBank National Association3$830KN/A
7Columbia Bank3$593K0.0%
8Washington Trust Bank2$285K0.0%
9American Momentum Bank2$871KN/A
10Wells Fargo Bank National Association2$1.7M0.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
OHOhio1200.0%
FLFlorida11150.0%
ILIllinois700.0%
WAWashington600.0%
COColorado500.0%
GAGeorgia500.0%
MAMassachusetts500.0%
MIMichigan500.0%
MOMissouri500.0%
TXTexas5266.7%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2011
2
2012
1
2013
1
2014
8
2015
9
2016
8
2017
4
2018
16
2019
7
2020
3
2021
6
2022
11
2023
15
2024
13
2025
10

Borrower profile

Startup31 (38%)
Ownership change21 (26%)
Existing (2+ yr)14 (17%)
New (< 2 yr)10 (12%)
Unanswered2 (2%)
New (< 1 yr)2 (2%)
Established (5+ yr)1 (1%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 6.0% — 63% below the 16.0% national norm, i.e. lower lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off6.0% · 114 loans
Verdict score81/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier81Verdict score 81/100

Play It Again Sports presents moderate-to-cautionary risk: slow unit growth, undisclosed profitability, and high capital requirements relative to revenue potential warrant deep financial due diligence.

High confidence±4 pts
7785

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation is required to be disclosed in this Item.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Grant Thornton LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $86.1MYr 2: $81.3MNon-royalty: $2.3M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Figures from audited consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations of Winmark Corporation and Subsidiaries (the parent/franchisor entity; Winmark is the franchisor itself and has no parent) for fiscal year ended December 27, 2025, in whole US dollars. Total liabilities = current liabilities 5,666,000 + long-term liabilities 72,900,500 = 78,566,500. Shareholders' equity is a deficit of (53,682,400) due to leveraged share buybacks/$60M debt; assets 24,884,100 = liabilities 78,566,500 + equity (53,682,400), reconciles. Total revenue 86,055,700 comprises royalties 76,352,800, leasing income 2,631,800, merchandise sales 3,282,800, franchise fees 1,525,800, other 2,262,500.

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: No
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 81 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORMinimal unit growth (2.3% YoY) indicates market saturation or declining franchisee interest in a mature system
  2. 02MEDNet income not disclosed in Item 19 prevents ROI verification and suggests weak profitability metrics
  3. 03MINORHigh initial investment ($346,300–$459,700) relative to modest average revenue ($1.17M) yields thin margin potential
  4. 04MED309 units is relatively small for an established brand, suggesting limited system strength and bargaining power
  5. 05MINORNo going concern statement is positive, but combined with slow growth raises questions about system viability

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 155 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 5.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryExclusive (favorable vs category)
Initial training42 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Territory typeExclusive territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹYes
Territory radius5 mi
Territory population50,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ10 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationMinneapolis, Minnesota
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawMN
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation is required to be disclosed in this Item.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
42 hrs
On-the-job training
18 hrs
Training location
Minneapolis, MN (Winmark training center); online; and local store level
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
12 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
franchisee with franchisor consent
Franchisor financing
Offered
Item 10
POS system
Winmark POS System (proprietary)
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Technology: Winmark POS System (proprietary)

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

321 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 321 contacts · $49
Free preview
970-836-••••CO
Unlock all 321 contacts
352-377-••••FL
440-777-••••OH
978-537-••••MA
239-274-••••FL

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Play It Again Sports franchise?

The total investment to open a Play It Again Sports franchise ranges from $346K – $460K, with an initial franchise fee of $25K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Play It Again Sports franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Play It Again Sports FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $1.2M. The median is $1.0M. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Play It Again Sports?

Play It Again Sports is franchised by Winmark Corporation. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Play It Again Sports FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Play It Again Sports FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Play It Again Sports's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Play It Again Sports has a charge-off rate of 6.0% across 114 loans, meaning 6.0% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Play It Again Sports franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Play It Again Sports has 309 total units in the United States, including 309 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 15 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Play It Again Sports a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Play It Again Sports as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 81 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Play It Again Sports, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Retail franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Retail category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.