Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Patrice & Associates logo

Patrice & Associates Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Business ServicesAZFranchising since 2008
CAverageAverage38/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$105K – $121K
Disclosed sales
$19K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
33.3%
on 97 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-01899FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent95%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Patrice & Associates is a recruiting franchise specializing in hospitality and restaurant management placements, plus broader executive search. Franchisees run a recruiting practice sourcing candidates, working with employers, and earning placement fees, typically home-based.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Patrice & Associates franchise requires a total initial investment of $105K – $121K, including a $65K franchise fee and an ongoing 10.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average unit revenue was $19K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 33.3% charge-off rate across 97 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: C (Average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$105K – $121K
35th pct Business Serv…
Avg gross sales
$19K
0th pct Business Serv…
Royalty
10.0%
41st pct Business Serv…
Units
189
55th pct Business Serv…
SBA charge-off
33.3%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Business Services · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$105K – $121K
Median $133K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$65K – $65K
Median $48K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$4K – $6K
Median $23K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
$19K
Median $686K
below median ↓, worse than category
Royalty Rate
10.0%
Median 7.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
Ongoing Fees
0.2% of rev
Median 9.0%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
33.3%
97 loans · Median 11.8%
above median ↑, worse than category
System Size
189 units
Median 39 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
14.3%
Median 3.7%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
3 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Business Services median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $105K – $121K including a $65K franchise fee, 10.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $19K/year (median $3K).
  • RISKVerdict C (Average), verdict score 38/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 33.3% across 97 loans (well above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +1 franchised outlets in the latest year (28 opened, 27 closed) (Item 20).
  • FLAG21 units terminated last reporting year (11.1% of the system). Ask existing franchisees why.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Patrice Franchising, LLC
Parent company
Patrice Holdings, LLC
Predecessor
Patrice & Associates Franchising, Inc.
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Jason C. Miller
CEO experience
8 yrs
Years in role or industry
Incorporated in
DE
HQ
9112 East Verde Grove View, Suite 101-E, Scottsdale, AZ 85255
Auditor
LerroSarbey
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$8.2M
vs $9.3M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Independent franchisee associations

  • Franchise Advisory Council (FAC)

Franchisee-led councils or alliances disclosed in Item 20. Indicates operator voice.

Overview

About

CEO
Jason C. Miller
Headquarters
AZ
Founded
1989
FDD year
2025
States available
41

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 15% below the typical business services franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$105K – $121KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 17 of the 2025 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$65,000Verified — printed on page 12 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty10.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 13 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 13 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$4K – $6K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown14 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Feenot refundable$65K$65K
Initial Training Fee (Franchise Training)not refundable$7K$7K
Initial Training Fee (Manager Training)not refundable$0$4K
Executive Recruiting Training & Certification Feenot refundable$10K$10K
Microsite Feenot refundable$7K$7K
Marketing Starter Kitnot refundable$3K$3K
Grand Opening Marketingnot refundable$6K$12K
Rent & Security Depositnot refundable$0$1K
Computer Systemnot refundable$500$1K
Office Equipment & Suppliesnot refundable$300$500
Business Licenses, Dues & Subscriptionsnot refundable$800$1K
Professional Feesnot refundable$1K$3K
Insurance (3 months' premium)not refundable$500$850
Additional Funds (3 months)not refundable$4K$6K
Total initial investment$105K$121K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$105K – $121K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$4K – $6K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$65K – $65K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
10.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
0.2%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Patrice & Associates: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty10.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$350
Training fee$7K
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$0
Total fee load0.2% of rev
Fee structure insight

A 0.2% total fee load is unusually lean. More of each revenue dollar stays with the franchisee.

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 97% below the business services norm.

Avg gross sales$19KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 37 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$3KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 37 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales by quartile
Sample size189 outlets

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Patrice & Associates until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$118K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Patrice & Associates unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $18,976 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $105K–$121K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $4K–$6K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$118K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$19K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$3K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales by quartile
Sample size
189 outlets
vs category median 37 · large
Range (low → high)
$0→$429KNot cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
$0→$67K
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 3 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank0th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank35th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank41th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank55th
vs Business Services peers
Risk score rank79th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 296 Business Services brands

Showing the headline figures — all 143 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →
Revenue insight

Revenue is only 0.2x the investment. This means each unit may take 5+ years to recoup the initial outlay at typical margins.

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $19K/year in gross sales. Median is $3K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 0.2x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 0.2% — below the Business Services median of 9.0%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 10.5% CAGR over 3 years across 189 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Business Services medians

How Patrice & Associates Compares

Metric
Patrice & Associates
Category median
vs median
Investment
$113K
$133Kmiddle half $79K–$260K · n=193
Below median, better than category
Revenue
$19K
$686Kmiddle half $373K–$1.4M · n=61
Below median, worse than category
Unit Count
189
39middle half 8–116 · n=193
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Business Services brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units189Verified — printed on page 38 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth-4.3% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate14.3% (caution)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
189
Opened
28
Last reporting year
Closed
27
Terminated
21
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
6
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
14.3%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
100%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-4.3%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+10.5%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
21
Not renewed
6
Transferred
2
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
0
0.00 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
0
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
1.1%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Termination rate
16.9%
Franchisor-initiated terminations
Ceased ops
0.5%
Units that stopped operating
2022
171
Franchised units
2023
188+17
Franchised units
2024
189+1
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 23 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 23 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Available to sell in · Item 12

  • California
  • Hawaii
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Maryland
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • New York
  • North Dakota
  • Rhode Island
  • South Dakota
  • Virginia
  • Washington
  • Wisconsin

States where the franchisor is registered to sell new franchises (FDD registration filings).

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

41 current owners across 23 states.

  • FL 5
  • TX 4
  • VA 4
  • CO 3
  • IL 3
  • CT 2
  • IN 2
  • NY 2
  • PA 2
  • AL 1
  • DE 1
  • GA 1
  • +11 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 123 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

F
SBA Lending Health
Weak SBA lending record · 33.3% charge-off
Total loans
97
Loan volume
$12.6M
Median loan
$150K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
33.3%
on 97 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
66.7%
5-yr charge-off
40.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
7
Defaults
14
Typical loan rate
7.8%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
19.8%
brand above franchise avg ↑
Jobs supported
341
2.7 per loan
Lender concentration
72%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 100% went to startups / new businesses, 0% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in employment placement agencies, franchised businesses charge off at 19.8% vs 8.7% for independents — franchising is associated with 128% higher SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

Patrice & Associates charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Patrice & Associates charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 6 vintages from 2015 to 2020. Rates range from 16.7% to 80.0%.0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%'15'16'17'18'19'20

Top lenders financing Patrice & Associates franchisees

United Midwest Savings Bank National Association68 loans42.9%
Celtic Bank Corporation19 loans35.7%
Stearns Bank National Association3 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 7 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Patrice & Associates from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
11.6%
Avg SBA guarantee
84%
Avg interest rate
7.84%
Avg chargeoff amount
$104K
Lender concentration
71.6%
Job velocity
2.7 per $100K
NAICS benchmark
33.3%
NAICS 561311
Jobs supported
341

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 72% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1United Midwest Savings Bank National Association68$9.2M42.9%
2Celtic Bank Corporation19$2.6M35.7%
3Stearns Bank National Association3$322K0.0%
4Cambridge Savings Bank2$85K0.0%
5Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company1$105KN/A
6Union Bank and Trust Company1$100K0.0%
7Community Trust Bank, Inc.1$90K0.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
FLFlorida9116.7%
GAGeorgia700.0%
TXTexas7150.0%
MAMassachusetts600.0%
CACalifornia500.0%
COColorado5266.7%
NYNew York5133.3%
MDMaryland4133.3%
NJNew Jersey400.0%
PAPennsylvania4150.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

2014
1
2015
4
2016
7
2017
13
2018
7
2019
13
2020
12
2021
5
2022
5
2023
14
2024
4
2025
9
2026
1

Borrower profile

Startup70 (100%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

Lending insight

A 33.3% charge-off rate means roughly 1 in 3 franchisees failed to repay their SBA loan. Investigate what changed.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 33.3% — 108% above the 16.0% national norm, i.e. higher lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off33.3% · 97 loans
Verdict score38/100 (higher is better)
Litigation3 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

CAverage38Verdict score 38/100

Stagnant unit growth, litigation history involving misrepresentation/earnings non-disclosure, and absence of transparent financial data create elevated risk despite protected territory.

High confidence±4 pts
3442

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

Two concluded matters involving predecessor PAF: Fischer arbitration (franchisee awarded refund of franchise fees only); Harris/Hospitality Partners AAA arbitration settled for $69,000 refund. One pending civil complaint (Sweeney, CA Superior Court) alleging fraudulent inducement, negligent misrepresentation, and violation of California Franchise Investment Law; damages not less than $125,000; actively defended.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · LerroSarbey

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $8.2MYr 2: $9.3MNon-royalty: $0.7M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 38 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MEDStagnant unit growth (0.5% YoY) indicates system decline or saturation with 189 units showing minimal expansion momentum
  2. 02HIGHHistory of litigation including concluded misrepresentation/breach claims plus pending fraudulent inducement lawsuit alleging failure to disclose earnings
  3. 03MEDHigh initial investment ($105-121K) relative to disclosed average revenue ($18,976) creates immediate profitability concerns and extended break-even timeline
  4. 04MINOR10% royalty on gross sales is extracted regardless of profitability, and with average net income withheld, true take-home pay is opaque
  5. 05MINORPending Sweeney lawsuit specifically alleges failure to disclose earnings — red flag for systemic earnings misrepresentation to franchisees

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 143 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 0.2% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term5 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training50 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term5 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ3
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population250,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window180 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice10 days
Curable defaultsℹ2
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationMaricopa County, Arizona
Jury trial waiverNo
Governing lawDE
Litigation count3
View Item 3 litigation summary

Two concluded matters involving predecessor PAF: Fischer arbitration (franchisee awarded refund of franchise fees only); Harris/Hospitality Partners AAA arbitration settled for $69,000 refund. One pending civil complaint (Sweeney, CA Superior Court) alleging fraudulent inducement, negligent misrepresentation, and violation of California Franchise Investment Law; damages not less than $125,000; actively defended.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
24 hrs
On-the-job training
26 hrs
Training location
Virtual
Ongoing training
Required
Field support
26 hrs/yr
On-site visits per year
Site selection
franchisee
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

164 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 164 contacts · $49
Free preview
330-284-••••
Unlock all 164 contacts
703-362-••••
405-757-••••
787-367-••••IL
704-305-••••

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Patrice & Associates franchise?

The total investment to open a Patrice & Associates franchise ranges from $105K – $121K, with an initial franchise fee of $65K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Patrice & Associates franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Patrice & Associates FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $19K. The median is $3K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Patrice & Associates?

Patrice & Associates is franchised by Patrice Franchising, LLC. Its parent company is Patrice Holdings, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Patrice & Associates FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Patrice & Associates FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Patrice & Associates's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Patrice & Associates has a charge-off rate of 33.3% across 97 loans, meaning 33.3% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Patrice & Associates franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Patrice & Associates has 189 total units in the United States, including 189 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 28 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Patrice & Associates a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Patrice & Associates as a C-grade franchise with a verdict score of 38 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Patrice & Associates, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Business Services franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Business Services category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.