Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
SATELLITE TEAMS logo

Satellite Teams Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Business ServicesPuerto RicoFranchising since 2025
CAverageAverage39/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$92K – $115K
Disclosed sales
partial, no system average
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-02236FDD 2026Data QualityStandard76%
Manager-run OKNo: No territory protection

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Satellite Teams is a staffing franchise providing trained full-time remote employees to support businesses. Franchisees run local operations, sourcing clients and placing remote talent for recurring revenue.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A SATELLITE TEAMS franchise requires a total initial investment of $92K – $115K, including a $70K franchise fee. The 2026 FDD on file does not yield a unit-revenue figure we can publish. FranchiseVerdict grade: C (Average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Limited operating history: franchising since 2025. A system this young has fewer than three years of Item 20 outlet history and rarely enough SBA loans for a charge-off rate, so its grade rests on less evidence than an established system's. Read its Item 20 tables and talk to its first franchisees before relying on the grade. Other new franchisors

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored4 of 4 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$92K – $115K
32nd pct Business Serv…
Avg gross sales
N/A
Company-owned only1 outlet
Royalty
Not extracted
Units
1
2nd pct Business Serv…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Business Services · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$92K – $115K
Median $133K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$70K – $70K
Median $48K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$10K – $15K
Median $23K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
Partial, no system average
No system average in Item 19
Royalty Rate
Not extracted
Median 7.0%
Ongoing Fees
20.0% of rev
Median 9.0%
above median ↑, worse than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
1 units
Median 39 units
below median ↓, worse than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 3.7%
below median ↓, better than category
Territory
None
The franchisor can open or license outlets nearby
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
None disclosed
Clean record

Green = favorable by >10% vs Business Services median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $92K – $115K including a $70K franchise fee.
  • RETURNSItem 19 discloses Total Income for one whole business over two fiscal years - $3,547,206 (2024) and $3,254,671 (2025) - and NO summary statistic of any kind. An earlier version of this note stated that avg_gross_sales $3,400,939 was 'the mean of these two annual whole-business revenue figures', which is exactly what it was: OUR arithmetic, greping nowhere in the 175-page filing, published as though it were a franchisor disclosure. The same construction produced avg_net_income $563,810 over Adjusted Gross Profit. Both withdrawn. The metric is Total Income, not gross sales.
  • RISKVerdict C (Average), verdict score 39/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHNegative, pipeline stalled: 3 agreements signed but not yet open against 1 open outlets (Item 20).
  • FLAGAuditor disclosed a going-concern note, which flagged doubt about the franchisor's ability to continue operations. Verify against the latest FDD.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
SATELLITE TEAMS GLOBAL LLC
Parent company
SATELLITE TEAMS, INC. (Affiliate Co.)
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2026 FDD
Ultimate parent
SATELLITE TEAMS, INC.
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2026 FDD
Predecessor
None
Prior franchisor entity
Incorporated in
Puerto Rico
HQ
1225 Avenida Juan Ponce de León Penthouse, San Juan, PR 00907
Auditor
SingerLewak LLP
Audited financials
⚠ Going-concern note
Disclosed in FDD 2026
Auditor flagged doubt about continued operations. Verify against the latest FDD before deciding.

Affiliated brands

  • SATELLITE TEAMS
  • SATELLITE TEAMS SERVICES
  • Co

Other brands the franchisor or its parent operates (Item 1).

Overview

About

CEO
Geryll Pastor
Headquarters
Puerto Rico
Founded
2025
FDD year
2026
States available
1

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 22% below the typical business services franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$92K – $115KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 17 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$69,999Verified — printed on page 10 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
RoyaltyNot extracted
Ad fund5.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 11 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$10K – $15K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown11 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Feenot refundable$70K$70K
Leasehold Improvementsnot refundable$0$500
Furniture & Fixturesnot refundable$0$1K
CRM/Back Office Systemnot refundable$500$2K
Computer Hardware & Equipmentnot refundable$0$3K
Office Supplies and Equipmentnot refundable$1K$2K
Insurance Coverage (annual cost)not refundable$3K$6K
Initial Training Expensesnot refundable$2K$4K
Attorney and Professional Fees$1K$2K
Initial Launch Marketingnot refundable$5K$10K
Additional Funds (for first 3 months of operation)not refundable$10K$15K
Total initial investment$92K$115K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$92K – $115K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$10K – $15K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$70K – $70K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
The Greater of: (i) $1,500, or (ii) 10% of recruitment fe…
Ad fund
5.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
20.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

SATELLITE TEAMS: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty (flat)Greater of $1,500 or 10% of recruitment fees, 10% of recurring fees, and 10% of add-on fees
Marketing / ad fund5.0% of profit
Technology fee$5
Training fee$400
Transfer fee$2K
Renewal fee$10K
Inventory (initial)$1K – $2K
Total fee load20.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Avg gross salesNot extracted
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size1 outlet

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

No Item 19 revenue figure for SATELLITE TEAMS is on file. The return models need a revenue figure to start from, and the operating costs that turn gross sales into a profit are in no FDD. Enter your own and the calculator runs on your assumptions — nothing here is modelled until you do.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one SATELLITE TEAMS unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearnot set
Item 19 not disclosed. Enter your own revenue assumption
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $92K–$115K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $10K–$15K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for annual revenue, royalty rate, COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$116K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Item 19 discloses Total Income for one whole business over two fiscal years - $3,547,206 (2024) and $3,254,671 (2025) - and NO summary statistic of any kind. An earlier version of this note stated that avg_gross_sales $3,400,939 was 'the mean of these two annual whole-business revenue figures', which is exactly what it was: OUR arithmetic, greping nowhere in the 175-page filing, published as though it were a franchisor disclosure. The same construction produced avg_net_income $563,810 over Adjusted Gross Profit. Both withdrawn. The metric is Total Income, not gross sales.

Company-owned outlets only - not franchisee performance

Based on a single outlet - not a system average

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
1 outlet
vs category median 37 · small
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
7 / 10
vs category median 3 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank32th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank
No comparison data
Unit count rank2th
vs Business Services peers
Risk score rank76th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 296 Business Services brands

Showing the headline figures — all 126 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 20.0% — above the Business Services median of 9.0%.

Disclosure

Item 19 reports outlet revenue, but not in a form that yields a per-outlet average we can compare across brands.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Business Services medians

How Satellite Teams Compares

Metric
Satellite Teams
Category median
vs median
Investment
$104K
$133Kmiddle half $79K–$260K · n=193
Below median, better than category
Revenue
N/A
$686Kmiddle half $373K–$1.4M · n=61
N/A
Unit Count
1
39middle half 8–116 · n=193
Below median, worse than category

Category median of published Business Services brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units1Verified — printed on page 41 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
1
Opened
0
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
0%
vs corporate-owned

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
3
3.00 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
3
Franchisor's next-year forecast

No multi-year history disclosed and no opening/closing activity in the last reporting year.

Item 12 · 1 state reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

1

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

3 current owners across 2 states.

  • FL 2
  • VA 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 1 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

The auditor flagged going-concern doubt (Item 21) — the single biggest risk here.

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score39/100 (higher is better)
Litigation0 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtYes (worth scrutinizing)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

CAverage39Verdict score 39/100

Pre-opening/startup franchisor (began franchising 2025) with only 1 company-owned unit and zero franchised units. No litigation, no bankruptcy, audited financials, and Item 19 disclosed with $3,254,671 revenue. Limited history is the only real concern.

Low confidence±15 pts
2454

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

No litigation is required to be disclosed in Item 3.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · SingerLewak LLP⚠ Going-concern note flagged

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Total: $3.3M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 39 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORBrand-new franchisor (2025), 0 franchised units
  2. 02MINORNo litigation or bankruptcy
  3. 03MEDAudited financials with $3.25M revenue and Item 19 disclosed

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 126 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 20.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term5 yrs
Renewal term5 yrs
TerritoryNone (caution)
Initial training70 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term5 years
Renewal term5 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Protected territoryNo
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Right of first refusalℹYes
RoFR response window45 days
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice5 days
Termination groundsℹ2
Curable defaultsℹ3
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationPuerto Rico
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawPuerto Rico
Litigation count0
View Item 3 litigation summary

No litigation is required to be disclosed in Item 3.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
25 hrs
On-the-job training
45 hrs
Training location
On-site and at franchisor location
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
2 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
franchisee
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
QuickBooks
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✗Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: QuickBooks

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

4 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 4 contacts · $49
Free preview
239-206-••••FL
Unlock all 4 contacts
703-606-••••VA
939-999-••••
813-503-••••FL

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a SATELLITE TEAMS franchise?

The total investment to open a SATELLITE TEAMS franchise ranges from $92K – $115K, with an initial franchise fee of $70K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do SATELLITE TEAMS franchise owners earn?

Item 19 of the SATELLITE TEAMS FDD discloses figures for part of the system but no single average across all outlets. These are gross sales figures, not profit; the Revenue section shows what the filing reports and on what basis. Item 20 of the FDD lists current and former franchisees; asking them directly is the standard way to fill this gap.

Who owns SATELLITE TEAMS?

SATELLITE TEAMS is franchised by SATELLITE TEAMS GLOBAL LLC. Its parent company is SATELLITE TEAMS, INC. (Affiliate Co.). The ultimate parent named in the FDD is SATELLITE TEAMS, INC.. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the SATELLITE TEAMS FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the SATELLITE TEAMS FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is SATELLITE TEAMS's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for SATELLITE TEAMS (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many SATELLITE TEAMS franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, SATELLITE TEAMS has 1 total units in the United States.

Is SATELLITE TEAMS a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates SATELLITE TEAMS as a C-grade franchise with a verdict score of 39 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent SATELLITE TEAMS, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Business Services franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Business Services category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.