FranchiseVerdict
A Place At Home logo
FV-00045·STRONGExcellent95

A Place At Home

Formerly known as NorEast Mortgage

Health & Wellness - Senior CareFranchising since 2017Website
Investment
$91K – $166K
45th pct Senior Care
Avg revenue
$999K
35th pct Senior Care
Royalty
Units
37
60th pct Senior Care
SBA default
0.0%
vs <3% typical

Bottom line

  • Total investment $91K – $166K including a $50K franchise fee.
  • Average unit revenue of $999K/year (median $975K).
  • Rated STRONG with a risk score of 49/100. SBA loan default rate of 0.0% across 31 loans (below the industry average).
  • System growing at 89.5% CAGR over 3 years with 37 total units — strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Legal entity
NorEast Franchise Group, LLC
Parent company
Dovida North America Inc.
Incorporated in
Nebraska
HQ
11422 Miracle Hills Drive, Suite 450, Omaha, Nebraska 68154
Auditor
Metwally CPA PLLC
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$1.7M
vs $2.0M prior year

Yale framework · single-unit ROIC

Returns Analysis

Pulls Item 7 (investment) and Item 19 (revenue) from this brand's FDD into the Yale unlevered-ROIC formula. Override any input to stress-test it against your own assumptions.

The model · Yale framework

What would one A Place At Home unit return on the cash you put in?

Revenue · per unit, per year
$
FDD Item 19 reports $999,037
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fund
Royaltytyp 68%
%
Ad fundtyp 35%
%
Operating costs · category default: personal services
COGS
%
Labor
%
Rent / occupancy
%
Other operating
%
Total invested capital · what you actually put in
Initial investment
$
FDD Item 7: $91K–$166K
Working capital
$
FDD reports $8K–$51K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

139%

Above typical band (30–60%)

0%30–60% Yale band80%
ROIC above 100% usually means the revenue figure is a system-wide aggregate or top-cohort number rather than a single-unit average. Verify the "Revenue · per unit" field against the brand's FDD Item 19 detail tables before relying on this output.

Store EBITDA · annual
$220K
EBITDA margin
22.0%
Total invested
$158K
Payback
9 mo
Unit-level only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even Yale describes.

Levered LBO scenario · Yale Crease Capital framing

What would 25 A Place At Home units return on equity?

Edit assumptions

Equity IRR · 5-yr

34.3%

4.36× MOIC

Year-1 DSCR

2.37×

EBITDA ÷ debt service

Equity required

$5.5M

on $15.0M purchase

Total debt

$9.5M

SBA $5.0M + senior + seller note

SBA 7(a) request ($7.5M) exceeds the $5M program cap. Excess capped automatically; backfill via conventional or equity.

Overview

About

A Place At Home is a home healthcare services franchise where franchisees operate local care management businesses serving seniors and homebound clients. Franchisees recruit, train, and manage in-home caregivers while handling billing, compliance, and client acquisition. Day-to-day activities include caregiver scheduling, quality assurance, marketing to healthcare providers and families, and managing client relationships in their protected territory.

CEO
Dustin Distefano
Founded
2016
FDD year
2025
States available
15

Item 7 · what it costs

The Vitals

Total investment
$91K – $166K
All-in to open one unit
Liquid capital
$8K – $51K
Cash you must have on hand
Franchise fee
$50K
Royalty
Greater of 5.0% to 5.5% of Gross Sales or Monthly Minimum…
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
7.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Item 19

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$999K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$975K
Item 19 type
Operational Franchise Outlets
Sample size
25 units
vs category median 23
Range (low → high)
$220K$2.9M
Cohort dispersion
Transparency
5 / 5
vs category median 4 / 5 · above
Revenue rank35th
vs Health & Wellness - Senior Care peers
Investment cost rank45th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank71th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank60th
vs Health & Wellness - Senior Care peers
Risk score rank29th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
37
Opened
11
Last reporting year
Closed
7
Turnover rate
18.9%
Company-owned
1
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
97%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (yr3)
+12.5%
Net unit change last year
3-yr CAGR
+89.5%
Compounded over last 3 years
2023
36+3
Franchised units
2024
32
Franchised units
2025
19
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 20 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator — not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Registered · 20 states
Not registered

States derived from franchisee phone area codes (Item 20). Approximate — ported numbers may show the original state, not the franchisee's current location.

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
31
Loan volume
Avg loan
Default rate
0.0%
vs <3% typical · system-wide
5-yr default

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 5, 6, 12, 17

Risk & Legal

49
Risk · 0-100
STRONG49 / 100

Small, litigation-plagued system with profitability opacity, going concern issues, and modest growth makes this a HIGH CAUTION investment requiring extensive validation.

Score breakdown · what drove the 49 / 100 rating

  1. 01MEDNo disclosed net income data despite $999k average revenue — inability or unwillingness to show profitability is concerning for ROI assessment
  2. 02HIGHRecent high-profile litigation (August 2024) involving breach of 8 franchise agreements and non-compete violations signals potential franchisor-franchisee relationship problems
  3. 03MINORModest unit growth of 12.5% YoY with only 37 total units suggests a small, fragile system vulnerable to market downturns
  4. 04HIGHGoing concern status is FALSE — indicates potential financial instability at the corporate level, raising questions about franchisor support and longevity
  5. 05MINORRoyalty structure with undefined 'Monthly Minimum Fee' component lacks transparency and could create unexpected profit drains
  6. 06MEDHigh franchise fee ($49,500) relative to system size and growth rate creates significant upfront risk with limited brand recognition

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

FDD Items 5, 6, 12, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Territory
Geographic area containing Qualified Residents
Protected territory
Yes
Initial term
10 years
Renewal term
10 years
Online sales rights
Restricted
Franchisor can compete
Yes
Hire a manager?
Allowed
Litigation count
1
Right of first refusal
Yes
Franchisor can buy back on resale
Mandatory arbitration
Yes
Jury trial waiver
Yes
Non-compete
2 yrs
Post-termination restriction
Owner-operator
Required
Governing law
Nebraska

Item 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
32 hrs
On-the-job training
13 hrs
POS system
Business Management System
Operating tech stack

Item 20

Franchisee Contacts

Phone numbers extracted directly from this brand's FDD Item 20. After purchase, you'll also receive a list of validation questions tailored to this brand.

Franchisee contacts

43 numbers

Locked
(480) 718-••••
AZ
(503) 908-••••
OR
(407) 554-••••
AZ

One-time purchase · CSV download · Validation questions included

FDD download

A Place At Home · FDD (2025) PDF

Single-page checkout · instant download · CSV export of contacts available separately above