Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Gong cha logo

Gong cha Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Quick-Service RestaurantsMassachusettsFranchising since 2023
BAbove averageAbove average51/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$207K – $648K
Disclosed sales
$397K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Limited · 15 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-01084FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent95%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Gong cha is a bubble tea franchise serving customizable milk teas, fruit teas, and boba drinks. Franchisees run the shops, managing drink prep, ingredient inventory, and counter service.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Gong cha franchise requires a total initial investment of $207K – $648K, including a $35K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $397K[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: B (Above average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing; the rest are marked “Not cited” beside the figure.

Overview

Investment
$207K – $648K
25th pct Service Resta…
Avg gross sales
$397K
Net sales2nd pct Service Resta…
Royalty
6.0%
48th pct Service Resta…
Units
38
61st pct Service Resta…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Quick-Service Restaurants · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$207K – $648K
Median $486K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$35K – $35K
Median $35K
near median
Liquid Capital Req'd
$10K – $87K
Median $33K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$397K
Median $975K
below median ↓, worse than category
Net sales
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 5.5%
near median
Ongoing Fees
7.0% of rev
Median 7.5%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Limited · 15 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 15 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units
System Size
38 units
Median 18 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
N/A
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
4 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Quick-Service Restaurants median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $207K – $648K including a $35K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $397K/year (median $363K).
  • RISKVerdict B (Above average), verdict score 51/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +32 franchised outlets in the latest year (32 opened, 0 closed); 18 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • EARLYEmerging franchise: only 3 years of franchising with 38 units. Early-stage systems carry higher risk but may offer better territory availability.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Gong cha USA Franchising, LLC
Parent company
Gong Cha Americas, Inc. (GCA)
FDD Item 1, page 11 of the 2026 FDD
Ultimate parent
Gong Cha Limited (originally GC Group Topco Limited)
FDD Item 1, page 11 of the 2026 FDD
Predecessor
Gong Cha International Co., Ltd. (f/k/a Royal Tea Taiwan Co. Ltd.) (GCI)
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Global Chief Executive Officer
Paul Reynish
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
200 Clarendon St., Suite #5600, Boston, Massachusetts 02116
Auditor
Citrin Cooperman & Company, LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$4.9M
vs $4.1M prior year

Overview

About

CEO
Paul Reynish
Headquarters
Massachusetts
Founded
2006
FDD year
2026
States available
3

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 12% below the typical quick-service restaurants franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$207K – $648KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 31 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$34,500Not cited — published from our reading of the franchisor's disclosure document; the page it is printed on has not been located.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 22 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund1.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 22 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$10K – $87K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

Full Item 7 breakdown13 line items

Initial investment breakdown

Item 7 initial investment line items
Line itemLowHigh
Initial Franchise Fee$37K$37K
Training Expenses$4K$7K
Architect and Engineering, Fees; Final Layout Review Fee$5K$13K
Leasehold Improvements$52K$271K
Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment$46K$80K
Technology Systems$5K$6K
Exterior Signage$7K$8K
Security and Utility Deposits and Rent$5K$33K
Professional Fees and Business Permits/Licenses$1K$29K
Initial Supplies and Inventory$26K$62K
Grand Opening Advertising$5K$5K
Insurance$5K$12K
Additional Funds - 3 Months$10K$87K
Total initial investment$207K$648K

Line items extracted from FDD Item 7. Ranges reflect the franchisor's stated low and high per line. Total is the sum of line-item lows / highs — actual costs may fall outside this range depending on market and build-out scope.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$207K – $648K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$10K – $87K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$35K – $35K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
6.0%
typical 6–8%
Ad fund
1.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
7.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Gong cha: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund1.0% of net sales
Technology fee$328
Training fee$2K
Transfer fee$19K
Renewal fee$19K
Inventory (initial)$26K – $62K
Total fee load7.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 59% below the quick-service restaurants norm.

Avg gross sales$397K

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 77 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$363KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 77 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typehistorical
Sample size222 outlets

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Gong cha until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$476K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Gong cha unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $396,887 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $207K–$648K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $10K–$87K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$476K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Reported as net sales, not gross sales

Avg gross sales
$397K
Per unit, per year
Median gross sales
$363K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
historical
Sample size
222 outlets
vs category median 19 · large
Range (low → high)
$75K→$993KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 77 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
$199K→$650K
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank2th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank25th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank48th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank61th
vs Quick-Service Restaurants peers
Risk score rank48th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 781 Quick-Service Restaurants brands

Showing the headline figures — all 165 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →
Revenue insight

Revenue is only 0.9x the investment. This means each unit may take 5+ years to recoup the initial outlay at typical margins.

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $397K/year in gross sales. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 0.9x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 7.0% (near the Quick-Service Restaurants median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Quick-Service Restaurants medians

How Gong cha Compares

Metric
Gong cha
Category median
vs median
Investment
$428K
$486Kmiddle half $342K–$748K · n=780
Below median, better than category
Revenue
$397K
$975Kmiddle half $664K–$1.4M · n=284
Below median, worse than category
Unit Count
38
18middle half 5–79 · n=755
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Quick-Service Restaurants brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units38Verified — printed on page 78 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
38
Opened
32
Last reporting year
Closed
0
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
N/A
Company-owned
2
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
86%
vs corporate-owned

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Transferred
11
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
18
0.47 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
12
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2023
0
Franchised units
2024
4+4
Franchised units
2025
36+32
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 20 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 20 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

198 current owners across 20 states.

  • CA 39
  • TX 36
  • NY 30
  • NJ 25
  • MA 22
  • FL 7
  • MD 7
  • GA 6
  • PA 6
  • VA 6
  • CT 3
  • RI 2
  • +8 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20; 2 entries carry no state. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

Total loans
15
Loan volume
$3.8M
Median loan
$251K
average
Charge-off rate
Limited · 15 loans
Limited SBA coverage: 15 loans, rate hidden until 10 have resolved and loans reach 2% of franchised units

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Limited · 15 loans
5-yr charge-off
0.0%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
12
Defaults
0

Vintage analysis

Gong cha charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Gong cha charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 6 vintages from 2018 to 2025. Rates range from 0.0% to 0.0%.0%5%10%'18'21'22'23'24'25

Top lenders financing Gong cha franchisees

The Huntington National Bank3 loans—
The Bank of Princeton2 loans0.0%
Patriot Bank, National Association1 loans0.0%

Showing 3 of 12 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Gong cha from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Top SBA lenders

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1The Huntington National Bank3$559KN/A
2The Bank of Princeton2$485K0.0%
3Patriot Bank, National Association1$330K0.0%
4PNC Bank, National Association1$265KN/A
5Firstrust Savings Bank1$380KN/A
6Newtek Bank, National Association1$175KN/A
7Provident Bank1$350KN/A
8The Middlefield Banking Company1$260KN/A
9FWBank1$564KN/A
10Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company1$112KN/A

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
TXTexas600.0%
NJNew Jersey300.0%
NYNew York300.0%
OHOhio10--
PAPennsylvania10--
TNTennessee10--

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offLimited · 15 loans
Verdict score51/100 (higher is better)
Litigation4 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

BAbove average51Verdict score 51/100

Gong Cha presents HIGH RISK due to a severely underdeveloped franchise system (6 units), active multi-state regulatory violations, master franchise disputes, and undisclosed profitability metrics.

Why this reads harsher than the B grade: the grade weighs financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency across the whole filing, while this summary lists individual flags without that weighting. The flags are worth checking with current owners; neither is investment advice.

High confidence±4 pts
4755

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

Four Item 3 matters, all involving franchise registration/disclosure violations by predecessor GCI (and in some cases the franchisor itself): (1) California DBO citation against GCI for offering an unregistered master franchise, settled via consent order (civil penalties of $2,500 x3); (2) civil suit/arbitration between GCI and its former CA master franchisee GCCA over renewal rights, settled with no monetary payment; (3) Maryland Securities Commissioner administrative proceeding against GCI, franchisor, and GCDMV for unregistered franchise sales, settled via consent order ($30,000 penalty plus $10,000 to GCDMV for rescinding licensees); (4) Virginia State Corporation Commission proceeding against GCI and franchisor for unregistered master franchise sale, settled with a $3,000 penalty.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Citrin Cooperman & Company, LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $4.9MYr 2: $4.1MNon-royalty: $1.5M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 51 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINOROnly 6 operating units indicates a micro-franchise system with minimal scale and unclear growth trajectory
  2. 02MINORMultiple regulatory violations across three states (CA, MD, VA) suggest systemic compliance and disclosure issues
  3. 03HIGHMaster franchise renewal dispute with court litigation and arbitration indicates franchisor-franchisee relationship deterioration and territorial instability

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 165 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 7.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training91 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory radius2 mi
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ5 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Termination groundsℹ15
Curable defaultsℹ2
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationMassachusetts
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawMassachusetts
Litigation count4
View Item 3 litigation summary

Four Item 3 matters, all involving franchise registration/disclosure violations by predecessor GCI (and in some cases the franchisor itself): (1) California DBO citation against GCI for offering an unregistered master franchise, settled via consent order (civil penalties of $2,500 x3); (2) civil suit/arbitration between GCI and its former CA master franchisee GCCA over renewal rights, settled with no monetary payment; (3) Maryland Securities Commissioner administrative proceeding against GCI, franchisor, and GCDMV for unregistered franchise sales, settled via consent order ($30,000 penalty plus $10,000 to GCDMV for rescinding licensees); (4) Virginia State Corporation Commission proceeding against GCI and franchisor for unregistered master franchise sale, settled with a $3,000 penalty.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
36 hrs
On-the-job training
55 hrs
Training location
"Certified" Gong cha training store(s) and/or other locations designated by franchisor
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
5 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
franchisee selects, franchisor approves
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
Designated third-party technology supplier (not named)
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: Designated third-party technology supplier (not named)

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

200 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 200 contacts · $49
Free preview
(281) 846-••••TX
Unlock all 200 contacts
469-709-••••TX
(973) 406-••••NJ
(617) 297-••••MA
508-873-••••MA

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Gong cha franchise?

The total investment to open a Gong cha franchise ranges from $207K – $648K, with an initial franchise fee of $35K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Gong cha franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Gong cha FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $397K. The median is $363K. Important context: Reported as net sales, not gross sales. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Gong cha?

Gong cha is franchised by Gong cha USA Franchising, LLC. Its parent company is Gong Cha Americas, Inc. (GCA). The ultimate parent named in the FDD is Gong Cha Limited (originally GC Group Topco Limited). Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Gong cha FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Gong cha FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Gong cha's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Gong cha (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Gong cha franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Gong cha has 38 total units in the United States, including 36 franchised units and 2 company-owned units. 32 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Gong cha a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Gong cha as a B-grade franchise with a verdict score of 51 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Gong cha, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Quick-Service Restaurants franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Quick-Service Restaurants category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.