Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Glass Doctor logo

Glass Doctor Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Home ServicesTexasFranchising since 1998
CAverageAverage40/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$157K – $327K
Disclosed sales
$970K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
32.8%
on 100 loans

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-01054FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent95%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Glass Doctor is a home- and auto-services franchise repairing and replacing auto glass, windows, shower enclosures, and flat glass. Franchisees run a service operation dispatching technicians for residential, commercial, and vehicle glass work in a territory.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Glass Doctor franchise requires a total initial investment of $157K – $327K, including a $60K franchise fee and an ongoing 4.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average unit revenue was $970K[2]. SBA 7(a) loans show a 32.8% charge-off rate across 100 loans[1]. FranchiseVerdict grade: C (Average), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✓ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$157K – $327K
62nd pct Home Services
Avg gross sales
$970K
15th pct Home Services
Royalty
4.0%
5th pct Home Services
Units
172
73rd pct Home Services
SBA charge-off
32.8%
% of SBA 7(a) loans not repaid · median varies by category

Quick verdict · Home Services · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$157K – $327K
Median $168K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$60K – $60K
Median $50K
above median ↑, worse than category
Liquid Capital Req'd
$37K – $79K
Median $29K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$970K
Median $587K
above median ↑, better than category
Royalty Rate
4.0%
Median 6.0%
below median ↓, better than category
Ongoing Fees
6.0% of rev
Median 8.0%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
32.8%
100 loans · Median 15.4%
above median ↑, worse than category
System Size
172 units
Median 47 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
2.9%
Median 4.3%
below median ↓, better than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
1 case
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Home Services median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $157K – $327K including a $60K franchise fee, 4.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage unit revenue of $970K/year (median $819K).
  • RISKVerdict C (Average), verdict score 40/100 (higher is better). SBA loan charge-off rate of 32.8% across 100 loans (well above the 16% franchise average, based on all SBA 7(a) franchise lending, 2010–2025).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +1 franchised outlets in the latest year (8 opened, 3 closed) (Item 20).
  • FLAGBankruptcy history disclosed in the FDD. Review Item 4 for details before proceeding.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Glass Doctor SPV LLC
Parent company
Neighborly Assetco LLC
FDD Item 1, page 11 of the 2026 FDD
Predecessor
Synergistic International LLC
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Chief Executive Officer
Michael Anthony Davis
Incorporated in
Delaware
HQ
1010 North University Parks Drive, Waco, Texas 76707
Auditor
Ernst & Young LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$353.9M
vs $321.2M prior year

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 11

17 other brands on this site name Neighborly Assetco LLC as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Portfolio: Neighborly

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2026 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Michael Anthony Davis
Headquarters
Texas
Founded
1998
FDD year
2026
States available
42

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 44% above the typical home services franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$157K – $327KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 41 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$59,900Verified — printed on page 24 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty4.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 28 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund2.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 28 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$37K – $79K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2026 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Glass Doctor: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$60K$60K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$37K$79K
Equipment, build-out, other$61K$188K
Total initial investment$157K$327K

Source: Glass Doctor 2026 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$157K – $327K
Middle of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$37K – $79K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$60K – $60K
Bottom third — review vs category
Royalty
4.0%
Tiered by sales volume · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
2.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
6.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Glass Doctor: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty4.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund2.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$160
Training fee$2K
Transfer fee$8K
Renewal fee$5K
Total fee load6.0% of rev
Fee structure insight

A 6.0% total fee load is unusually lean. More of each revenue dollar stays with the franchisee.

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 65% above the home services norm.

Avg gross sales$970KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 90 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$819KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 90 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typehistorical financial perfo…
Sample size112 outlets

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Glass Doctor until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$300K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Glass Doctor unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per unit, per yearFDD
FDD Item 19 reports $969,663 per unit
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $157K–$327K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $37K–$79K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$300K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Avg gross sales
$970K
Per unit/yr · from the Item 19 franchised-cohort breakdown (no single system-wide average disclosed)
Median gross sales
$819K

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
historical financial performance representation (Gross Sales by segment)
Sample size
112 outlets
vs category median 32 · large
Range (low → high)
$58K→$8.5MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 90 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Quartile band
$193K→$2.5M
Bottom 25% → top 25%
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
4 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · typical
Gross sales rank15th
Item 19 reporting methods vary across brands
Investment cost rank62th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank5th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank73th
vs Home Services peers
Risk score rank81th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 319 Home Services brands

Showing the headline figures — all 135 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →
Revenue insight

Revenue is 4.0x the investment midpoint. At typical franchise margins, this suggests a payback under 3 years.

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

Average unit generates $970K/year in gross sales. Median is $819K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Revenue-to-investment ratio: 4.0x.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 6.0% — below the Home Services median of 8.0%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 4/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 13.2% CAGR over 3 years across 172 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Home Services medians

How Glass Doctor Compares

Metric
Glass Doctor
Category median
vs median
Investment
$242K
$168Kmiddle half $122K–$232K · n=283
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$970K
$587Kmiddle half $376K–$1.3M · n=79
Above median, better than category
Unit Count
172
47middle half 14–137 · n=283
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Home Services brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units172Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 92 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
3-yr growth-2.6% (worth scrutinizing)
Turnover rate2.9% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
172
Opened
8
Last reporting year
Closed
3
Terminated
2
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
2
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
2.9%
Company-owned
0
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
1%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
-2.6%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+13.2%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
2
Not renewed
2
Transferred
7
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Projected new
9
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2023
165
Franchised units
2024
171+6
Franchised units
2025
172+1
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 40 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 40 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

180 current owners across 40 states; 11 former (terminated, transferred or not renewed) listed separately.

  • TX 27
  • FL 15
  • CO 9
  • SC 8
  • CA 7
  • NC 7
  • NY 7
  • VA 7
  • IN 6
  • MS 6
  • NJ 6
  • PA 6
  • +28 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

F
SBA Lending Health
Weak SBA lending record · 32.8% charge-off
Total loans
100
Loan volume
$21.5M
Median loan
$150K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
32.8%
on 100 loans · rates vary by category · see methodology

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
67.2%
5-yr charge-off
33.3%
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
50
Defaults
20
Typical loan rate
8.1%
avg rate to borrowers
Franchised industry avg
23.5%
brand above franchise avg ↑
Jobs supported
650
3.0 per loan
Lender concentration
22%
top lender's share

Borrower mix: 72% went to startups / new businesses, 28% to established operators

Franchise vs independent — in automotive glass replacement shops, franchised businesses charge off at 23.5% vs 20.5% for independents — franchising is associated with 15% higher SBA default risk in this category.

Vintage analysis

Glass Doctor charge-off rate by loan vintage

BrandNational avg
Glass Doctor charge-off rate by loan vintage. Showing 8 vintages from 2004 to 2020. Rates range from 0.0% to 100.0%.0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%100%'04'07'15'19'20

Top lenders financing Glass Doctor franchisees

United Midwest Savings Bank National Association22 loans66.7%
Wells Fargo Bank National Association5 loans40.0%
Stearns Bank National Association4 loans50.0%

Showing 3 of 50 lenders. The full breakdown — every lender, state distribution, interest rates & risk ratings — is in the SBA Lending Report below.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Total loans
9
Loan volume
$2.0M
Charge-off rate
N/A
Jobs created
51

Historical SBA 504 lending data via CDCs, not predictive of future performance.

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

Lender network · 7(a) + 504

SBA Lending Report

Full lending analysis for Glass Doctor from SBA 7(a) FOIA data.

Principal loss rate
10.0%
Avg SBA guarantee
75%
Avg interest rate
8.06%
Avg chargeoff amount
$107K
Lender concentration
22.0%
Job velocity
3.0 per $100K
Startup risk premium
+2.9pp
NAICS benchmark
22.7%
NAICS 811122
Jobs supported
650

Top SBA lendersTop lender holds 22% of loans

#LenderLoansVolumeDefault %
1United Midwest Savings Bank National Association22$3.4M66.7%
2Wells Fargo Bank National Association5$733K40.0%
3Stearns Bank National Association4$467K50.0%
4TD Bank, National Association4$2.0M100.0%
5The Huntington National Bank4$681KN/A
6PNC Bank, National Association3$807K33.3%
7Trustmark Bank3$209K66.7%
8Byline Bank3$1.5MN/A
9Bank of Ann Arbor2$200K0.0%
10First International Bank & Trust2$284K0.0%

Geographic failure vector

StateLoansDefaultsRate
TXTexas13583.3%
VAVirginia13457.1%
FLFlorida7350.0%
CACalifornia6266.7%
COColorado400.0%
KYKentucky400.0%
MSMississippi4266.7%
PAPennsylvania4133.3%
SCSouth Carolina4150.0%
WIWisconsin400.0%

SBA 7(a) lending trend

1994
1
1996
1
2000
2
2002
1
2003
1
2004
10
2005
5
2006
2
2007
4
2008
1
2009
2
2010
4
2013
1
2015
4
2016
3
2017
4
2018
8
2019
6
2020
5
2021
7
2022
3
2023
8
2024
10
2025
5
2026
2

Borrower profile

Startup31 (58%)
Existing (2+ yr)8 (15%)
New (< 2 yr)7 (13%)
Ownership change6 (11%)
Unanswered1 (2%)

Source: SBA 7(a) + 504 FOIA loan-level data, matched by FranchiseVerdict

Lending insight

A 32.8% charge-off rate means roughly 1 in 3 franchisees failed to repay their SBA loan. Investigate what changed.

What could kill this investment?

SBA loans charge off at 32.8% — 105% above the 16.0% national norm, i.e. higher lender-observed risk.

SBA charge-off32.8% · 100 loans
Verdict score40/100 (higher is better)
Litigation1 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

CAverage40Verdict score 40/100

Glass Doctor presents moderate-to-cautionary risk: minimal system growth, hidden profitability metrics, prior litigation over territory claims, and high front-loaded costs in a mature market with unclear earnings visibility.

High confidence±4 pts
3644

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

Glass Doctor SPV LLC sued former franchisee MotiveNation Incorporated and its owners for breach of contract/breach of guaranty after the franchisee allegedly stopped paying and abandoned the business; defendants filed counterclaims alleging FTC Act and Texas DTPA violations, fraud, and misrepresentation regarding franchise profitability. Trial set for May 18, 2026.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

Subject: the company or an affiliate. Disclosed (Item 4 covers the last 10 years)

Disclosed bankruptcies involve portfolio companies controlled by KKR (an indirect owner) and not the Franchisor itself: Marelli Holdings Co. Ltd., The Collected Group LLC, Envision Healthcare Corporation, Genesis Care Pty Limited, IPI Legacy Liquidation Co., and Café Coffee Day

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Ernst & Young LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $353.9MYr 2: $321.2MTotal: $480.8MNon-royalty: $126.9M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 40 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORStagnant unit growth (1.9% YoY) suggests market saturation or franchisee struggles in a mature 165-unit system
  2. 02HIGHLitigation history includes territory/licensing misrepresentation settlement ($125,000) and affiliate regulatory violations indicating compliance issues within parent company ecosystem
  3. 03MEDRoyalty range (4-7%) is moderate-to-high against undisclosed profitability; unclear what drives variance or triggers upper tier
  4. 04MEDHigh franchise fee ($59,900) represents 39-59% of minimum investment, leaving limited working capital for a service-based business requiring equipment/inventory

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 135 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 6.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training33 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population300,000
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ25 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationNo
Arbitration locationMcLennan County, Texas
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawTexas
Litigation count1
View Item 3 litigation summary

Glass Doctor SPV LLC sued former franchisee MotiveNation Incorporated and its owners for breach of contract/breach of guaranty after the franchisee allegedly stopped paying and abandoned the business; defendants filed counterclaims alleging FTC Act and Texas DTPA violations, fraud, and misrepresentation regarding franchise profitability. Trial set for May 18, 2026.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
28 hrs
On-the-job training
8 hrs
Training location
Waco, Texas (or virtual) plus field/mentorship training at a designated franchisee location
Ongoing training
Required
Field support
40 hrs/yr
On-site visits per year
Time to open
6 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisor provides site selection guidelines and general specifications and standards
Franchisor financing
Offered
Item 10
POS system
ServiceTitan
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✓Site selection assistance
✗Grand opening support
✓Lease negotiation help

Technology: ServiceTitan

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

191 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 191 contacts · $49
Free preview
318-460-••••LA
Unlock all 191 contacts
(262) 346-••••WI
864-614-••••SC
850-785-••••FL
972-271-••••TX

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Glass Doctor franchise?

The total investment to open a Glass Doctor franchise ranges from $157K – $327K, with an initial franchise fee of $60K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Glass Doctor franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Glass Doctor FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $970K. The median is $819K. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Glass Doctor?

Glass Doctor is franchised by Glass Doctor SPV LLC. Its parent company is Neighborly Assetco LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Glass Doctor FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Glass Doctor FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Glass Doctor's franchise failure rate?

Based on SBA 7(a) loan data, Glass Doctor has a charge-off rate of 32.8% across 100 loans, meaning 32.8% of franchise loans were charged off. Charge-off rates are one proxy for franchise risk, though they do not capture all closures. This data comes from FOIA-sourced SBA lending records.

How many Glass Doctor franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Glass Doctor has 172 total units in the United States, including 172 franchised units and 0 company-owned units. 8 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Glass Doctor a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Glass Doctor as a C-grade franchise with a verdict score of 40 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Glass Doctor, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Home Services franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Home Services category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.