Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Bumble Roofing logo

Bumble Roofing Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Home ServicesVAFranchising since 2023
AStrongest tierStrongest tier78/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$175K – $300K
Disclosed sales
$770K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Under 10 loans (2)

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00419FDD 2026Data QualityExcellent91%
Manager-run OKYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing + SBA 7(a) records

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Bumble Roofing is a residential and commercial roofing franchise handling repairs, replacements, and inspections. Franchisees run local operations, managing crews, estimates, and project delivery within a protected territory.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Bumble Roofing franchise requires a total initial investment of $175K – $300K, including a $50K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.5% royalty[2]. Per the 2026 FDD, average revenue per franchisee was $770K. This franchisor reports Item 19 per franchisee rather than per outlet, so the figure is not comparable with per-outlet averages[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: low - issued within the last 12 months

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored8 of 8 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$175K – $300K
72nd pct Home Services
Avg gross sales
$770K
Per franchisee, not per outletOutlet subset
Royalty
6.5%
44th pct Home Services
Units
67
51st pct Home Services
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Home Services · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$175K – $300K
Median $168K
above median ↑, worse than category
Franchise Fee
$50K – $50K
Median $50K
near median
Liquid Capital Req'd
$55K – $55K
Median $29K
above median ↑, worse than category
Avg Revenue
$770K
Median $587K
Per franchisee, not per outletOutlet subset
Royalty Rate
6.5%
Median 6.0%
near median
Ongoing Fees
7.5% of rev
Median 8.0%
near median
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Under 10 loans (2)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 2 loans, rate hidden below 10
System Size
67 units
Median 47 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
10.4%
Median 4.3%
above median ↑, worse than category
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Optional
Can hire a manager
Litigation
1 case
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Home Services median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $175K – $300K including a $50K franchise fee, 6.5% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage revenue per franchisee of $770K/year (median $532K) (reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system). Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures.
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 78/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +11 franchised outlets in the latest year (18 opened, 7 closed); 1 signed but not yet open (Item 20).
  • FLAG7 units terminated last reporting year (10.4% of the system). Ask existing franchisees why.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Bumble Roofing Franchisor, LLC
Parent company
Outdoor Living Brands Holdco, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2026 FDD
Ultimate parent
Empower Brands Franchising, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 8 of the 2026 FDD
Predecessor
La Roofing & Builder Group Inc. d/b/a Bumble Roofing
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
Contact (Item 19)
Scott Zide
Incorporated in
DE
HQ
2426 Old Brick Road, Glen Allen, VA 23060
Auditor
Smith + Howard
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$96.8M
vs $102.2M prior year

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 8

10 other brands on this site name Empower Brands Franchising, LLC as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Portfolio: Empower Brands

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2026 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Scott Zide
Headquarters
VA
Founded
2023
FDD year
2026
States available
15

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 41% above the typical home services franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$175K – $300KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 25 of the 2026 FDD (Item 7). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$49,500Verified — printed on page 17 of the 2026 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.5%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 20 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund1.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 20 of the 2026 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$55K – $55K

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2026 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Bumble Roofing: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$50K$50K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$55K$55K
Equipment, build-out, other$70K$196K
Total initial investment$175K$300K

Source: Bumble Roofing 2026 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$175K – $300K
Bottom third — review vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$55K – $55K
Bottom third — review vs category
Franchise fee
$50K – $50K
Middle of category vs category
Royalty
6.5%
Tiered by sales volume · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
1.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
7.5%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Bumble Roofing: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.5% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund1.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$345
Training fee$250
Transfer fee$10K
Renewal fee$5K
Total fee load7.5% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales run 31% above the home services norm.

Avg gross sales$770K

Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 47 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross sales$532KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 47 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Item 19 typegross sales and revenue wi…
Sample size8 franchisees

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Bumble Roofing until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$293K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Bumble Roofing unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per franchisee, per year (NOT per outlet)FDD
FDD Item 19 reports $770,182 per franchisee — not per outlet. Every other input below is for ONE unit; replace this with a single-unit figure before relying on the ROIC. — Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Adjust to a franchisee figure before relying on this.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $175K–$300K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $55K–$55K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$293K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2026 FDD

Financial Performance

Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Avg gross sales
$770K
Per franchisee, per year — not per outlet
Median gross sales
$532K
Per franchisee, not per outlet

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales and revenue with expenses
Sample size
8 franchisees
vs category median 32 · small
Range (low → high)
$94K→$1.5MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 47 of the 2026 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2025
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2026
Disclosed in the 2026 filing, covering 2025
Transparency
7 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank72th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank44th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank51th
vs Home Services peers
Risk score rank13th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 319 Home Services brands

Showing the headline figures — all 152 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

The average franchisee generates $770K/year in gross sales. Median is $532K — top performers pull the average up, so a typical unit earns less. Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 7.5% (near the Home Services median).

Disclosure

Transparency score 7/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

Net unit growth of +21.2% over 3 years (18 opened, 7 closed).

Multi-unit rate

Only 1% of franchisees own multiple units. Could indicate challenging economics or a young system where operators haven't had time to expand.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Home Services medians

How Bumble Roofing Compares

Metric
Bumble Roofing
Category median
vs median
Investment
$238K
$168Kmiddle half $122K–$232K · n=283
Above median, worse than category
Revenue
$770K
$587Kmiddle half $376K–$1.3M · n=79
Not compared

Per franchisee, not per outlet - the category median is per-outlet only, so no comparison is shown

Unit Count
67
47middle half 14–137 · n=283
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Home Services brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units67Verified — printed on page 52 of the 2026 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it two ways.
3-yr growth+21.2% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate10.4% (caution)

Source: FDD 2026 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
67
Opened
18
Last reporting year
Closed
7
Terminated
7
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
10.4%
Company-owned
4
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
94%
vs corporate-owned
Multi-unit owners
1.0%
Net growth (3-yr)
+21.2%
Net unit change over 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
7
Not renewed
0
Transferred
0
Reacquired
0
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
1
0.01 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
0
Franchisor's next-year forecast
2023
0
Franchised units
2024
52+52
Franchised units
2025
63+11
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 20 · 17 states with active franchisees

The Territory Map

Derived from franchisee contact records. Shows states with at least one current operator. Not where the franchisor is registered to sell new units (that data is re-extracting in a future refresh).

AK
ME
VT
NH
MA
RI
CT
NY
NJ
PA
DE
MD
DC
WA
OR
CA
NV
ID
MT
WY
UT
CO
AZ
NM
ND
SD
NE
KS
OK
TX
MN
IA
MO
AR
LA
WI
IL
MS
TN
MI
IN
KY
AL
OH
WV
GA
VA
NC
SC
FL
HI
Active operators · 17 states
No contacts on file

States derived from franchisee contact records (FDD Item 20). Shows states with at least one current operator on file. Full state registration data (Item 12) will appear on a future FDD refresh.

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

25 current owners across 17 states.

  • TX 4
  • CA 2
  • FL 2
  • NJ 2
  • NY 2
  • VA 2
  • AL 1
  • CO 1
  • CT 1
  • GA 1
  • ID 1
  • IN 1
  • +5 more states

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

Growth insight

Fast growth in a small system. Newer franchisors expanding quickly may not yet have the support infrastructure of larger systems.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA loan disclosures. This brand has only 2 7(a) loans on file; statistical reliability is limited below 10 loans.

Total loans
2
Loan volume
$300K
Median loan
$150K
50th percentile
Charge-off rate
Under 10 loans (2)
Insufficient SBA coverage: 2 loans, rate hidden below 10

Historical SBA 7(a) lending data, not predictive of future performance. How SBA charge-off rates are calculated

Repayment rate (PIF)
Under 10 loans (2)
5-yr charge-off
Under 10 loans (2)
Loans approved 2021+
Active lenders
1
Defaults
N/A

Explore lender portfolios on Bank Reports or regional data on State Reports.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offUnder 10 loans (2)
Verdict score78/100 (higher is better)
Litigation1 cases
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier78Verdict score 78/100
Moderate confidence±10 pts
6888

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: the franchisor is a named party (defendant).

Endurance Brands Roofing, LLC v. Bumble Roofing Franchisor, LLC (AAA Case 01-25-0000-3477, filed Oct 14, 2025): former franchisee alleging breach of contract, fraud, and franchise law violations related to alleged misrepresentations about training/support. Franchisee terminated Oct 7, 2025. Bumble Roofing filed counterclaim and third-party claims for unpaid fees and liquidated damages. No hearing date set.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · Smith + Howard

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $96.8MYr 2: $102.2MNon-royalty: $9.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

Financials are the audited consolidated statements of Outdoor Living Brands Holdco, LLC (the franchisor's guarantor/affiliate), fiscal years ended September 30, 2025, 2024, and 2023. The franchisor Bumble Roofing Franchisor, LLC does not have standalone audited statements; OLB Holdco unconditionally guarantees franchisor obligations. FY2025 total revenue was $96,780,084 (down from $102,246,523 in FY2024). Revenue includes fencing/rail, franchise royalties and fees, product sales, roofing, window/door, franchise fees, ancillary, and advertising fund contributions across all Empower/Outdoor Living brands.

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: Yes
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: Yes
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 78 / 100 verdict

  1. 01HIGHActive litigation with fraud allegations and franchise law violations filed by former franchisee in October 2025
  2. 02MEDNet income not disclosed despite $770k average revenue — inability or unwillingness to provide Item 19 financial performance represents major transparency gap
  3. 03MED6.5% royalty on $770k average revenue yields ~$50k annual royalty payment, consuming significant portion of undisclosed net profits
  4. 04MINORHigh initial investment ($174,998–$300,334) combined with franchise fee ($49,500) totals up to $350k+ with unproven ROI

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 152 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 7.5% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term7 yrs
Renewal term7 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training64 hrs

Source: FDD 2026 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term7 years
Renewal term7 years
Allowed renewalsℹ1
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population100,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorOptional
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ10 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationVirginia
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawVA
Litigation count1
View Item 3 litigation summary

Endurance Brands Roofing, LLC v. Bumble Roofing Franchisor, LLC (AAA Case 01-25-0000-3477, filed Oct 14, 2025): former franchisee alleging breach of contract, fraud, and franchise law violations related to alleged misrepresentations about training/support. Franchisee terminated Oct 7, 2025. Bumble Roofing filed counterclaim and third-party claims for unpaid fees and liquidated damages. No hearing date set.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
64 hrs
On-the-job training
0 hrs
Training location
California, Virginia, or another location franchisor designates
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
2 mo
From signing to launch
Site selection
Franchisee selects (lease space or home office with dedicated office space)
Franchisor financing
Offered
Item 10
POS system
QuickBooks Online
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: QuickBooks Online

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

25 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 25 contacts · $49
Free preview
(804) 353-••••VA
Unlock all 25 contacts
(908) 970-••••NJ
(575) 640-••••NM
(904) 463-••••FL
(512) 586-••••TX

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Bumble Roofing franchise?

The total investment to open a Bumble Roofing franchise ranges from $175K – $300K, with an initial franchise fee of $50K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Bumble Roofing franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Bumble Roofing FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $770K. The median is $532K. Important context: Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures; Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Bumble Roofing?

Bumble Roofing is franchised by Bumble Roofing Franchisor, LLC. Its parent company is Outdoor Living Brands Holdco, LLC. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is Empower Brands Franchising, LLC. Source: FDD Item 1, 2026 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Bumble Roofing FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Bumble Roofing FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Bumble Roofing's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Bumble Roofing (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Bumble Roofing franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Bumble Roofing has 67 total units in the United States, including 63 franchised units and 4 company-owned units. 18 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Bumble Roofing a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Bumble Roofing as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 78 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Bumble Roofing, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Home Services franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Home Services category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.