Skip to main content
FranchiseVerdict
Fitness Machine Technicians FMT logo

Fitness Machine Technicians FMT Franchise Cost, Revenue & Review 2026

Health & FitnessNCFranchising since 2023
AStrongest tierStrongest tier73/100Editorial grade from public filings; not investment advice.
Investment
$66K – $128K
Disclosed sales
$467K
gross sales, not profit
SBA charge-off
Not SBA-matched

Investment, fees, disclosed sales, units, SBA record and risk, as one PDF. Free; no spam; one click to unsubscribe.

FV-00949FDD 2025Data QualityExcellent91%
Owner-operator requiredYes: Protected territory

Data from FDD filing

Analysis by FranchiseVerdict Research · Methodology

Fitness Machine Technicians is a B2B franchise providing repair and preventive maintenance for exercise equipment at gyms, studios, and home users. Franchisees run a mobile service operation dispatching technicians for repair calls in a territory.

FranchiseVerdict summary · 2026

A Fitness Machine Technicians FMT franchise requires a total initial investment of $66K – $128K, including a $45K franchise fee and an ongoing 6.0% royalty[2]. Per the 2025 FDD, average revenue per franchisee was $467K. This franchisor reports Item 19 per franchisee rather than per outlet, so the figure is not comparable with per-outlet averages[2]. FranchiseVerdict grade: A (Strongest tier), an editorial assessment, not investment advice. Run a live ROI scan →

Sources, dates and evidence

FDD issued: · Data extracted: · Last cited check: · Staleness risk: medium - issued 12 to 24 months ago; a newer filing is likely on file

Evidence: strong✓ Investment (Item 7)✓ Item 19 status✓ Units and owners (Item 20)✗ SBA loan coverage✓ Litigation (Item 3)✓ Financial statements (Item 21)✓ Franchisor identityhow this is scored7 of 7 headline figures on this page cite a page of the filing.

Overview

Investment
$66K – $128K
9th pct Health & Fitn…
Avg gross sales
$467K
Per franchisee, not per outletOutlet subset
Royalty
6.0%
13th pct Health & Fitn…
Units
140
81st pct Health & Fitn…
SBA charge-off
N/A

Quick verdict · Health & Fitness · color = vs category peers

Total Investment
$66K – $128K
Median $392K
below median ↓, better than category
Franchise Fee
$45K – $45K
Median $50K
near median
Liquid Capital Req'd
$15K – $25K
Median $35K
below median ↓, better than category
Avg Revenue
$467K
Median $477K
Per franchisee, not per outletOutlet subset
Royalty Rate
6.0%
Median 7.0%
below median ↓, better than category
Ongoing Fees
7.0% of rev
Median 9.0%
below median ↓, better than category
SBA Charge-Off Rate
Not SBA-matched
Not matched to SBA 7(a) loans
System Size
140 units
Median 17 units
above median ↑, better than category
Turnover Rate
4.3%
Median 0.0%
Territory
Protected, not exclusive
Limits on the franchisor opening nearby; not an exclusive zone
Owner-Operator
Required
You must run it yourself
Litigation
5 cases
Some history

Green = favorable by >10% vs Health & Fitness median · No shading = within ±10% · Red = unfavorable by >10% · Source: FDD filings + SBA 7(a)

Data from public FDD filings and SBA records. Not financial advice. Methodology

Bottom line

  • COSTTotal investment $66K – $128K including a $45K franchise fee, 6.0% ongoing royalty.
  • RETURNSAverage revenue per franchisee of $467K/year (reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system). Note: this is gross profit, not take-home income. Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures.
  • RISKVerdict A (Strongest tier), verdict score 73/100 (higher is better).
  • GROWTHPositive: net +11 franchised outlets in the latest year (17 opened, 6 closed) (Item 20).
  • GROWTHSystem growing at 28.2% CAGR over 3 years with 140 total units. Strong expansion trajectory.

Item 1 · who you're contracting with

The Franchisor

Corporate structure & franchisor financials
Legal entity
Main Line Brands LLC
Parent company
Main Line Brands Holdings, LLC
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2025 FDD
Ultimate parent
Susquehanna Private Capital Fund II, LLP
FDD Item 1, page 9 of the 2025 FDD
Predecessor
Proexco, LLC
Prior franchisor entity
CEO title
President
Jason Pritchard
CEO experience
12 yrs
Years in role or industry
Incorporated in
DE
HQ
2359 Perimeter Pointe Parkway, Suite 250, Charlotte, NC 28208
Auditor
GreerWalker LLP
Audited financials
Franchisor revenue
$11.6M
vs $11.3M prior year
Management churn noted
Frequent turnover
Item 2 disclosed frequent executive changes

Same owner · FDD Item 1, page 9

2 other brands on this site name Susquehanna Private Capital Fund II, LLP as parent or ultimate parent in their own FDD.

Grouped by the owner's name as each filing prints it (this page: the 2025 FDD). Spelling variants of the same group may be listed apart; a brand is never grouped with an owner its filing does not name.

Overview

About

CEO
Jason Pritchard
Headquarters
NC
Founded
2020
FDD year
2025
States available
33

Can you afford it, and what does the money buy?

Entry cost runs 75% below the typical health & fitness franchise.

Total investment (Item 7)$66K – $128KCited, not corroborated — printed on page 21 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Franchise fee$45,000Verified — printed on page 13 of the 2025 FDD (Item 5), and another item of the same filing prints the same figure on a labelled row, which is an independent restatement.
Royalty6.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 15 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Ad fund1.0%Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 15 of the 2025 FDD (Item 6). Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Working capital$15K – $25K

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 5–7

FDD Item 7 · 2025 filing

Initial investment breakdown

Fitness Machine Technicians FMT: Item 7 initial investment breakdown
Cost componentLowHigh
Initial franchise fee$45K$45K
Working capital (3–6 mo)$15K$25K
Equipment, build-out, other$6K$58K
Total initial investment$66K$128K

Source: Fitness Machine Technicians FMT 2025 FDD, Items 5 and 7[2]. “Equipment, build-out, other” is computed as total minus disclosed line items above.

Item 7 · what it costs to open + operate

The Vitals

Total investment
$66K – $128K
Top 40% of category vs category
Liquid capital req'd
$15K – $25K
Top 40% of category vs category
Franchise fee
$45K – $45K
Top 40% of category vs category
Royalty
6.0%
Tiered by sales volume · typical 6–8%
Ad fund
1.0%
typical 3–5%
Total fee load
7.0%
vs 9–13% typical

Ongoing fees · Item 6

Fitness Machine Technicians FMT: Item 6 recurring fees
FeeAmount
Royalty6.0% of gross sales
Marketing / ad fund1.0% of gross sales
Technology fee$175
Transfer fee$8K
Renewal fee$4K
Inventory (initial)$0 – $3K
Total fee load7.0% of rev

What do units actually make?

Average unit sales land near the health & fitness norm.

Avg gross sales$467K

Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Cited, not corroborated — printed on page 46 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Median gross salesNot extracted
Item 19 typegross sales
Sample size36 franchisees

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 19

Single-unit · not modelled

Returns at a glance

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit, and the operating costs that turn one into the other are in no filing. We publish no modelled return for Fitness Machine Technicians FMT until someone supplies them — yours, in the models below.

—

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

Total invested capital · disclosed

$117K

Item 7 initial investment plus working capital, as filed — the one figure here that needs no assumption.

ROI & LBO modelsSingle-unit · 25-unit portfolio · editable
Blue values = direct from FDD (Item 7 investment, Item 19 revenue, Item 6 fees)Not set = no filing supplies it and we will not substitute one. Enter your own

What one unit earns on your invested capital

Model A · Single-Unit Return

Computes unlevered return on invested capital (ROIC) for a single franchise unit, read against the 30–60% reference band · Yale SOM, Post-MBA Path Exhibit 2 (2023). Below that band a passive index fund likely outperforms; above it the franchisor has pricing power you're subsidizing.

Note: Item 19 revenue is what the franchisor discloses, and it is the top line only — gross sales are not profit. No FDD discloses the operating costs that turn one into the other, so those fields start empty and nothing is modelled until you supply them from your own lease quote, labor market and build-out budget.

Returns model · single-unit ROIC

What would one Fitness Machine Technicians FMT unit return on the cash you put in?

From FDDNot set — you supply itYou overrode an FDD value
Revenue · per franchisee, per year (NOT per outlet)FDD
FDD Item 19 reports $466,910 per franchisee — not per outlet. Every other input below is for ONE unit; replace this with a single-unit figure before relying on the ROIC. — Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Adjust to a franchisee figure before relying on this.
Franchisor take · royalty + ad fundFDD
typ 6–8%
typ 3–5%
Operating costs · not in any FDDnot set

Illustrative category typicals — not sourced to any filing, survey or sample. Replace them with figures from franchisee validation calls before you rely on the output.

Total invested capital · what you put in to openFDD
FDD Item 7: $66K–$128K (midpoint used)
FDD reports $15K–$25K

Unlevered ROIC · per unit

Your modelled return on total invested capital, before any debt financing.

—

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.


Store EBITDA · annual
—
EBITDA margin
—
Total invested
$117K
Payback
—
Single-unit only. A multi-unit portfolio gives up roughly 5–15% of this to shared services (corporate G&A) before reaching the ~10-unit break-even point.

What 25 units return when you use SBA financing

Model B · Return on Equity: Debt-Financed Acquisition

Models a 25-unit portfolio acquisition financed with an SBA 7(a) loan. Shows equity IRR (your return on cash invested), DSCR (how safely the cash flow covers debt service), and the capital stack (SBA + seller + equity breakdown).

This is the “search fund” or “entrepreneurship through acquisition” scenario: you buy an existing multi-unit operator, use leverage to amplify returns, and either operate or hire management. The 25-unit size is the typical minimum for an SBA-backed franchise portfolio acquisition to pencil as a full-time income.

What “return on equity” means here: if you put in $500K of your own cash and the business generates enough EBITDA to pay down debt and grow, your equity IRR is the annual return on that $500K, including the value created when you eventually sell. Target IRR for a search fund is typically 25–35%.

Not modelled yet

An FDD discloses gross sales, not profit. We hold no sourced figure for COGS, labour, rent / occupancy and other operating costs, and will not substitute an assumed one. Enter your own and the model runs on your assumptions.

A 25-unit return is built on a per-unit EBITDA. Fill in the operating costs in Model A above and this model runs on that figure, or take the whole scenario to the full ROI workbench, where the portfolio and LBO models accept your own per-unit economics directly.

These models are for research and scenario planning only. Not investment advice. Actual results depend on your specific location, management, and market conditions. Consult a franchise attorney and accountant before signing any franchise agreement.

Item 19 · Source: 2025 FDD

Financial Performance

Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures

Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system

Avg gross sales
$467K
Per franchisee, per year — not per outlet

Gross sales are revenue before expenses — not profit. Actual owner earnings depend on rent, labor, royalties, marketing fees, and debt service.

Item 19 type
gross sales
Sample size
36 franchisees
vs category median 11 · large
Range (low → high)
$40K→$1.5MCited, not corroborated — printed on page 49 of the 2025 FDD. Nothing else in our record independently restates or re-derives it.
Cohort dispersion (min → max)
Reporting year
2024
Fiscal year the figures cover
Source filing
FDD 2025
Disclosed in the 2025 filing, covering 2024
Transparency
8 / 10
vs category median 4 / 10 · above
Gross sales rank
No comparison data
Investment cost rank9th
Lower investment ranks lower (better)
Royalty rate rank13th
Lower royalty = lower percentile (better)
Unit count rank81th
vs Health & Fitness peers
Risk score rank7th
Lower risk = lower percentile (better)

Compared against 173 Health & Fitness brands

Showing the headline figures — all 153 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Operator outlook

What the numbers say

Data-driven interpretation of this brand's financial disclosures, fee structure, and system trajectory.

Unit economics

The average franchisee generates $467K/year in gross sales. Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system.

Fee burden

Total ongoing fee load of 7.0% — below the Health & Fitness median of 9.0%.

Disclosure

Transparency score 8/10 — this franchisor discloses detailed breakdowns (quartiles, segments, or cohort data). Buyers can model unit economics with higher confidence.

Operator retention

System expanding at 28.2% CAGR over 3 years across 140 units — operators are staying and new ones are joining.

Source: FDD Item 19 financial performance representations and publicly filed FDD data. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Verify all figures with the franchisor and current franchisees before making any investment decision.

vs Health & Fitness medians

How Fitness Machine Technicians FMT Compares

Metric
Fitness Machine Technicians FMT
Category median
vs median
Investment
$97K
$392Kmiddle half $226K–$620K · n=172
Below median, better than category
Revenue
$467K
$477Kmiddle half $316K–$739K · n=65
Not compared

Per franchisee, not per outlet - the category median is per-outlet only, so no comparison is shown

Unit Count
140
17middle half 5–70 · n=171
Above median, better than category

Category median of published Health & Fitness brands that report the figure; the middle half spans the 25th to 75th percentile and n counts the brands behind it. Medians are used because a few very large systems pull an average far from the typical brand. Revenue is disclosed gross sales, not profit.

Is the system healthy?

Total units140Verified — printed on page 50 of the 2025 FDD (Item 20), and the table's own arithmetic closes on it three ways.
3-yr growth+28.2% (favorable vs category)
Turnover rate4.3% (favorable vs category)

Source: FDD 2025 · Item 20

Unit growth

Item 20 · unit dynamics

The Growth Chart

Total units
140
Opened
17
Last reporting year
Closed
6
Terminated
0
Franchisor ended the franchise (per Item 20)
Non-renewed
0
Term expired, not renewed (per Item 20)
Turnover rate
4.3%
Company-owned
8
Corporate units in the system
% franchised
94%
vs corporate-owned
Net growth (3-yr)
+28.2%
Net unit change over 3 years
3-yr CAGR
+28.2%
Compounded over last 3 years

Last fiscal year · Item 20 exits and transfers

Terminated
0
Not renewed
0
Reacquired
6
Franchisor bought back
Signed, not yet open
0
0.00 per open outlet · Item 20 Table 5
Projected new
8
Franchisor's next-year forecast
Transfer rate
10.0%
Owners selling to other franchisees
Ceased ops
4.3%
Units that stopped operating
2022
103
Franchised units
2023
121+18
Franchised units
2024
132+11
Franchised units

Year-over-year franchised unit counts and net change. Source: FDD Item 20.

Item 12 · 33 states reported

The Territory Map

FDD Item 12 reports the state count, but the specific list isn't in our current data. The map will appear once we re-extract from the FDD or enough franchisee contacts are available.

33

states with franchisees (per FDD Item 12)

Where the owners are · Item 20 owner list

1 current owner across 1 state.

  • CA 1

Counts only, from the list the franchisor prints in Item 20. Names and phone numbers are for your own due diligence and are not shown here.

SBA loan performance

Government records

SBA Loan Data

Aggregated from SBA 7(a) and 504 loan disclosures, public data unique to FranchiseVerdict.

No SBA loan data available for this brand.

What could kill this investment?

SBA charge-offNot SBA-matched
Verdict score73/100 (higher is better)
Litigation5 cases · none name the franchisor
Auditor going-concern doubtNo (favorable vs category)

Source: SBA 7(a) FOIA · FDD Items 3, 21

Risk analysis

FranchiseVerdict rating + FDD Items 3, 4, 8, 16, 21

Risk & Legal

AStrongest tier73Verdict score 73/100

Moderate-to-high risk opportunity with regulatory compliance concerns at parent level, unverified financial claims, slow unit growth, and service-model labor dependency.

Why this reads harsher than the A grade: the grade weighs financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency across the whole filing, while this summary lists individual flags without that weighting. The flags are worth checking with current owners; neither is investment advice.

Moderate confidence±13 pts
6086

Litigation (Item 3)

Subject: officers or affiliates. The franchisor is not a named party in these cases.

5 predecessor/affiliate matters: 4 regulatory consent orders against TMA Franchise Systems (predecessor to Mosquito Authority) for franchise registration violations in Maryland (2013), Rhode Island (2013), Virginia (2015), and Minnesota (2017); plus 1 Soccer Shots affiliate assurance of discontinuance re no-poaching provisions (2019). No pending litigation for current franchisor.

Bankruptcy (Item 4)

None disclosed

Audited financials (Item 21)

Yes · GreerWalker LLP

Franchisor revenue (Item 21)

Yr 1: $11.6MYr 2: $11.3MNon-royalty: $1.0M

Franchisor entity revenue (not unit-level)

ⓘ These are the parent company's consolidated financials (the parent guarantees the franchisor), not this brand's standalone results — the figure reflects the whole corporate group, not this brand alone.

Supplier relationship · Items 8 & 16

  • Franchisor sells you products: No
  • Kickbacks from required suppliers: No
  • Must buy proprietary products: Yes
  • Restricted to system-approved products: Yes
  • Can negotiate own supplier terms: No

Score breakdown · what drove the 73 / 100 verdict

  1. 01MINORPredecessor company (TMA/Mosquito Authority) has four unregistered franchise sales regulatory violations across multiple states, indicating potential compliance and disclosure issues that may persist
  2. 02MEDModest unit growth of only 9.1% YoY with 140 total units suggests limited brand momentum; saturation risk in service territory model
  3. 03MINORTiered royalty structure (6% then 5%) creates ambiguity on true take-home net income once corporate overhead is factored across declining margin tiers
  4. 04MINORAffiliate litigation (Soccer Shots no-poaching settlement) indicates corporate culture issues with restrictive covenants that may impact franchisee autonomy
  5. 05MINORService-based franchise model highly dependent on owner involvement, labor costs, and local market saturation with minimal recurring revenue protection

Severity inferred from the FDD text · not a regulatory classification

Showing the headline figures — all 153 extracted fields are in the Full FDD Report · $19 →

Full litigation history from the FDD (Items 3 and 4) →

What are you signing up for?

Ongoing fees run about 7.0% of sales (royalty + ad fund), before rent and labor.

Initial term10 yrs
Renewal term10 yrs
TerritoryProtected, not exclusive
Initial training96 hrs

Source: FDD 2025 · Items 11, 12, 17

FDD Items 12, 15, 17 · continued from Risk & Legal

Contract & Territory Detail

Initial term10 years
Renewal term10 years
Allowed renewalsℹ2
Territory typeProtected territory
Protected territoryYes
Exclusive territoryℹNo
Territory population800,000
Online sales rightsℹRestricted
Franchisor can competeYes
Hire a manager?Allowed
Owner-operatorRequired
Non-compete (years)ℹ2 years
Non-compete (miles)ℹ20 mi
Right of first refusalℹYes
Transfer requires consentYes
Termination notice30 days
Mandatory arbitrationYes
Arbitration locationNorth Carolina
Jury trial waiverYes
Governing lawNC
Litigation count5
View Item 3 litigation summary

5 predecessor/affiliate matters: 4 regulatory consent orders against TMA Franchise Systems (predecessor to Mosquito Authority) for franchise registration violations in Maryland (2013), Rhode Island (2013), Virginia (2015), and Minnesota (2017); plus 1 Soccer Shots affiliate assurance of discontinuance re no-poaching provisions (2019). No pending litigation for current franchisor.

Items 10, 11

Training & Operations

Classroom training
16 hrs
On-the-job training
80 hrs
Training location
Charlotte, NC headquarters and Malvern, PA
Ongoing training
Required
Time to open
2 mo
From signing to launch
Franchisor financing
Not offered
Item 10
POS system
ServiceMinder
Operating tech stack

Items 5 & 11

Franchisor Support

✗Site selection assistance
✓Grand opening support
✗Lease negotiation help

Technology: ServiceMinder

Item 20 · call current owners

Franchisee Contacts

1 owners to call

Name · phone · city · state. Extracted from FDD Item 20

Unlock 1 contacts · $49
Free preview
(626) 261-••••CA

Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does it cost to open a Fitness Machine Technicians FMT franchise?

The total investment to open a Fitness Machine Technicians FMT franchise ranges from $66K – $128K, with an initial franchise fee of $45K. This includes real estate, equipment, inventory, and working capital as disclosed in their Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD).

What do Fitness Machine Technicians FMT franchise owners earn?

According to Item 19 of the Fitness Machine Technicians FMT FDD, the average gross sales per unit is $467K. Important context: Averaged per franchisee, not per outlet - not comparable with per-outlet figures; Reported for a subset of outlets rather than the whole system. Note: this is gross revenue, not profit. Actual owner earnings vary based on location, operating costs, and management.

Who owns Fitness Machine Technicians FMT?

Fitness Machine Technicians FMT is franchised by Main Line Brands LLC. Its parent company is Main Line Brands Holdings, LLC. The ultimate parent named in the FDD is Susquehanna Private Capital Fund II, LLP. Source: FDD Item 1, 2025 filing.

What is Item 19 in the Fitness Machine Technicians FMT FDD?

The FDD section where a franchisor may disclose financial performance of its outlets. Disclosure is optional and formats vary; figures are typically gross sales, which is revenue before expenses, not profit. FranchiseVerdict extracts these figures directly from the Fitness Machine Technicians FMT FDD and qualifies whose outlets they describe.

What is Fitness Machine Technicians FMT's franchise failure rate?

SBA 7(a) loan charge-off data is not available for Fitness Machine Technicians FMT (fewer than 10 loans on file). Charge-off rates are one way to gauge franchise risk, but not all franchise loans go through the SBA program. We recommend reviewing turnover and closure data in the FDD and speaking with current franchisees.

How many Fitness Machine Technicians FMT franchise locations are there?

As of their most recent FDD filing, Fitness Machine Technicians FMT has 140 total units in the United States, including 132 franchised units and 8 company-owned units. 17 new units were opened in the latest reporting year.

Is Fitness Machine Technicians FMT a good franchise to buy?

FranchiseVerdict rates Fitness Machine Technicians FMT as a A-grade franchise with a verdict score of 73 out of 100 (higher is better). The grade is a deterministic score built from six weighted dimensions — financial health, unit economics, unit growth, scale, legal, and transparency — then calibrated against SBA loan charge-off rates and FDD age. Transparency is one of the six, so a filing that discloses less scores lower on that dimension than one that discloses more. Our rating is based solely on publicly available FDD and government data; we recommend speaking with current franchisees before making any investment decision. This is not investment advice.

Data sourced from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) FOIA records. Not financial advice.

For franchisors

Are you the franchisor?

If you represent Fitness Machine Technicians FMT, you can request corrections or provide updated information.

Other Health & Fitness franchises

Compare similar franchise opportunities in the Health & Fitness category

Data extracted from public FDD filings and SBA 7(a) loan disclosures (FOIA). This information is provided for research purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Verify all figures with the franchisor's current Franchise Disclosure Document before making any investment decision.